Young Women's Perspective of the Pros and Cons to Seeking Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea

An Exploratory Study

Mariam R. Chacko, Kirk von Sternberg, Mary M. Velasquez, Constance M. Wiemann, Peggy B. Smith, Ralph DiClemente

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Objective: To identify young women's pros and cons (decisional balance) to seeking chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (NGC) screening. Design: Prospective, cross sectional study. Setting: Community-based reproductive health clinic. Participants: 192 young women (66% African American; mean age 18.9 years). Main Outcome Measures: Content analysis of responses obtained during a decisional balance exercise (pros and cons) promoting CT and NGC screening was conducted. Thematic categories were developed through a coding process, and each response was assigned to one thematic category. The frequency of pros and cons responses for each category and the frequency of participants endorsing each category were calculated. Results: Ten thematic categories in relation to pros and cons of seeking CT and NGC screening were: being healthy; awareness of the body; systemic factors around the clinic visit and testing procedures; benefits and aversions around treatment; partner trust issues; confidentiality; prevention of long term adverse effects, protection of the body; concern for others; fear of results/aversion to testing; and logistical barriers. The three most often cited pros were awareness of the body, being healthy and treatment issues; and the three most often cited cons were logistical barriers (time/transportation), fear/aversion to testing, and systemic factors. Conclusions: A variety of pros and cons to seeking CT and NGC screening were identified at a community-based clinic. Providers in clinical settings can utilize this information when encouraging patients to seek regular STI screening by elucidating and emphasizing those pros and cons that have the most influence on a young woman's decision-making to seek screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-193
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Fingerprint

Chlamydia
Gonorrhea
Fear
Confidentiality
Reproductive Health
Ambulatory Care
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
African Americans
Decision Making
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Exercise
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Chlamydia
  • Chlamydia screening
  • Decisional balance
  • Decisional balance and STI screening
  • Gonorrhea screening
  • STI screening
  • Transtheoretical model and STI screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Young Women's Perspective of the Pros and Cons to Seeking Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea : An Exploratory Study. / Chacko, Mariam R.; von Sternberg, Kirk; Velasquez, Mary M.; Wiemann, Constance M.; Smith, Peggy B.; DiClemente, Ralph.

In: Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.08.2008, p. 187-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chacko, Mariam R. ; von Sternberg, Kirk ; Velasquez, Mary M. ; Wiemann, Constance M. ; Smith, Peggy B. ; DiClemente, Ralph. / Young Women's Perspective of the Pros and Cons to Seeking Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea : An Exploratory Study. In: Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2008 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 187-193.
@article{ce0d7125216c4a53978089ee8e146768,
title = "Young Women's Perspective of the Pros and Cons to Seeking Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: An Exploratory Study",
abstract = "Study Objective: To identify young women's pros and cons (decisional balance) to seeking chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (NGC) screening. Design: Prospective, cross sectional study. Setting: Community-based reproductive health clinic. Participants: 192 young women (66{\%} African American; mean age 18.9 years). Main Outcome Measures: Content analysis of responses obtained during a decisional balance exercise (pros and cons) promoting CT and NGC screening was conducted. Thematic categories were developed through a coding process, and each response was assigned to one thematic category. The frequency of pros and cons responses for each category and the frequency of participants endorsing each category were calculated. Results: Ten thematic categories in relation to pros and cons of seeking CT and NGC screening were: being healthy; awareness of the body; systemic factors around the clinic visit and testing procedures; benefits and aversions around treatment; partner trust issues; confidentiality; prevention of long term adverse effects, protection of the body; concern for others; fear of results/aversion to testing; and logistical barriers. The three most often cited pros were awareness of the body, being healthy and treatment issues; and the three most often cited cons were logistical barriers (time/transportation), fear/aversion to testing, and systemic factors. Conclusions: A variety of pros and cons to seeking CT and NGC screening were identified at a community-based clinic. Providers in clinical settings can utilize this information when encouraging patients to seek regular STI screening by elucidating and emphasizing those pros and cons that have the most influence on a young woman's decision-making to seek screening.",
keywords = "Chlamydia, Chlamydia screening, Decisional balance, Decisional balance and STI screening, Gonorrhea screening, STI screening, Transtheoretical model and STI screening",
author = "Chacko, {Mariam R.} and {von Sternberg}, Kirk and Velasquez, {Mary M.} and Wiemann, {Constance M.} and Smith, {Peggy B.} and Ralph DiClemente",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpag.2007.08.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "187--193",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology",
issn = "1083-3188",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Young Women's Perspective of the Pros and Cons to Seeking Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea

T2 - An Exploratory Study

AU - Chacko, Mariam R.

AU - von Sternberg, Kirk

AU - Velasquez, Mary M.

AU - Wiemann, Constance M.

AU - Smith, Peggy B.

AU - DiClemente, Ralph

PY - 2008/8/1

Y1 - 2008/8/1

N2 - Study Objective: To identify young women's pros and cons (decisional balance) to seeking chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (NGC) screening. Design: Prospective, cross sectional study. Setting: Community-based reproductive health clinic. Participants: 192 young women (66% African American; mean age 18.9 years). Main Outcome Measures: Content analysis of responses obtained during a decisional balance exercise (pros and cons) promoting CT and NGC screening was conducted. Thematic categories were developed through a coding process, and each response was assigned to one thematic category. The frequency of pros and cons responses for each category and the frequency of participants endorsing each category were calculated. Results: Ten thematic categories in relation to pros and cons of seeking CT and NGC screening were: being healthy; awareness of the body; systemic factors around the clinic visit and testing procedures; benefits and aversions around treatment; partner trust issues; confidentiality; prevention of long term adverse effects, protection of the body; concern for others; fear of results/aversion to testing; and logistical barriers. The three most often cited pros were awareness of the body, being healthy and treatment issues; and the three most often cited cons were logistical barriers (time/transportation), fear/aversion to testing, and systemic factors. Conclusions: A variety of pros and cons to seeking CT and NGC screening were identified at a community-based clinic. Providers in clinical settings can utilize this information when encouraging patients to seek regular STI screening by elucidating and emphasizing those pros and cons that have the most influence on a young woman's decision-making to seek screening.

AB - Study Objective: To identify young women's pros and cons (decisional balance) to seeking chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (NGC) screening. Design: Prospective, cross sectional study. Setting: Community-based reproductive health clinic. Participants: 192 young women (66% African American; mean age 18.9 years). Main Outcome Measures: Content analysis of responses obtained during a decisional balance exercise (pros and cons) promoting CT and NGC screening was conducted. Thematic categories were developed through a coding process, and each response was assigned to one thematic category. The frequency of pros and cons responses for each category and the frequency of participants endorsing each category were calculated. Results: Ten thematic categories in relation to pros and cons of seeking CT and NGC screening were: being healthy; awareness of the body; systemic factors around the clinic visit and testing procedures; benefits and aversions around treatment; partner trust issues; confidentiality; prevention of long term adverse effects, protection of the body; concern for others; fear of results/aversion to testing; and logistical barriers. The three most often cited pros were awareness of the body, being healthy and treatment issues; and the three most often cited cons were logistical barriers (time/transportation), fear/aversion to testing, and systemic factors. Conclusions: A variety of pros and cons to seeking CT and NGC screening were identified at a community-based clinic. Providers in clinical settings can utilize this information when encouraging patients to seek regular STI screening by elucidating and emphasizing those pros and cons that have the most influence on a young woman's decision-making to seek screening.

KW - Chlamydia

KW - Chlamydia screening

KW - Decisional balance

KW - Decisional balance and STI screening

KW - Gonorrhea screening

KW - STI screening

KW - Transtheoretical model and STI screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48949118329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48949118329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpag.2007.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jpag.2007.08.009

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 187

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

JF - Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

SN - 1083-3188

IS - 4

ER -