Why do political parties obey results of elections?

Adam Przeworski

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    If democracy is to exist, at least one rule must be observed, namely the rule that specifies which of the political parties should occupy the office of government. My purpose is to investigate under what conditions political parties competing in elections obey their results. According to one view, people obey laws when they share a particular kind of culture. This culture may value the rule of law per se, regardless of the outcomes it generates. It may impose on people the duty to obey outcomes resulting from rules to which they agreed. Or it may foster temperamental characteristics predisposing them to obey laws. But whatever the specific features, rule of law can be sustained if and only if a society is characterized by a particular culture. An alternative theory sees the emergence of a rule of laws as an outcome of conflicts of interests. While situations in which everyone acts according to law can be described in cultural terms, this theory claims that such situations arise when the conflicting political forces find it in their best interest to act in conformity with some laws, given what everyone else is doing. The controversy concerns the causal mechanisms that generate these situations: are they an expression of some antecedent cultural patterns or are they an effect of pursuit of interests? Both views arrive at the same conclusion – namely, that there are some situations in which political actors act in conformity with laws.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationDemocracy and the Rule of Law
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages114-144
    Number of pages31
    ISBN (Electronic)9780511610066
    ISBN (Print)0521825598, 9780521825597
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

    Fingerprint

    election
    constitutional state
    Law
    conformity
    conflict of interest
    political actor
    democracy
    Values

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Przeworski, A. (2003). Why do political parties obey results of elections? In Democracy and the Rule of Law (pp. 114-144). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610066.006

    Why do political parties obey results of elections? / Przeworski, Adam.

    Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 114-144.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Przeworski, A 2003, Why do political parties obey results of elections? in Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press, pp. 114-144. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610066.006
    Przeworski A. Why do political parties obey results of elections? In Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press. 2003. p. 114-144 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610066.006
    Przeworski, Adam. / Why do political parties obey results of elections?. Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press, 2003. pp. 114-144
    @inbook{28e7428de0b94bf9802387fdda97cd78,
    title = "Why do political parties obey results of elections?",
    abstract = "If democracy is to exist, at least one rule must be observed, namely the rule that specifies which of the political parties should occupy the office of government. My purpose is to investigate under what conditions political parties competing in elections obey their results. According to one view, people obey laws when they share a particular kind of culture. This culture may value the rule of law per se, regardless of the outcomes it generates. It may impose on people the duty to obey outcomes resulting from rules to which they agreed. Or it may foster temperamental characteristics predisposing them to obey laws. But whatever the specific features, rule of law can be sustained if and only if a society is characterized by a particular culture. An alternative theory sees the emergence of a rule of laws as an outcome of conflicts of interests. While situations in which everyone acts according to law can be described in cultural terms, this theory claims that such situations arise when the conflicting political forces find it in their best interest to act in conformity with some laws, given what everyone else is doing. The controversy concerns the causal mechanisms that generate these situations: are they an expression of some antecedent cultural patterns or are they an effect of pursuit of interests? Both views arrive at the same conclusion – namely, that there are some situations in which political actors act in conformity with laws.",
    author = "Adam Przeworski",
    year = "2003",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511610066.006",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "0521825598",
    pages = "114--144",
    booktitle = "Democracy and the Rule of Law",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Why do political parties obey results of elections?

    AU - Przeworski, Adam

    PY - 2003/1/1

    Y1 - 2003/1/1

    N2 - If democracy is to exist, at least one rule must be observed, namely the rule that specifies which of the political parties should occupy the office of government. My purpose is to investigate under what conditions political parties competing in elections obey their results. According to one view, people obey laws when they share a particular kind of culture. This culture may value the rule of law per se, regardless of the outcomes it generates. It may impose on people the duty to obey outcomes resulting from rules to which they agreed. Or it may foster temperamental characteristics predisposing them to obey laws. But whatever the specific features, rule of law can be sustained if and only if a society is characterized by a particular culture. An alternative theory sees the emergence of a rule of laws as an outcome of conflicts of interests. While situations in which everyone acts according to law can be described in cultural terms, this theory claims that such situations arise when the conflicting political forces find it in their best interest to act in conformity with some laws, given what everyone else is doing. The controversy concerns the causal mechanisms that generate these situations: are they an expression of some antecedent cultural patterns or are they an effect of pursuit of interests? Both views arrive at the same conclusion – namely, that there are some situations in which political actors act in conformity with laws.

    AB - If democracy is to exist, at least one rule must be observed, namely the rule that specifies which of the political parties should occupy the office of government. My purpose is to investigate under what conditions political parties competing in elections obey their results. According to one view, people obey laws when they share a particular kind of culture. This culture may value the rule of law per se, regardless of the outcomes it generates. It may impose on people the duty to obey outcomes resulting from rules to which they agreed. Or it may foster temperamental characteristics predisposing them to obey laws. But whatever the specific features, rule of law can be sustained if and only if a society is characterized by a particular culture. An alternative theory sees the emergence of a rule of laws as an outcome of conflicts of interests. While situations in which everyone acts according to law can be described in cultural terms, this theory claims that such situations arise when the conflicting political forces find it in their best interest to act in conformity with some laws, given what everyone else is doing. The controversy concerns the causal mechanisms that generate these situations: are they an expression of some antecedent cultural patterns or are they an effect of pursuit of interests? Both views arrive at the same conclusion – namely, that there are some situations in which political actors act in conformity with laws.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927080295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927080295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511610066.006

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511610066.006

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 0521825598

    SN - 9780521825597

    SP - 114

    EP - 144

    BT - Democracy and the Rule of Law

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -