Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies

Ted Brader, Joshua Tucker, Dominik Duell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Political parties not only aggregate the policy preferences of their supporters, but also have the ability to shape those preferences. Experimental evidence demonstrates that, when parties stake out positions on policy issues, partisans become more likely to adopt these positions, whether out of blind loyalty or because they infer that party endorsements signal options consistent with their interests or values. It is equally clear, however, that partisans do not always follow their party's lead. The authors investigate the impact of three party-level traits on partisan cue taking: longevity, incumbency, and ideological clarity. As parties age, voters may become more certain of both the party's reputation and their own allegiance. Governing parties must take action and respond to events, increasing the likelihood of compromise and failure, and therefore may dilute their reputation and disappoint followers. Incumbency aside, some parties exhibit greater ambiguity in their ideological position than other parties, undermining voter certainty about the meaning of cues. The authors test these hypotheses with experiments conducted in three multiparty democracies (Poland, Hungary, and Great Britain). They find that partisans more strongly follow their party's lead when that party is older, in the opposition, or has developed a more consistent ideological image. However, the impact of longevity vanishes when the other factors are taken into account. Underscoring the importance of voter (un)certainty, ideologically coherent opposition parties have the greatest capacity to shape the policy views of followers.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1485-1517
    Number of pages33
    JournalComparative Political Studies
    Volume46
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2013

    Fingerprint

    follower
    reputation
    voter
    opposition
    democracy
    loyalty
    Hungary
    compromise
    evidence
    Poland
    event
    experiment
    ability
    Values

    Keywords

    • Great B.
    • Hungary
    • partisanship
    • party cues
    • Poland
    • political parties
    • public opinion
    • survey experiments

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies. / Brader, Ted; Tucker, Joshua; Duell, Dominik.

    In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 46, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 1485-1517.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Brader, Ted ; Tucker, Joshua ; Duell, Dominik. / Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies. In: Comparative Political Studies. 2013 ; Vol. 46, No. 11. pp. 1485-1517.
    @article{7ac82f0a7ef1452181af3f07baac0ecf,
    title = "Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies",
    abstract = "Political parties not only aggregate the policy preferences of their supporters, but also have the ability to shape those preferences. Experimental evidence demonstrates that, when parties stake out positions on policy issues, partisans become more likely to adopt these positions, whether out of blind loyalty or because they infer that party endorsements signal options consistent with their interests or values. It is equally clear, however, that partisans do not always follow their party's lead. The authors investigate the impact of three party-level traits on partisan cue taking: longevity, incumbency, and ideological clarity. As parties age, voters may become more certain of both the party's reputation and their own allegiance. Governing parties must take action and respond to events, increasing the likelihood of compromise and failure, and therefore may dilute their reputation and disappoint followers. Incumbency aside, some parties exhibit greater ambiguity in their ideological position than other parties, undermining voter certainty about the meaning of cues. The authors test these hypotheses with experiments conducted in three multiparty democracies (Poland, Hungary, and Great Britain). They find that partisans more strongly follow their party's lead when that party is older, in the opposition, or has developed a more consistent ideological image. However, the impact of longevity vanishes when the other factors are taken into account. Underscoring the importance of voter (un)certainty, ideologically coherent opposition parties have the greatest capacity to shape the policy views of followers.",
    keywords = "Great B., Hungary, partisanship, party cues, Poland, political parties, public opinion, survey experiments",
    author = "Ted Brader and Joshua Tucker and Dominik Duell",
    year = "2013",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1177/0010414012453452",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "46",
    pages = "1485--1517",
    journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
    issn = "0010-4140",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "11",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies

    AU - Brader, Ted

    AU - Tucker, Joshua

    AU - Duell, Dominik

    PY - 2013/11

    Y1 - 2013/11

    N2 - Political parties not only aggregate the policy preferences of their supporters, but also have the ability to shape those preferences. Experimental evidence demonstrates that, when parties stake out positions on policy issues, partisans become more likely to adopt these positions, whether out of blind loyalty or because they infer that party endorsements signal options consistent with their interests or values. It is equally clear, however, that partisans do not always follow their party's lead. The authors investigate the impact of three party-level traits on partisan cue taking: longevity, incumbency, and ideological clarity. As parties age, voters may become more certain of both the party's reputation and their own allegiance. Governing parties must take action and respond to events, increasing the likelihood of compromise and failure, and therefore may dilute their reputation and disappoint followers. Incumbency aside, some parties exhibit greater ambiguity in their ideological position than other parties, undermining voter certainty about the meaning of cues. The authors test these hypotheses with experiments conducted in three multiparty democracies (Poland, Hungary, and Great Britain). They find that partisans more strongly follow their party's lead when that party is older, in the opposition, or has developed a more consistent ideological image. However, the impact of longevity vanishes when the other factors are taken into account. Underscoring the importance of voter (un)certainty, ideologically coherent opposition parties have the greatest capacity to shape the policy views of followers.

    AB - Political parties not only aggregate the policy preferences of their supporters, but also have the ability to shape those preferences. Experimental evidence demonstrates that, when parties stake out positions on policy issues, partisans become more likely to adopt these positions, whether out of blind loyalty or because they infer that party endorsements signal options consistent with their interests or values. It is equally clear, however, that partisans do not always follow their party's lead. The authors investigate the impact of three party-level traits on partisan cue taking: longevity, incumbency, and ideological clarity. As parties age, voters may become more certain of both the party's reputation and their own allegiance. Governing parties must take action and respond to events, increasing the likelihood of compromise and failure, and therefore may dilute their reputation and disappoint followers. Incumbency aside, some parties exhibit greater ambiguity in their ideological position than other parties, undermining voter certainty about the meaning of cues. The authors test these hypotheses with experiments conducted in three multiparty democracies (Poland, Hungary, and Great Britain). They find that partisans more strongly follow their party's lead when that party is older, in the opposition, or has developed a more consistent ideological image. However, the impact of longevity vanishes when the other factors are taken into account. Underscoring the importance of voter (un)certainty, ideologically coherent opposition parties have the greatest capacity to shape the policy views of followers.

    KW - Great B.

    KW - Hungary

    KW - partisanship

    KW - party cues

    KW - Poland

    KW - political parties

    KW - public opinion

    KW - survey experiments

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886399382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886399382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0010414012453452

    DO - 10.1177/0010414012453452

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84886399382

    VL - 46

    SP - 1485

    EP - 1517

    JO - Comparative Political Studies

    JF - Comparative Political Studies

    SN - 0010-4140

    IS - 11

    ER -