Wikipedia, sociology, and the promise and pitfalls of Big Data

Julia Adams, Hannah Brückner

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Wikipedia is an important instance of “Big Data,” both because it shapes people's frames of reference and because it is a window into the construction—including via crowd-sourcing—of new bodies of knowledge. Based on our own research as well as others' critical and ethnographic work, we take as an instance Wikipedia's evolving representation of the field of sociology and sociologists, including such gendered aspects as male and female scholars and topics associated with masculinity and femininity. Both the gender-specific dynamics surrounding what counts as “notability” on the online encyclopedia and Wikipedia's relative categorical incoherence are discussed. If “Big Data” can be said to construct its own object, it is, in this instance, a curious and lop-sided one, exemplifying pitfalls as well as promise with respect to more accurate and democratic forms of knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBig Data and Society
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Wikipedia
sociology
femininity
sociologist
masculinity
gender
knowledge
Sociology
Big data

Keywords

  • Big Data
  • encyclopedia
  • gender
  • knowledge
  • sociology
  • Wikipedia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Communication
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Wikipedia, sociology, and the promise and pitfalls of Big Data. / Adams, Julia; Brückner, Hannah.

In: Big Data and Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{525ec43343bb49e287758d865d9924e6,
title = "Wikipedia, sociology, and the promise and pitfalls of Big Data",
abstract = "Wikipedia is an important instance of “Big Data,” both because it shapes people's frames of reference and because it is a window into the construction—including via crowd-sourcing—of new bodies of knowledge. Based on our own research as well as others' critical and ethnographic work, we take as an instance Wikipedia's evolving representation of the field of sociology and sociologists, including such gendered aspects as male and female scholars and topics associated with masculinity and femininity. Both the gender-specific dynamics surrounding what counts as “notability” on the online encyclopedia and Wikipedia's relative categorical incoherence are discussed. If “Big Data” can be said to construct its own object, it is, in this instance, a curious and lop-sided one, exemplifying pitfalls as well as promise with respect to more accurate and democratic forms of knowledge.",
keywords = "Big Data, encyclopedia, gender, knowledge, sociology, Wikipedia",
author = "Julia Adams and Hannah Br{\"u}ckner",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2053951715614332",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "Big Data and Society",
issn = "2053-9517",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wikipedia, sociology, and the promise and pitfalls of Big Data

AU - Adams, Julia

AU - Brückner, Hannah

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Wikipedia is an important instance of “Big Data,” both because it shapes people's frames of reference and because it is a window into the construction—including via crowd-sourcing—of new bodies of knowledge. Based on our own research as well as others' critical and ethnographic work, we take as an instance Wikipedia's evolving representation of the field of sociology and sociologists, including such gendered aspects as male and female scholars and topics associated with masculinity and femininity. Both the gender-specific dynamics surrounding what counts as “notability” on the online encyclopedia and Wikipedia's relative categorical incoherence are discussed. If “Big Data” can be said to construct its own object, it is, in this instance, a curious and lop-sided one, exemplifying pitfalls as well as promise with respect to more accurate and democratic forms of knowledge.

AB - Wikipedia is an important instance of “Big Data,” both because it shapes people's frames of reference and because it is a window into the construction—including via crowd-sourcing—of new bodies of knowledge. Based on our own research as well as others' critical and ethnographic work, we take as an instance Wikipedia's evolving representation of the field of sociology and sociologists, including such gendered aspects as male and female scholars and topics associated with masculinity and femininity. Both the gender-specific dynamics surrounding what counts as “notability” on the online encyclopedia and Wikipedia's relative categorical incoherence are discussed. If “Big Data” can be said to construct its own object, it is, in this instance, a curious and lop-sided one, exemplifying pitfalls as well as promise with respect to more accurate and democratic forms of knowledge.

KW - Big Data

KW - encyclopedia

KW - gender

KW - knowledge

KW - sociology

KW - Wikipedia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043361581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043361581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2053951715614332

DO - 10.1177/2053951715614332

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85043361581

VL - 2

JO - Big Data and Society

JF - Big Data and Society

SN - 2053-9517

IS - 2

ER -