Who's worried about turkeys? How 'organisational silos' impede zoonotic disease surveillance

Colin Jerolmack

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Though emerging infectious diseases ignore boundaries between species, the agencies that respond to them do not. Based on interviews with state and federal epidemiologists, veterinarians, and physicians and on case studies of disease events, this article examines how the jurisdictional and cultural divides that exist among human and animal health agencies hinder efforts to successfully contain species-jumping diseases (zoonoses). I argue that newly emergent zoonoses make these agencies' organisational cultures function as silos because the institutionalised thinking and practices developed to address the diseases that traditionally concerned each agency constrain members from building the inter-organisational bridges required to manage the latest 'hybrid' diseases. The silo effect is evident both across the human-animal health divide and within the landscape of animal health, as agencies that monitor livestock and wildlife follow distinct and sometimes competing agendas. The article also touches on moments of inter-agency cooperation in order to specify how health practitioners can begin making connections between 'organisational silos'. This article encourages sociologists of health to explore the crucial link between animal and human health; and it introduces the concept of organisational silos to capture the relational dilemmas that arise when a 'hybrid' problem systemically links agencies with disparate organisational cultures.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)200-212
    Number of pages13
    JournalSociology of Health and Illness
    Volume35
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2013

    Fingerprint

    Zoonoses
    surveillance
    Turkey
    Disease
    Health
    animal
    health
    Organizational Culture
    organizational culture
    Emerging Communicable Diseases
    Veterinarians
    Livestock
    sociologist
    contagious disease
    physician
    Interviews
    Physicians
    event
    interview

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Health Policy
    • Health(social science)

    Cite this

    Who's worried about turkeys? How 'organisational silos' impede zoonotic disease surveillance. / Jerolmack, Colin.

    In: Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 35, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 200-212.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{c2fd2dc0aa2d4265a251bcb34dcb1076,
    title = "Who's worried about turkeys? How 'organisational silos' impede zoonotic disease surveillance",
    abstract = "Though emerging infectious diseases ignore boundaries between species, the agencies that respond to them do not. Based on interviews with state and federal epidemiologists, veterinarians, and physicians and on case studies of disease events, this article examines how the jurisdictional and cultural divides that exist among human and animal health agencies hinder efforts to successfully contain species-jumping diseases (zoonoses). I argue that newly emergent zoonoses make these agencies' organisational cultures function as silos because the institutionalised thinking and practices developed to address the diseases that traditionally concerned each agency constrain members from building the inter-organisational bridges required to manage the latest 'hybrid' diseases. The silo effect is evident both across the human-animal health divide and within the landscape of animal health, as agencies that monitor livestock and wildlife follow distinct and sometimes competing agendas. The article also touches on moments of inter-agency cooperation in order to specify how health practitioners can begin making connections between 'organisational silos'. This article encourages sociologists of health to explore the crucial link between animal and human health; and it introduces the concept of organisational silos to capture the relational dilemmas that arise when a 'hybrid' problem systemically links agencies with disparate organisational cultures.",
    author = "Colin Jerolmack",
    year = "2013",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01501.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "200--212",
    journal = "Sociology of Health and Illness",
    issn = "0141-9889",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Who's worried about turkeys? How 'organisational silos' impede zoonotic disease surveillance

    AU - Jerolmack, Colin

    PY - 2013/2

    Y1 - 2013/2

    N2 - Though emerging infectious diseases ignore boundaries between species, the agencies that respond to them do not. Based on interviews with state and federal epidemiologists, veterinarians, and physicians and on case studies of disease events, this article examines how the jurisdictional and cultural divides that exist among human and animal health agencies hinder efforts to successfully contain species-jumping diseases (zoonoses). I argue that newly emergent zoonoses make these agencies' organisational cultures function as silos because the institutionalised thinking and practices developed to address the diseases that traditionally concerned each agency constrain members from building the inter-organisational bridges required to manage the latest 'hybrid' diseases. The silo effect is evident both across the human-animal health divide and within the landscape of animal health, as agencies that monitor livestock and wildlife follow distinct and sometimes competing agendas. The article also touches on moments of inter-agency cooperation in order to specify how health practitioners can begin making connections between 'organisational silos'. This article encourages sociologists of health to explore the crucial link between animal and human health; and it introduces the concept of organisational silos to capture the relational dilemmas that arise when a 'hybrid' problem systemically links agencies with disparate organisational cultures.

    AB - Though emerging infectious diseases ignore boundaries between species, the agencies that respond to them do not. Based on interviews with state and federal epidemiologists, veterinarians, and physicians and on case studies of disease events, this article examines how the jurisdictional and cultural divides that exist among human and animal health agencies hinder efforts to successfully contain species-jumping diseases (zoonoses). I argue that newly emergent zoonoses make these agencies' organisational cultures function as silos because the institutionalised thinking and practices developed to address the diseases that traditionally concerned each agency constrain members from building the inter-organisational bridges required to manage the latest 'hybrid' diseases. The silo effect is evident both across the human-animal health divide and within the landscape of animal health, as agencies that monitor livestock and wildlife follow distinct and sometimes competing agendas. The article also touches on moments of inter-agency cooperation in order to specify how health practitioners can begin making connections between 'organisational silos'. This article encourages sociologists of health to explore the crucial link between animal and human health; and it introduces the concept of organisational silos to capture the relational dilemmas that arise when a 'hybrid' problem systemically links agencies with disparate organisational cultures.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875517943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875517943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01501.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01501.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 200

    EP - 212

    JO - Sociology of Health and Illness

    JF - Sociology of Health and Illness

    SN - 0141-9889

    IS - 2

    ER -