Why do welfare states persist?

Clem Brooks, Jeffrey Manza

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The shape and aggregate output of welfare states within many developed democracies have been fairly resilient in the face of profound shifts in their national settings, and with respect to the global environment of the past 20 years. This contrasts with once-widespread predictions of universal retrenchment, and it has broadened debates over trends in social policymaking to focus on the phenomenon of welfare state persistence. Research on persistence has not, to date, directly considered the possibility that welfare states survive because of enduring popular support. Building from recent welfare state theory and the emerging literature on policy responsiveness, we consider the possibility that mass public opinion - citizens' aggregate policy preferences - are a factor behind welfare state persistence. We analyze a new country-level data set, controlling for established sources of welfare state development, and buttressing estimates by testing for endogeneity with respect to policy preferences. We find evidence that the temporal distribution of policy preferences has contributed to persistence tendencies in a number of welfare states. We discuss results in conclusion, suggesting the utility of further consideration of linkages between mass opinion and social policy in cross-national perspective.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)816-827
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Politics
    Volume68
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2006

    Fingerprint

    welfare state
    persistence
    public opinion
    democracy
    citizen
    trend
    evidence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Why do welfare states persist? / Brooks, Clem; Manza, Jeffrey.

    In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 4, 11.2006, p. 816-827.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Brooks, Clem ; Manza, Jeffrey. / Why do welfare states persist?. In: Journal of Politics. 2006 ; Vol. 68, No. 4. pp. 816-827.
    @article{84b43b43ab90494eb41b3abc14941ea5,
    title = "Why do welfare states persist?",
    abstract = "The shape and aggregate output of welfare states within many developed democracies have been fairly resilient in the face of profound shifts in their national settings, and with respect to the global environment of the past 20 years. This contrasts with once-widespread predictions of universal retrenchment, and it has broadened debates over trends in social policymaking to focus on the phenomenon of welfare state persistence. Research on persistence has not, to date, directly considered the possibility that welfare states survive because of enduring popular support. Building from recent welfare state theory and the emerging literature on policy responsiveness, we consider the possibility that mass public opinion - citizens' aggregate policy preferences - are a factor behind welfare state persistence. We analyze a new country-level data set, controlling for established sources of welfare state development, and buttressing estimates by testing for endogeneity with respect to policy preferences. We find evidence that the temporal distribution of policy preferences has contributed to persistence tendencies in a number of welfare states. We discuss results in conclusion, suggesting the utility of further consideration of linkages between mass opinion and social policy in cross-national perspective.",
    author = "Clem Brooks and Jeffrey Manza",
    year = "2006",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00472.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "68",
    pages = "816--827",
    journal = "Journal of Politics",
    issn = "0022-3816",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why do welfare states persist?

    AU - Brooks, Clem

    AU - Manza, Jeffrey

    PY - 2006/11

    Y1 - 2006/11

    N2 - The shape and aggregate output of welfare states within many developed democracies have been fairly resilient in the face of profound shifts in their national settings, and with respect to the global environment of the past 20 years. This contrasts with once-widespread predictions of universal retrenchment, and it has broadened debates over trends in social policymaking to focus on the phenomenon of welfare state persistence. Research on persistence has not, to date, directly considered the possibility that welfare states survive because of enduring popular support. Building from recent welfare state theory and the emerging literature on policy responsiveness, we consider the possibility that mass public opinion - citizens' aggregate policy preferences - are a factor behind welfare state persistence. We analyze a new country-level data set, controlling for established sources of welfare state development, and buttressing estimates by testing for endogeneity with respect to policy preferences. We find evidence that the temporal distribution of policy preferences has contributed to persistence tendencies in a number of welfare states. We discuss results in conclusion, suggesting the utility of further consideration of linkages between mass opinion and social policy in cross-national perspective.

    AB - The shape and aggregate output of welfare states within many developed democracies have been fairly resilient in the face of profound shifts in their national settings, and with respect to the global environment of the past 20 years. This contrasts with once-widespread predictions of universal retrenchment, and it has broadened debates over trends in social policymaking to focus on the phenomenon of welfare state persistence. Research on persistence has not, to date, directly considered the possibility that welfare states survive because of enduring popular support. Building from recent welfare state theory and the emerging literature on policy responsiveness, we consider the possibility that mass public opinion - citizens' aggregate policy preferences - are a factor behind welfare state persistence. We analyze a new country-level data set, controlling for established sources of welfare state development, and buttressing estimates by testing for endogeneity with respect to policy preferences. We find evidence that the temporal distribution of policy preferences has contributed to persistence tendencies in a number of welfare states. We discuss results in conclusion, suggesting the utility of further consideration of linkages between mass opinion and social policy in cross-national perspective.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746505777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746505777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00472.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00472.x

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:33746505777

    VL - 68

    SP - 816

    EP - 827

    JO - Journal of Politics

    JF - Journal of Politics

    SN - 0022-3816

    IS - 4

    ER -