Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution so Low?

Martin S. Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S. Landy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spatial stereoresolution (the finest detectable modulation of binocular disparity) is much poorer than luminance resolution (finest detectable luminance variation). In a series of psychophysical experiments, we examined four factors that could cause low stereoresolution: (1) the sampling properties of the stimulus, (2) the disparity gradient limit, (3) low-pass spatial filtering by mechanisms early in the visual process, and (4) the method bywhich binocular matches are computed. Our experimental results reveal the contributions of the first three factors. A theoretical analysis of binocular matching by interocular correlation reveals the contribution of the fourth: the highest attainable stereoresolution may be limited by (1) the smallest useful correlation window in the visual system, and (2) a matching process that estimates the disparity of image patches and assumes that disparity is constant across the patch. Both properties are observed in disparity-selective neurons in area V1 of the primate (Nienborg et al., 2004).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2077-2089
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 3 2004

Fingerprint

Vision Disparity
Primates
Neurons

Keywords

  • Binocular correspondence
  • Binocular disparity
  • Binocular vision
  • Disparity energy model
  • Stereopsis
  • Stereoresolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution so Low? / Banks, Martin S.; Gepshtein, Sergei; Landy, Michael S.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 24, No. 9, 03.03.2004, p. 2077-2089.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Banks, Martin S. ; Gepshtein, Sergei ; Landy, Michael S. / Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution so Low?. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2004 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 2077-2089.
@article{f24988eae7d34efe8d621a32bff1a07d,
title = "Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution so Low?",
abstract = "Spatial stereoresolution (the finest detectable modulation of binocular disparity) is much poorer than luminance resolution (finest detectable luminance variation). In a series of psychophysical experiments, we examined four factors that could cause low stereoresolution: (1) the sampling properties of the stimulus, (2) the disparity gradient limit, (3) low-pass spatial filtering by mechanisms early in the visual process, and (4) the method bywhich binocular matches are computed. Our experimental results reveal the contributions of the first three factors. A theoretical analysis of binocular matching by interocular correlation reveals the contribution of the fourth: the highest attainable stereoresolution may be limited by (1) the smallest useful correlation window in the visual system, and (2) a matching process that estimates the disparity of image patches and assumes that disparity is constant across the patch. Both properties are observed in disparity-selective neurons in area V1 of the primate (Nienborg et al., 2004).",
keywords = "Binocular correspondence, Binocular disparity, Binocular vision, Disparity energy model, Stereopsis, Stereoresolution",
author = "Banks, {Martin S.} and Sergei Gepshtein and Landy, {Michael S.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-02.2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "2077--2089",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution so Low?

AU - Banks, Martin S.

AU - Gepshtein, Sergei

AU - Landy, Michael S.

PY - 2004/3/3

Y1 - 2004/3/3

N2 - Spatial stereoresolution (the finest detectable modulation of binocular disparity) is much poorer than luminance resolution (finest detectable luminance variation). In a series of psychophysical experiments, we examined four factors that could cause low stereoresolution: (1) the sampling properties of the stimulus, (2) the disparity gradient limit, (3) low-pass spatial filtering by mechanisms early in the visual process, and (4) the method bywhich binocular matches are computed. Our experimental results reveal the contributions of the first three factors. A theoretical analysis of binocular matching by interocular correlation reveals the contribution of the fourth: the highest attainable stereoresolution may be limited by (1) the smallest useful correlation window in the visual system, and (2) a matching process that estimates the disparity of image patches and assumes that disparity is constant across the patch. Both properties are observed in disparity-selective neurons in area V1 of the primate (Nienborg et al., 2004).

AB - Spatial stereoresolution (the finest detectable modulation of binocular disparity) is much poorer than luminance resolution (finest detectable luminance variation). In a series of psychophysical experiments, we examined four factors that could cause low stereoresolution: (1) the sampling properties of the stimulus, (2) the disparity gradient limit, (3) low-pass spatial filtering by mechanisms early in the visual process, and (4) the method bywhich binocular matches are computed. Our experimental results reveal the contributions of the first three factors. A theoretical analysis of binocular matching by interocular correlation reveals the contribution of the fourth: the highest attainable stereoresolution may be limited by (1) the smallest useful correlation window in the visual system, and (2) a matching process that estimates the disparity of image patches and assumes that disparity is constant across the patch. Both properties are observed in disparity-selective neurons in area V1 of the primate (Nienborg et al., 2004).

KW - Binocular correspondence

KW - Binocular disparity

KW - Binocular vision

KW - Disparity energy model

KW - Stereopsis

KW - Stereoresolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542347202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542347202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-02.2004

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-02.2004

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 2077

EP - 2089

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 9

ER -