Why psychology needs conceptual analysts: Wachtel's "discontents" revisited

Jerome C. Wakefield

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    Abstract

    Commenting on Wachtel's "Investigation and its Discontents" [Wachtel, P. L. (1980). Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 399-408], I agree that lack of support for a career path of conceptual analysis and critique is a serious problem. Psychology requires a strong conceptual component because it is subject to unusual distortions and self-deceptions in theory formation and evidential evaluation due to issues of power, self-esteem, and social ideology. I agree with Wachtel that pressures for quantity of publication are detrimental to scientific quality, but dispute his suggestion that excessive focus on quantity in assessing productivity can be addressed by having tenure and promotion candidates submit only their three best papers. Such reviews must be based on the entire record, so improvements must involve journals' acceptance standards. Regarding Wachtel's concern about the influence of grants on reviews, I argue that grants should be relevant only to the extent they bear on the candidate's scholarly goals.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)39-43
    Number of pages5
    JournalApplied and Preventive Psychology
    Volume12
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

    Fingerprint

    Organized Financing
    Psychology
    Dissent and Disputes
    Deception
    Self Concept
    Publications
    Pressure
    Research
    Power (Psychology)

    Keywords

    • Conceptual analysis
    • Foucault
    • Harmful dysfunction
    • Philosophy of psychology
    • Theoretical psychology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    Why psychology needs conceptual analysts : Wachtel's "discontents" revisited. / Wakefield, Jerome C.

    In: Applied and Preventive Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 39-43.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    @article{388c09be44494c52befd68dac5123a65,
    title = "Why psychology needs conceptual analysts: Wachtel's {"}discontents{"} revisited",
    abstract = "Commenting on Wachtel's {"}Investigation and its Discontents{"} [Wachtel, P. L. (1980). Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 399-408], I agree that lack of support for a career path of conceptual analysis and critique is a serious problem. Psychology requires a strong conceptual component because it is subject to unusual distortions and self-deceptions in theory formation and evidential evaluation due to issues of power, self-esteem, and social ideology. I agree with Wachtel that pressures for quantity of publication are detrimental to scientific quality, but dispute his suggestion that excessive focus on quantity in assessing productivity can be addressed by having tenure and promotion candidates submit only their three best papers. Such reviews must be based on the entire record, so improvements must involve journals' acceptance standards. Regarding Wachtel's concern about the influence of grants on reviews, I argue that grants should be relevant only to the extent they bear on the candidate's scholarly goals.",
    keywords = "Conceptual analysis, Foucault, Harmful dysfunction, Philosophy of psychology, Theoretical psychology",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.}",
    year = "2007",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.014",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "39--43",
    journal = "Applied and Preventive Psychology",
    issn = "0962-1849",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why psychology needs conceptual analysts

    T2 - Wachtel's "discontents" revisited

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    PY - 2007/1/1

    Y1 - 2007/1/1

    N2 - Commenting on Wachtel's "Investigation and its Discontents" [Wachtel, P. L. (1980). Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 399-408], I agree that lack of support for a career path of conceptual analysis and critique is a serious problem. Psychology requires a strong conceptual component because it is subject to unusual distortions and self-deceptions in theory formation and evidential evaluation due to issues of power, self-esteem, and social ideology. I agree with Wachtel that pressures for quantity of publication are detrimental to scientific quality, but dispute his suggestion that excessive focus on quantity in assessing productivity can be addressed by having tenure and promotion candidates submit only their three best papers. Such reviews must be based on the entire record, so improvements must involve journals' acceptance standards. Regarding Wachtel's concern about the influence of grants on reviews, I argue that grants should be relevant only to the extent they bear on the candidate's scholarly goals.

    AB - Commenting on Wachtel's "Investigation and its Discontents" [Wachtel, P. L. (1980). Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 399-408], I agree that lack of support for a career path of conceptual analysis and critique is a serious problem. Psychology requires a strong conceptual component because it is subject to unusual distortions and self-deceptions in theory formation and evidential evaluation due to issues of power, self-esteem, and social ideology. I agree with Wachtel that pressures for quantity of publication are detrimental to scientific quality, but dispute his suggestion that excessive focus on quantity in assessing productivity can be addressed by having tenure and promotion candidates submit only their three best papers. Such reviews must be based on the entire record, so improvements must involve journals' acceptance standards. Regarding Wachtel's concern about the influence of grants on reviews, I argue that grants should be relevant only to the extent they bear on the candidate's scholarly goals.

    KW - Conceptual analysis

    KW - Foucault

    KW - Harmful dysfunction

    KW - Philosophy of psychology

    KW - Theoretical psychology

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548718121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548718121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.014

    DO - 10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.014

    M3 - Comment/debate

    AN - SCOPUS:34548718121

    VL - 12

    SP - 39

    EP - 43

    JO - Applied and Preventive Psychology

    JF - Applied and Preventive Psychology

    SN - 0962-1849

    IS - 1

    ER -