Why do "women's jobs" have low pay for their educational level?

Carolyn Aman Karlin, Paula England, Mary Richardson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Jobs held largely by women have low pay for the amount of education they require. Why is this? One hypothesis is that employers prefer to hire men, and all workers prefer better jobs, so that women can get in only when a job's rewards (relative to its skill requirements) are low enough that men no longer want the job. Thus, wages affect sex composition. Others see the causal arrow to run the other way. In this view, the sex composition of jobs affects the wage that employers offer; employers' biased perceptions lead them to see jobs as less important and less payworthy if they are filled largely by women. These explanations are not mutually exclusive; the causal arrow may run both ways (or neither way). In this paper we use CPS data from 1984 to 1991 and a cross-lag panel model to examine these effects. Jobs are defined with a detailed occupational category within a specific broad industry category. We find that jobs with a higher percentage of females at one point have slower wage growth (or steeper wage decline) for both men and women in the ensuing years. But we find no effect of earlier wage rate on later sex composition. For those interested in reducing gender inequality in earnings, these findings suggest the utility of "comparable worth" policies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)3-22
    Number of pages20
    JournalGender Issues
    Volume20
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    wage
    employer
    reward
    worker
    industry
    gender
    education

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Gender Studies

    Cite this

    Why do "women's jobs" have low pay for their educational level? / Karlin, Carolyn Aman; England, Paula; Richardson, Mary.

    In: Gender Issues, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2002, p. 3-22.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Karlin, Carolyn Aman ; England, Paula ; Richardson, Mary. / Why do "women's jobs" have low pay for their educational level?. In: Gender Issues. 2002 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 3-22.
    @article{fad5b3aead9149dba50dd58063284bc0,
    title = "Why do {"}women's jobs{"} have low pay for their educational level?",
    abstract = "Jobs held largely by women have low pay for the amount of education they require. Why is this? One hypothesis is that employers prefer to hire men, and all workers prefer better jobs, so that women can get in only when a job's rewards (relative to its skill requirements) are low enough that men no longer want the job. Thus, wages affect sex composition. Others see the causal arrow to run the other way. In this view, the sex composition of jobs affects the wage that employers offer; employers' biased perceptions lead them to see jobs as less important and less payworthy if they are filled largely by women. These explanations are not mutually exclusive; the causal arrow may run both ways (or neither way). In this paper we use CPS data from 1984 to 1991 and a cross-lag panel model to examine these effects. Jobs are defined with a detailed occupational category within a specific broad industry category. We find that jobs with a higher percentage of females at one point have slower wage growth (or steeper wage decline) for both men and women in the ensuing years. But we find no effect of earlier wage rate on later sex composition. For those interested in reducing gender inequality in earnings, these findings suggest the utility of {"}comparable worth{"} policies.",
    author = "Karlin, {Carolyn Aman} and Paula England and Mary Richardson",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1007/s12147-002-0020-6",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "3--22",
    journal = "Gender Issues",
    issn = "1098-092X",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why do "women's jobs" have low pay for their educational level?

    AU - Karlin, Carolyn Aman

    AU - England, Paula

    AU - Richardson, Mary

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - Jobs held largely by women have low pay for the amount of education they require. Why is this? One hypothesis is that employers prefer to hire men, and all workers prefer better jobs, so that women can get in only when a job's rewards (relative to its skill requirements) are low enough that men no longer want the job. Thus, wages affect sex composition. Others see the causal arrow to run the other way. In this view, the sex composition of jobs affects the wage that employers offer; employers' biased perceptions lead them to see jobs as less important and less payworthy if they are filled largely by women. These explanations are not mutually exclusive; the causal arrow may run both ways (or neither way). In this paper we use CPS data from 1984 to 1991 and a cross-lag panel model to examine these effects. Jobs are defined with a detailed occupational category within a specific broad industry category. We find that jobs with a higher percentage of females at one point have slower wage growth (or steeper wage decline) for both men and women in the ensuing years. But we find no effect of earlier wage rate on later sex composition. For those interested in reducing gender inequality in earnings, these findings suggest the utility of "comparable worth" policies.

    AB - Jobs held largely by women have low pay for the amount of education they require. Why is this? One hypothesis is that employers prefer to hire men, and all workers prefer better jobs, so that women can get in only when a job's rewards (relative to its skill requirements) are low enough that men no longer want the job. Thus, wages affect sex composition. Others see the causal arrow to run the other way. In this view, the sex composition of jobs affects the wage that employers offer; employers' biased perceptions lead them to see jobs as less important and less payworthy if they are filled largely by women. These explanations are not mutually exclusive; the causal arrow may run both ways (or neither way). In this paper we use CPS data from 1984 to 1991 and a cross-lag panel model to examine these effects. Jobs are defined with a detailed occupational category within a specific broad industry category. We find that jobs with a higher percentage of females at one point have slower wage growth (or steeper wage decline) for both men and women in the ensuing years. But we find no effect of earlier wage rate on later sex composition. For those interested in reducing gender inequality in earnings, these findings suggest the utility of "comparable worth" policies.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247455747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247455747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s12147-002-0020-6

    DO - 10.1007/s12147-002-0020-6

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 3

    EP - 22

    JO - Gender Issues

    JF - Gender Issues

    SN - 1098-092X

    IS - 4

    ER -