When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Five experiments were performed to investigate the category-based generalization of nonblank properties, properties that were novel but that were attributed to existing category features with causal explanations. Experiments 1-3 tested how such explanations interact with the well-known effects of similarity on such generalizations. The results showed that when the causal explanations were used, standard effects of typicality (Experiment 1), diversity (Experiment 2), or similarity itself (Experiment 3) were almost completely eliminated. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that category-based generalizations exhibit some of the standard properties of causal reasoning; for example, an effect (i.e., a novel category property) is judged to be more prevalent when its cause (i.e., an existing category feature) is also prevalent. These findings suggest that category-based property generalization is often an instance of causal inference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-16
Number of pages14
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume34
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Causality
Experiment
Causal Explanation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization. / Rehder, Robert.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 3-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02ffe1642384475ca1fe2e74490e7f6c,
title = "When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization",
abstract = "Five experiments were performed to investigate the category-based generalization of nonblank properties, properties that were novel but that were attributed to existing category features with causal explanations. Experiments 1-3 tested how such explanations interact with the well-known effects of similarity on such generalizations. The results showed that when the causal explanations were used, standard effects of typicality (Experiment 1), diversity (Experiment 2), or similarity itself (Experiment 3) were almost completely eliminated. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that category-based generalizations exhibit some of the standard properties of causal reasoning; for example, an effect (i.e., a novel category property) is judged to be more prevalent when its cause (i.e., an existing category feature) is also prevalent. These findings suggest that category-based property generalization is often an instance of causal inference.",
author = "Robert Rehder",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "3--16",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization

AU - Rehder, Robert

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Five experiments were performed to investigate the category-based generalization of nonblank properties, properties that were novel but that were attributed to existing category features with causal explanations. Experiments 1-3 tested how such explanations interact with the well-known effects of similarity on such generalizations. The results showed that when the causal explanations were used, standard effects of typicality (Experiment 1), diversity (Experiment 2), or similarity itself (Experiment 3) were almost completely eliminated. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that category-based generalizations exhibit some of the standard properties of causal reasoning; for example, an effect (i.e., a novel category property) is judged to be more prevalent when its cause (i.e., an existing category feature) is also prevalent. These findings suggest that category-based property generalization is often an instance of causal inference.

AB - Five experiments were performed to investigate the category-based generalization of nonblank properties, properties that were novel but that were attributed to existing category features with causal explanations. Experiments 1-3 tested how such explanations interact with the well-known effects of similarity on such generalizations. The results showed that when the causal explanations were used, standard effects of typicality (Experiment 1), diversity (Experiment 2), or similarity itself (Experiment 3) were almost completely eliminated. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that category-based generalizations exhibit some of the standard properties of causal reasoning; for example, an effect (i.e., a novel category property) is judged to be more prevalent when its cause (i.e., an existing category feature) is also prevalent. These findings suggest that category-based property generalization is often an instance of causal inference.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745952004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745952004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 3

EP - 16

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -