When the Creampuff beat the boxer

Working memory, cost, and function in reading metaphoric reference

Amit Almor, Sudha Arunachalam, Brent Strickland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Following Almor's (1999) cost-function analysis of referential processing, we hypothesized that reading times of metaphoric anaphors are affected by readers' working memory ability and reflect a balance between discourse function and processing cost. The results from 2 self-paced reading experiments supported this hypothesis. Low-span participants always read sentences with metaphoric anaphors slower than sentences with literal anaphors. In contrast, high-span participants did not take longer to read sentences with metaphoric anaphors than those with literal anaphors when the preceding context activated enough information to facilitate reference resolution. However, when the context activated so much information that the metaphor's function was obviated, high-span readers suffered and again read sentences with metaphoric anaphors more slowly than sentences with literal anaphors. These results show that, as with other types of anaphors, processing metaphoric anaphors is affected by working memory performance, and that the balance between processing cost and discourse function varies with working memory ability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-193
Number of pages25
JournalMetaphor and Symbol
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 20 2008

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Reading
Aptitude
Data storage equipment
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
Processing
Costs
Metaphor
discourse
ability
Cost functions
metaphor
experiment
performance
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

When the Creampuff beat the boxer : Working memory, cost, and function in reading metaphoric reference. / Almor, Amit; Arunachalam, Sudha; Strickland, Brent.

In: Metaphor and Symbol, Vol. 22, No. 2, 20.03.2008, p. 169-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27665229b29b4c58b43f64926b7a32e8,
title = "When the Creampuff beat the boxer: Working memory, cost, and function in reading metaphoric reference",
abstract = "Following Almor's (1999) cost-function analysis of referential processing, we hypothesized that reading times of metaphoric anaphors are affected by readers' working memory ability and reflect a balance between discourse function and processing cost. The results from 2 self-paced reading experiments supported this hypothesis. Low-span participants always read sentences with metaphoric anaphors slower than sentences with literal anaphors. In contrast, high-span participants did not take longer to read sentences with metaphoric anaphors than those with literal anaphors when the preceding context activated enough information to facilitate reference resolution. However, when the context activated so much information that the metaphor's function was obviated, high-span readers suffered and again read sentences with metaphoric anaphors more slowly than sentences with literal anaphors. These results show that, as with other types of anaphors, processing metaphoric anaphors is affected by working memory performance, and that the balance between processing cost and discourse function varies with working memory ability.",
author = "Amit Almor and Sudha Arunachalam and Brent Strickland",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/10926480701235478",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "169--193",
journal = "Metaphor and Symbol",
issn = "1092-6488",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the Creampuff beat the boxer

T2 - Working memory, cost, and function in reading metaphoric reference

AU - Almor, Amit

AU - Arunachalam, Sudha

AU - Strickland, Brent

PY - 2008/3/20

Y1 - 2008/3/20

N2 - Following Almor's (1999) cost-function analysis of referential processing, we hypothesized that reading times of metaphoric anaphors are affected by readers' working memory ability and reflect a balance between discourse function and processing cost. The results from 2 self-paced reading experiments supported this hypothesis. Low-span participants always read sentences with metaphoric anaphors slower than sentences with literal anaphors. In contrast, high-span participants did not take longer to read sentences with metaphoric anaphors than those with literal anaphors when the preceding context activated enough information to facilitate reference resolution. However, when the context activated so much information that the metaphor's function was obviated, high-span readers suffered and again read sentences with metaphoric anaphors more slowly than sentences with literal anaphors. These results show that, as with other types of anaphors, processing metaphoric anaphors is affected by working memory performance, and that the balance between processing cost and discourse function varies with working memory ability.

AB - Following Almor's (1999) cost-function analysis of referential processing, we hypothesized that reading times of metaphoric anaphors are affected by readers' working memory ability and reflect a balance between discourse function and processing cost. The results from 2 self-paced reading experiments supported this hypothesis. Low-span participants always read sentences with metaphoric anaphors slower than sentences with literal anaphors. In contrast, high-span participants did not take longer to read sentences with metaphoric anaphors than those with literal anaphors when the preceding context activated enough information to facilitate reference resolution. However, when the context activated so much information that the metaphor's function was obviated, high-span readers suffered and again read sentences with metaphoric anaphors more slowly than sentences with literal anaphors. These results show that, as with other types of anaphors, processing metaphoric anaphors is affected by working memory performance, and that the balance between processing cost and discourse function varies with working memory ability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41449110019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41449110019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10926480701235478

DO - 10.1080/10926480701235478

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 169

EP - 193

JO - Metaphor and Symbol

JF - Metaphor and Symbol

SN - 1092-6488

IS - 2

ER -