Women, work and elder care: The family and medical leave debate

Suzanne E. England, Beatrice T. Naulleau

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    First introduced in 1984, Family and Medical Leave (FML) legislation would provide some measure of job protection to those who interrupt their employment to provide care for ill or dependent relatives. The original proposals were for 'parental' leave but, as bills and laws evolved, leave to care for an elderly relative began to be included. Opponents of FML object to further regulation of employee benefits and, partly because the groups promoting FML have not found a common and persuasive voice, have been relatively successful in preventing passage or in watering down FML's impact. Comparison of the messages to constituents of two advocacy groups for the elderly, the Older Women's League and the American Association for Retired Persons, illustrates the contradictions and points to the need to come to terms with the conflicts inherent in the ideology of caring.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)91-107
    Number of pages17
    JournalWomen and Politics
    Volume11
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 3 1991

    Fingerprint

    women's work
    parental leave
    bill
    ideology
    Group
    legislation
    employee
    regulation
    human being
    Law

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Gender Studies
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Women, work and elder care : The family and medical leave debate. / England, Suzanne E.; Naulleau, Beatrice T.

    In: Women and Politics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 03.06.1991, p. 91-107.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    England, Suzanne E. ; Naulleau, Beatrice T. / Women, work and elder care : The family and medical leave debate. In: Women and Politics. 1991 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 91-107.
    @article{c60cc4d7522a45cb993e2b5bf8ce0ebc,
    title = "Women, work and elder care: The family and medical leave debate",
    abstract = "First introduced in 1984, Family and Medical Leave (FML) legislation would provide some measure of job protection to those who interrupt their employment to provide care for ill or dependent relatives. The original proposals were for 'parental' leave but, as bills and laws evolved, leave to care for an elderly relative began to be included. Opponents of FML object to further regulation of employee benefits and, partly because the groups promoting FML have not found a common and persuasive voice, have been relatively successful in preventing passage or in watering down FML's impact. Comparison of the messages to constituents of two advocacy groups for the elderly, the Older Women's League and the American Association for Retired Persons, illustrates the contradictions and points to the need to come to terms with the conflicts inherent in the ideology of caring.",
    author = "England, {Suzanne E.} and Naulleau, {Beatrice T.}",
    year = "1991",
    month = "6",
    day = "3",
    doi = "10.1300/J014v11n02_05",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "91--107",
    journal = "Journal of Women, Politics and Policy",
    issn = "1554-477X",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Women, work and elder care

    T2 - The family and medical leave debate

    AU - England, Suzanne E.

    AU - Naulleau, Beatrice T.

    PY - 1991/6/3

    Y1 - 1991/6/3

    N2 - First introduced in 1984, Family and Medical Leave (FML) legislation would provide some measure of job protection to those who interrupt their employment to provide care for ill or dependent relatives. The original proposals were for 'parental' leave but, as bills and laws evolved, leave to care for an elderly relative began to be included. Opponents of FML object to further regulation of employee benefits and, partly because the groups promoting FML have not found a common and persuasive voice, have been relatively successful in preventing passage or in watering down FML's impact. Comparison of the messages to constituents of two advocacy groups for the elderly, the Older Women's League and the American Association for Retired Persons, illustrates the contradictions and points to the need to come to terms with the conflicts inherent in the ideology of caring.

    AB - First introduced in 1984, Family and Medical Leave (FML) legislation would provide some measure of job protection to those who interrupt their employment to provide care for ill or dependent relatives. The original proposals were for 'parental' leave but, as bills and laws evolved, leave to care for an elderly relative began to be included. Opponents of FML object to further regulation of employee benefits and, partly because the groups promoting FML have not found a common and persuasive voice, have been relatively successful in preventing passage or in watering down FML's impact. Comparison of the messages to constituents of two advocacy groups for the elderly, the Older Women's League and the American Association for Retired Persons, illustrates the contradictions and points to the need to come to terms with the conflicts inherent in the ideology of caring.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952528830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952528830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1300/J014v11n02_05

    DO - 10.1300/J014v11n02_05

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84952528830

    VL - 11

    SP - 91

    EP - 107

    JO - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

    JF - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

    SN - 1554-477X

    IS - 2

    ER -