Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit

Madeline Heilman, Tyler G. Okimoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 3 experimental studies, the authors tested the idea that penalties women incur for success in traditionally male areas arise from a perceived deficit in nurturing and socially sensitive communal attributes that is implied by their success. The authors therefore expected that providing information of communality would prevent these penalties. Results indicated that the negativity directed at successful female managers - in ratings of likability, interpersonal hostility, and boss desirability - was mitigated when there was indication that they were communal. This ameliorative effect occurred only when the information was clearly indicative of communal attributes (Study 1) and when it could be unambiguously attributed to the female manager (Study 2); furthermore, these penalties were averted when communality was conveyed by role information (motherhood status) or by behavior (Study 3). These findings support the idea that penalties for women's success in male domains result from the perceived violation of gender-stereotypic prescriptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-92
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Hostility
Prescriptions

Keywords

  • Communal prescriptions
  • Penalties for success
  • Prescriptive gender stereotypes
  • Sex discrimination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. / Heilman, Madeline; Okimoto, Tyler G.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 81-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09ed275f03ca4cad9d61e207376df2fd,
title = "Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit",
abstract = "In 3 experimental studies, the authors tested the idea that penalties women incur for success in traditionally male areas arise from a perceived deficit in nurturing and socially sensitive communal attributes that is implied by their success. The authors therefore expected that providing information of communality would prevent these penalties. Results indicated that the negativity directed at successful female managers - in ratings of likability, interpersonal hostility, and boss desirability - was mitigated when there was indication that they were communal. This ameliorative effect occurred only when the information was clearly indicative of communal attributes (Study 1) and when it could be unambiguously attributed to the female manager (Study 2); furthermore, these penalties were averted when communality was conveyed by role information (motherhood status) or by behavior (Study 3). These findings support the idea that penalties for women's success in male domains result from the perceived violation of gender-stereotypic prescriptions.",
keywords = "Communal prescriptions, Penalties for success, Prescriptive gender stereotypes, Sex discrimination",
author = "Madeline Heilman and Okimoto, {Tyler G.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "81--92",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?

T2 - The implied communality deficit

AU - Heilman, Madeline

AU - Okimoto, Tyler G.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - In 3 experimental studies, the authors tested the idea that penalties women incur for success in traditionally male areas arise from a perceived deficit in nurturing and socially sensitive communal attributes that is implied by their success. The authors therefore expected that providing information of communality would prevent these penalties. Results indicated that the negativity directed at successful female managers - in ratings of likability, interpersonal hostility, and boss desirability - was mitigated when there was indication that they were communal. This ameliorative effect occurred only when the information was clearly indicative of communal attributes (Study 1) and when it could be unambiguously attributed to the female manager (Study 2); furthermore, these penalties were averted when communality was conveyed by role information (motherhood status) or by behavior (Study 3). These findings support the idea that penalties for women's success in male domains result from the perceived violation of gender-stereotypic prescriptions.

AB - In 3 experimental studies, the authors tested the idea that penalties women incur for success in traditionally male areas arise from a perceived deficit in nurturing and socially sensitive communal attributes that is implied by their success. The authors therefore expected that providing information of communality would prevent these penalties. Results indicated that the negativity directed at successful female managers - in ratings of likability, interpersonal hostility, and boss desirability - was mitigated when there was indication that they were communal. This ameliorative effect occurred only when the information was clearly indicative of communal attributes (Study 1) and when it could be unambiguously attributed to the female manager (Study 2); furthermore, these penalties were averted when communality was conveyed by role information (motherhood status) or by behavior (Study 3). These findings support the idea that penalties for women's success in male domains result from the perceived violation of gender-stereotypic prescriptions.

KW - Communal prescriptions

KW - Penalties for success

KW - Prescriptive gender stereotypes

KW - Sex discrimination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846298482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846298482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81

M3 - Article

C2 - 17227153

AN - SCOPUS:33846298482

VL - 92

SP - 81

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 1

ER -