Which AB scale? An extension

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The AB therapist “type” distinction appears to have potential for predicting differential therapeutic success. However, the proliferation of versions of the AB scale has led to confusion. In a recent attempt to reduce this confusion, Kemp and Stephens conducted a comparative analysis of nine different versions of the AB scale and recommended the continued use of three of these versions. The present investigation assessed the accuracy with which these three AB scale versions identify the same individual as an A or B. Considerable equivalence in predictive efficiency was found between the original Whitehorn-Betz 23-item version and a frequently used modification; however, the Campbell et al. 80-item revision was only minimally related to the other two versions, a finding which may account for recent contradictory findings using this version. Caution is recommended in future utilization of this latter revision as an assessment device presumably tapping similar aspects of cognitive-behavioral style as the scale versions used in other investigations of the AB therapist-type dimension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-109
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume155
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1972

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Which AB scale? An extension. / Seidman, Edward.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 155, No. 2, 1972, p. 105-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7a81a40e33624dc08629c7a3af94b58b,
title = "Which AB scale? An extension",
abstract = "The AB therapist “type” distinction appears to have potential for predicting differential therapeutic success. However, the proliferation of versions of the AB scale has led to confusion. In a recent attempt to reduce this confusion, Kemp and Stephens conducted a comparative analysis of nine different versions of the AB scale and recommended the continued use of three of these versions. The present investigation assessed the accuracy with which these three AB scale versions identify the same individual as an A or B. Considerable equivalence in predictive efficiency was found between the original Whitehorn-Betz 23-item version and a frequently used modification; however, the Campbell et al. 80-item revision was only minimally related to the other two versions, a finding which may account for recent contradictory findings using this version. Caution is recommended in future utilization of this latter revision as an assessment device presumably tapping similar aspects of cognitive-behavioral style as the scale versions used in other investigations of the AB therapist-type dimension.",
author = "Edward Seidman",
year = "1972",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "105--109",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which AB scale? An extension

AU - Seidman, Edward

PY - 1972

Y1 - 1972

N2 - The AB therapist “type” distinction appears to have potential for predicting differential therapeutic success. However, the proliferation of versions of the AB scale has led to confusion. In a recent attempt to reduce this confusion, Kemp and Stephens conducted a comparative analysis of nine different versions of the AB scale and recommended the continued use of three of these versions. The present investigation assessed the accuracy with which these three AB scale versions identify the same individual as an A or B. Considerable equivalence in predictive efficiency was found between the original Whitehorn-Betz 23-item version and a frequently used modification; however, the Campbell et al. 80-item revision was only minimally related to the other two versions, a finding which may account for recent contradictory findings using this version. Caution is recommended in future utilization of this latter revision as an assessment device presumably tapping similar aspects of cognitive-behavioral style as the scale versions used in other investigations of the AB therapist-type dimension.

AB - The AB therapist “type” distinction appears to have potential for predicting differential therapeutic success. However, the proliferation of versions of the AB scale has led to confusion. In a recent attempt to reduce this confusion, Kemp and Stephens conducted a comparative analysis of nine different versions of the AB scale and recommended the continued use of three of these versions. The present investigation assessed the accuracy with which these three AB scale versions identify the same individual as an A or B. Considerable equivalence in predictive efficiency was found between the original Whitehorn-Betz 23-item version and a frequently used modification; however, the Campbell et al. 80-item revision was only minimally related to the other two versions, a finding which may account for recent contradictory findings using this version. Caution is recommended in future utilization of this latter revision as an assessment device presumably tapping similar aspects of cognitive-behavioral style as the scale versions used in other investigations of the AB therapist-type dimension.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0015376575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0015376575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 155

SP - 105

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 2

ER -