Workaholics and dropouts in organizations

Wieland Müller, Andrew Schotter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper reports the results of experiments designed to test the theory of the optimal composition of prizes in contests. In the aggregate the behavior of subjects is consistent with that predicted by the theory, but we find that such aggregate results mask an unexpected compositional effect on the individual level. Whereas theory predicts that subject efforts are continuous and increasing functions of ability, the actual efforts of our laboratory subjects bifurcate. Low-ability workers drop out and exert little or no effort, and high-ability workers try too hard. This bifurcation, which is masked by aggregation, can be explained by assuming loss aversion on the part of the subjects. (JEL: C92, D44, D72, D82, J31)

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)717-743
    Number of pages27
    JournalJournal of the European Economic Association
    Volume8
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2010

    Fingerprint

    Drop out
    Workers
    Loss aversion
    Bifurcation
    Contests
    Experiment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Cite this

    Workaholics and dropouts in organizations. / Müller, Wieland; Schotter, Andrew.

    In: Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 8, No. 4, 06.2010, p. 717-743.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Müller, Wieland ; Schotter, Andrew. / Workaholics and dropouts in organizations. In: Journal of the European Economic Association. 2010 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 717-743.
    @article{ce30956684fa4a9683f7ece245ab1239,
    title = "Workaholics and dropouts in organizations",
    abstract = "This paper reports the results of experiments designed to test the theory of the optimal composition of prizes in contests. In the aggregate the behavior of subjects is consistent with that predicted by the theory, but we find that such aggregate results mask an unexpected compositional effect on the individual level. Whereas theory predicts that subject efforts are continuous and increasing functions of ability, the actual efforts of our laboratory subjects bifurcate. Low-ability workers drop out and exert little or no effort, and high-ability workers try too hard. This bifurcation, which is masked by aggregation, can be explained by assuming loss aversion on the part of the subjects. (JEL: C92, D44, D72, D82, J31)",
    author = "Wieland M{\"u}ller and Andrew Schotter",
    year = "2010",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1162/jeea_a_00002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "717--743",
    journal = "Journal of the European Economic Association",
    issn = "1542-4774",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Workaholics and dropouts in organizations

    AU - Müller, Wieland

    AU - Schotter, Andrew

    PY - 2010/6

    Y1 - 2010/6

    N2 - This paper reports the results of experiments designed to test the theory of the optimal composition of prizes in contests. In the aggregate the behavior of subjects is consistent with that predicted by the theory, but we find that such aggregate results mask an unexpected compositional effect on the individual level. Whereas theory predicts that subject efforts are continuous and increasing functions of ability, the actual efforts of our laboratory subjects bifurcate. Low-ability workers drop out and exert little or no effort, and high-ability workers try too hard. This bifurcation, which is masked by aggregation, can be explained by assuming loss aversion on the part of the subjects. (JEL: C92, D44, D72, D82, J31)

    AB - This paper reports the results of experiments designed to test the theory of the optimal composition of prizes in contests. In the aggregate the behavior of subjects is consistent with that predicted by the theory, but we find that such aggregate results mask an unexpected compositional effect on the individual level. Whereas theory predicts that subject efforts are continuous and increasing functions of ability, the actual efforts of our laboratory subjects bifurcate. Low-ability workers drop out and exert little or no effort, and high-ability workers try too hard. This bifurcation, which is masked by aggregation, can be explained by assuming loss aversion on the part of the subjects. (JEL: C92, D44, D72, D82, J31)

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953531325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953531325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1162/jeea_a_00002

    DO - 10.1162/jeea_a_00002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 717

    EP - 743

    JO - Journal of the European Economic Association

    JF - Journal of the European Economic Association

    SN - 1542-4774

    IS - 4

    ER -