Who Feels Included in School? Examining Feelings of Inclusion Among Students With Disabilities

Leanna Stiefel, Menbere Shiferaw, Amy Ellen Schwartz, Michael Gottfried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The passage of landmark federal legislation in 1975 guaranteed students with disabilities (SWDs) a free appropriate public education. Over time, reauthorization of this legislation has highlighted the importance of educating SWDs in the general education environment where appropriate, and significant interaction with general education peers who are not receiving special education services (GENs) has followed. The largest U.S. school district—New York City (NYC), the setting of our study—mirrors this national trend toward more inclusive environments. Despite the trend, a critical question remains: Does inclusion in fact feel inclusive? This study provides a district-wide descriptive analysis of feelings of inclusion among SWDs compared to their GEN peers. We rely on detailed, longitudinal administrative and student survey data on approximately 249,000 NYC middle school students attending schools that educate both SWDs and GENs (which we call traditional schools in contrast with schools that educate only SWDs). Our results suggest that while gaps between SWDs overall and GENs are quite small, there is some heterogeneity. Specifically, students with an emotional disturbance (ED) and other health impairments (OH) feel modestly less included with peers but more with adults. There are, however, almost no differences in feelings of inclusion between students assigned exclusive and inclusive services, even for those in the ED and OH groups. In fact, for students with low incidence (LI) disabilities, feelings of inclusion are slightly better when assigned exclusive services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-120
Number of pages16
JournalEducational Researcher
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

disability
inclusion
school
student
general education
legislation
public education
trend
health
special education
incidence
district
interaction

Keywords

  • correlational analysis
  • descriptive analysis
  • econometric analysis
  • education policy
  • learning environments
  • longitudinal studies
  • mainstreaming
  • middle schools
  • regression analyses
  • secondary data analysis
  • special education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Who Feels Included in School? Examining Feelings of Inclusion Among Students With Disabilities. / Stiefel, Leanna; Shiferaw, Menbere; Schwartz, Amy Ellen; Gottfried, Michael.

In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 105-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stiefel, Leanna ; Shiferaw, Menbere ; Schwartz, Amy Ellen ; Gottfried, Michael. / Who Feels Included in School? Examining Feelings of Inclusion Among Students With Disabilities. In: Educational Researcher. 2018 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 105-120.
@article{e41b2046f5384853953dff928c4cbe57,
title = "Who Feels Included in School? Examining Feelings of Inclusion Among Students With Disabilities",
abstract = "The passage of landmark federal legislation in 1975 guaranteed students with disabilities (SWDs) a free appropriate public education. Over time, reauthorization of this legislation has highlighted the importance of educating SWDs in the general education environment where appropriate, and significant interaction with general education peers who are not receiving special education services (GENs) has followed. The largest U.S. school district—New York City (NYC), the setting of our study—mirrors this national trend toward more inclusive environments. Despite the trend, a critical question remains: Does inclusion in fact feel inclusive? This study provides a district-wide descriptive analysis of feelings of inclusion among SWDs compared to their GEN peers. We rely on detailed, longitudinal administrative and student survey data on approximately 249,000 NYC middle school students attending schools that educate both SWDs and GENs (which we call traditional schools in contrast with schools that educate only SWDs). Our results suggest that while gaps between SWDs overall and GENs are quite small, there is some heterogeneity. Specifically, students with an emotional disturbance (ED) and other health impairments (OH) feel modestly less included with peers but more with adults. There are, however, almost no differences in feelings of inclusion between students assigned exclusive and inclusive services, even for those in the ED and OH groups. In fact, for students with low incidence (LI) disabilities, feelings of inclusion are slightly better when assigned exclusive services.",
keywords = "correlational analysis, descriptive analysis, econometric analysis, education policy, learning environments, longitudinal studies, mainstreaming, middle schools, regression analyses, secondary data analysis, special education",
author = "Leanna Stiefel and Menbere Shiferaw and Schwartz, {Amy Ellen} and Michael Gottfried",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3102/0013189X17738761",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "105--120",
journal = "Educational Researcher",
issn = "0013-189X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Feels Included in School? Examining Feelings of Inclusion Among Students With Disabilities

AU - Stiefel, Leanna

AU - Shiferaw, Menbere

AU - Schwartz, Amy Ellen

AU - Gottfried, Michael

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - The passage of landmark federal legislation in 1975 guaranteed students with disabilities (SWDs) a free appropriate public education. Over time, reauthorization of this legislation has highlighted the importance of educating SWDs in the general education environment where appropriate, and significant interaction with general education peers who are not receiving special education services (GENs) has followed. The largest U.S. school district—New York City (NYC), the setting of our study—mirrors this national trend toward more inclusive environments. Despite the trend, a critical question remains: Does inclusion in fact feel inclusive? This study provides a district-wide descriptive analysis of feelings of inclusion among SWDs compared to their GEN peers. We rely on detailed, longitudinal administrative and student survey data on approximately 249,000 NYC middle school students attending schools that educate both SWDs and GENs (which we call traditional schools in contrast with schools that educate only SWDs). Our results suggest that while gaps between SWDs overall and GENs are quite small, there is some heterogeneity. Specifically, students with an emotional disturbance (ED) and other health impairments (OH) feel modestly less included with peers but more with adults. There are, however, almost no differences in feelings of inclusion between students assigned exclusive and inclusive services, even for those in the ED and OH groups. In fact, for students with low incidence (LI) disabilities, feelings of inclusion are slightly better when assigned exclusive services.

AB - The passage of landmark federal legislation in 1975 guaranteed students with disabilities (SWDs) a free appropriate public education. Over time, reauthorization of this legislation has highlighted the importance of educating SWDs in the general education environment where appropriate, and significant interaction with general education peers who are not receiving special education services (GENs) has followed. The largest U.S. school district—New York City (NYC), the setting of our study—mirrors this national trend toward more inclusive environments. Despite the trend, a critical question remains: Does inclusion in fact feel inclusive? This study provides a district-wide descriptive analysis of feelings of inclusion among SWDs compared to their GEN peers. We rely on detailed, longitudinal administrative and student survey data on approximately 249,000 NYC middle school students attending schools that educate both SWDs and GENs (which we call traditional schools in contrast with schools that educate only SWDs). Our results suggest that while gaps between SWDs overall and GENs are quite small, there is some heterogeneity. Specifically, students with an emotional disturbance (ED) and other health impairments (OH) feel modestly less included with peers but more with adults. There are, however, almost no differences in feelings of inclusion between students assigned exclusive and inclusive services, even for those in the ED and OH groups. In fact, for students with low incidence (LI) disabilities, feelings of inclusion are slightly better when assigned exclusive services.

KW - correlational analysis

KW - descriptive analysis

KW - econometric analysis

KW - education policy

KW - learning environments

KW - longitudinal studies

KW - mainstreaming

KW - middle schools

KW - regression analyses

KW - secondary data analysis

KW - special education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042062558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042062558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3102/0013189X17738761

DO - 10.3102/0013189X17738761

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042062558

VL - 47

SP - 105

EP - 120

JO - Educational Researcher

JF - Educational Researcher

SN - 0013-189X

IS - 2

ER -