White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity

Eric D. Knowles, Kaiping Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article addresses the nature and measurement of White racial identity. White identification is conceptualized as an automatic association between the self and the White ingroup; this association is fostered through social exposure to non-Whites and serves to link self- and ingroup evaluations. Four studies validated a measure of White identification against criteria derived from this model. In Study 1, the White Identity Centrality Implicit Association Test (WICIAT) predicted response latencies in a task gauging self-ingroup merging. In Study 2, the WICIAT correlated with census data tapping exposure to non-Whites. In Studies 3 and 4, the WICIAT predicted phenomena associated with the linking of self-and ingroup evaluations: identity-related biases in intergroup categorization (Study 3) and self-evaluative emotional reactions to ingroup transgressions (Study 4). Together, the findings shed light on the antecedents and consequences of White identity, an often-neglected individual difference construct.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-241
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Ego
Censuses
Individuality
Reaction Time
Group
evaluation
Identification (Psychology)
census
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

White selves : Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. / Knowles, Eric D.; Peng, Kaiping.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 2, 08.2005, p. 223-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2727664c5de546b8af1936a088a8a041,
title = "White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity",
abstract = "This article addresses the nature and measurement of White racial identity. White identification is conceptualized as an automatic association between the self and the White ingroup; this association is fostered through social exposure to non-Whites and serves to link self- and ingroup evaluations. Four studies validated a measure of White identification against criteria derived from this model. In Study 1, the White Identity Centrality Implicit Association Test (WICIAT) predicted response latencies in a task gauging self-ingroup merging. In Study 2, the WICIAT correlated with census data tapping exposure to non-Whites. In Studies 3 and 4, the WICIAT predicted phenomena associated with the linking of self-and ingroup evaluations: identity-related biases in intergroup categorization (Study 3) and self-evaluative emotional reactions to ingroup transgressions (Study 4). Together, the findings shed light on the antecedents and consequences of White identity, an often-neglected individual difference construct.",
author = "Knowles, {Eric D.} and Kaiping Peng",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "223--241",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - White selves

T2 - Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity

AU - Knowles, Eric D.

AU - Peng, Kaiping

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - This article addresses the nature and measurement of White racial identity. White identification is conceptualized as an automatic association between the self and the White ingroup; this association is fostered through social exposure to non-Whites and serves to link self- and ingroup evaluations. Four studies validated a measure of White identification against criteria derived from this model. In Study 1, the White Identity Centrality Implicit Association Test (WICIAT) predicted response latencies in a task gauging self-ingroup merging. In Study 2, the WICIAT correlated with census data tapping exposure to non-Whites. In Studies 3 and 4, the WICIAT predicted phenomena associated with the linking of self-and ingroup evaluations: identity-related biases in intergroup categorization (Study 3) and self-evaluative emotional reactions to ingroup transgressions (Study 4). Together, the findings shed light on the antecedents and consequences of White identity, an often-neglected individual difference construct.

AB - This article addresses the nature and measurement of White racial identity. White identification is conceptualized as an automatic association between the self and the White ingroup; this association is fostered through social exposure to non-Whites and serves to link self- and ingroup evaluations. Four studies validated a measure of White identification against criteria derived from this model. In Study 1, the White Identity Centrality Implicit Association Test (WICIAT) predicted response latencies in a task gauging self-ingroup merging. In Study 2, the WICIAT correlated with census data tapping exposure to non-Whites. In Studies 3 and 4, the WICIAT predicted phenomena associated with the linking of self-and ingroup evaluations: identity-related biases in intergroup categorization (Study 3) and self-evaluative emotional reactions to ingroup transgressions (Study 4). Together, the findings shed light on the antecedents and consequences of White identity, an often-neglected individual difference construct.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144498994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144498994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 223

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -