When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind: Neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering

Lila Davachi, Anat Maril, Anthony D. Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ability to bring to mind a past experience depends on the cognitive and neural processes that are engaged during the experience and that support memory formation. A central and much debated question is whether the processes that underlie rote verbal rehearsal - that is, working memory mechanisms that keep information in mind - impact memory formation and subsequent remembering. The present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the relation between working memory, maintenance operations and long-term memory. Specifically, we investigated whether the magnitude of activation in neural regions supporting the on-line maintenance of verbal codes is predictive of subsequent memory for words that were rote-rehearsed during learning. Furthermore, during rote rehearsal, the extent of neural activation in regions associated with semantic retrieval was assessed to determine the role that incidental semantic elaboration may play in subsequent memory for rote-rehearsed items. Results revealed that (a) the magnitude of activation in neural regions previously associated with phonological rehearsal (left prefrontal, bilateral parietal, supplementary motor, and cerebellar regions) was correlated with subsequent memory, and (b) while rote rehearsal did not - on average - elicit activation in an anterior left prefrontal region associated with semantic retrieval, activation in this region was greater for trials that were subsequently better remembered. Contrary to the prevalent view that rote rehearsal does not impact learning, these data suggest that phonological maintenance mechanisms, in addition to semantic elaboration, support the encoding of an experience such that it can be later remembered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1059-1070
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2001

Fingerprint

Semantics
Maintenance
Short-Term Memory
Learning
Aptitude
Long-Term Memory
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind : Neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering. / Davachi, Lila; Maril, Anat; Wagner, Anthony D.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. 8, 15.11.2001, p. 1059-1070.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{822f20afff254a43a7caf34458624d18,
title = "When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind: Neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering",
abstract = "The ability to bring to mind a past experience depends on the cognitive and neural processes that are engaged during the experience and that support memory formation. A central and much debated question is whether the processes that underlie rote verbal rehearsal - that is, working memory mechanisms that keep information in mind - impact memory formation and subsequent remembering. The present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the relation between working memory, maintenance operations and long-term memory. Specifically, we investigated whether the magnitude of activation in neural regions supporting the on-line maintenance of verbal codes is predictive of subsequent memory for words that were rote-rehearsed during learning. Furthermore, during rote rehearsal, the extent of neural activation in regions associated with semantic retrieval was assessed to determine the role that incidental semantic elaboration may play in subsequent memory for rote-rehearsed items. Results revealed that (a) the magnitude of activation in neural regions previously associated with phonological rehearsal (left prefrontal, bilateral parietal, supplementary motor, and cerebellar regions) was correlated with subsequent memory, and (b) while rote rehearsal did not - on average - elicit activation in an anterior left prefrontal region associated with semantic retrieval, activation in this region was greater for trials that were subsequently better remembered. Contrary to the prevalent view that rote rehearsal does not impact learning, these data suggest that phonological maintenance mechanisms, in addition to semantic elaboration, support the encoding of an experience such that it can be later remembered.",
author = "Lila Davachi and Anat Maril and Wagner, {Anthony D.}",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1162/089892901753294356",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1059--1070",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind

T2 - Neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering

AU - Davachi, Lila

AU - Maril, Anat

AU - Wagner, Anthony D.

PY - 2001/11/15

Y1 - 2001/11/15

N2 - The ability to bring to mind a past experience depends on the cognitive and neural processes that are engaged during the experience and that support memory formation. A central and much debated question is whether the processes that underlie rote verbal rehearsal - that is, working memory mechanisms that keep information in mind - impact memory formation and subsequent remembering. The present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the relation between working memory, maintenance operations and long-term memory. Specifically, we investigated whether the magnitude of activation in neural regions supporting the on-line maintenance of verbal codes is predictive of subsequent memory for words that were rote-rehearsed during learning. Furthermore, during rote rehearsal, the extent of neural activation in regions associated with semantic retrieval was assessed to determine the role that incidental semantic elaboration may play in subsequent memory for rote-rehearsed items. Results revealed that (a) the magnitude of activation in neural regions previously associated with phonological rehearsal (left prefrontal, bilateral parietal, supplementary motor, and cerebellar regions) was correlated with subsequent memory, and (b) while rote rehearsal did not - on average - elicit activation in an anterior left prefrontal region associated with semantic retrieval, activation in this region was greater for trials that were subsequently better remembered. Contrary to the prevalent view that rote rehearsal does not impact learning, these data suggest that phonological maintenance mechanisms, in addition to semantic elaboration, support the encoding of an experience such that it can be later remembered.

AB - The ability to bring to mind a past experience depends on the cognitive and neural processes that are engaged during the experience and that support memory formation. A central and much debated question is whether the processes that underlie rote verbal rehearsal - that is, working memory mechanisms that keep information in mind - impact memory formation and subsequent remembering. The present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the relation between working memory, maintenance operations and long-term memory. Specifically, we investigated whether the magnitude of activation in neural regions supporting the on-line maintenance of verbal codes is predictive of subsequent memory for words that were rote-rehearsed during learning. Furthermore, during rote rehearsal, the extent of neural activation in regions associated with semantic retrieval was assessed to determine the role that incidental semantic elaboration may play in subsequent memory for rote-rehearsed items. Results revealed that (a) the magnitude of activation in neural regions previously associated with phonological rehearsal (left prefrontal, bilateral parietal, supplementary motor, and cerebellar regions) was correlated with subsequent memory, and (b) while rote rehearsal did not - on average - elicit activation in an anterior left prefrontal region associated with semantic retrieval, activation in this region was greater for trials that were subsequently better remembered. Contrary to the prevalent view that rote rehearsal does not impact learning, these data suggest that phonological maintenance mechanisms, in addition to semantic elaboration, support the encoding of an experience such that it can be later remembered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035891552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035891552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/089892901753294356

DO - 10.1162/089892901753294356

M3 - Article

C2 - 11784444

AN - SCOPUS:0035891552

VL - 13

SP - 1059

EP - 1070

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 8

ER -