Writing competitive proposals for programs in nsf's division of research on learning in formal and informal settings

Ellen McCallie, Christopher Hoadley, Michael Ford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The National Science Foundation supports innovative research, development, and evaluation of learning and teaching across STEM settings. This workshop focuses on understanding the priorities of DRL's programs and provides guidance in writing competitive, high quality proposals. The workshop is structured to include opportunities for collaborative work, discussion, and questions. The content of the workshop includes: 1) STEM educational research in DRL; 2) priorities and changes in DRL's major programs, 3) NSF's proposal review process; and (4) characteristics of competitive and poorly-rated proposals. Both novice and experienced researchers are encouraged join in the discussions and to bring proposal concepts for discussion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1698-1699
Number of pages2
JournalProceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS
Volume3
Issue numberJanuary
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Technical presentations
learning
Teaching
educational research
research and development
science
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{c8b8188d16a9411e9469143317b7edbe,
title = "Writing competitive proposals for programs in nsf's division of research on learning in formal and informal settings",
abstract = "The National Science Foundation supports innovative research, development, and evaluation of learning and teaching across STEM settings. This workshop focuses on understanding the priorities of DRL's programs and provides guidance in writing competitive, high quality proposals. The workshop is structured to include opportunities for collaborative work, discussion, and questions. The content of the workshop includes: 1) STEM educational research in DRL; 2) priorities and changes in DRL's major programs, 3) NSF's proposal review process; and (4) characteristics of competitive and poorly-rated proposals. Both novice and experienced researchers are encouraged join in the discussions and to bring proposal concepts for discussion.",
author = "Ellen McCallie and Christopher Hoadley and Michael Ford",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "1698--1699",
journal = "Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS",
issn = "1814-9316",
publisher = "International Society of the Learning Sciences",
number = "January",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Writing competitive proposals for programs in nsf's division of research on learning in formal and informal settings

AU - McCallie, Ellen

AU - Hoadley, Christopher

AU - Ford, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The National Science Foundation supports innovative research, development, and evaluation of learning and teaching across STEM settings. This workshop focuses on understanding the priorities of DRL's programs and provides guidance in writing competitive, high quality proposals. The workshop is structured to include opportunities for collaborative work, discussion, and questions. The content of the workshop includes: 1) STEM educational research in DRL; 2) priorities and changes in DRL's major programs, 3) NSF's proposal review process; and (4) characteristics of competitive and poorly-rated proposals. Both novice and experienced researchers are encouraged join in the discussions and to bring proposal concepts for discussion.

AB - The National Science Foundation supports innovative research, development, and evaluation of learning and teaching across STEM settings. This workshop focuses on understanding the priorities of DRL's programs and provides guidance in writing competitive, high quality proposals. The workshop is structured to include opportunities for collaborative work, discussion, and questions. The content of the workshop includes: 1) STEM educational research in DRL; 2) priorities and changes in DRL's major programs, 3) NSF's proposal review process; and (4) characteristics of competitive and poorly-rated proposals. Both novice and experienced researchers are encouraged join in the discussions and to bring proposal concepts for discussion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937783846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937783846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 1698

EP - 1699

JO - Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

JF - Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

SN - 1814-9316

IS - January

ER -