When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers

Karen S. Lyness, Madeline Heilman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using archival organizational data, the authors examined relationships of gender and type of position (i.e., line or staff) to performance evaluations of 448 upper-level managers, and relationships of performance evaluations to promotions during the subsequent 2 years. Consistent with the idea that there is a greater perceived lack of fit between stereotypical attributes of women and requirements of line jobs than staff jobs, women in line jobs received lower performance ratings than women in staff jobs or men in either line or staff jobs. Moreover, promoted women had received higher performance ratings than promoted men and performance ratings were more strongly related to promotions for women than men, suggesting that women were held to stricter standards for promotion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-785
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume91
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

Keywords

  • Gender bias
  • Gender stereotypes
  • Glass ceiling
  • Performance appraisal
  • Promotion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

When fit is fundamental : Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. / Lyness, Karen S.; Heilman, Madeline.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 4, 07.2006, p. 777-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5f9d19420f44ae88e6afbcbfdb68211,
title = "When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers",
abstract = "Using archival organizational data, the authors examined relationships of gender and type of position (i.e., line or staff) to performance evaluations of 448 upper-level managers, and relationships of performance evaluations to promotions during the subsequent 2 years. Consistent with the idea that there is a greater perceived lack of fit between stereotypical attributes of women and requirements of line jobs than staff jobs, women in line jobs received lower performance ratings than women in staff jobs or men in either line or staff jobs. Moreover, promoted women had received higher performance ratings than promoted men and performance ratings were more strongly related to promotions for women than men, suggesting that women were held to stricter standards for promotion.",
keywords = "Gender bias, Gender stereotypes, Glass ceiling, Performance appraisal, Promotion",
author = "Lyness, {Karen S.} and Madeline Heilman",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "777--785",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When fit is fundamental

T2 - Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers

AU - Lyness, Karen S.

AU - Heilman, Madeline

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Using archival organizational data, the authors examined relationships of gender and type of position (i.e., line or staff) to performance evaluations of 448 upper-level managers, and relationships of performance evaluations to promotions during the subsequent 2 years. Consistent with the idea that there is a greater perceived lack of fit between stereotypical attributes of women and requirements of line jobs than staff jobs, women in line jobs received lower performance ratings than women in staff jobs or men in either line or staff jobs. Moreover, promoted women had received higher performance ratings than promoted men and performance ratings were more strongly related to promotions for women than men, suggesting that women were held to stricter standards for promotion.

AB - Using archival organizational data, the authors examined relationships of gender and type of position (i.e., line or staff) to performance evaluations of 448 upper-level managers, and relationships of performance evaluations to promotions during the subsequent 2 years. Consistent with the idea that there is a greater perceived lack of fit between stereotypical attributes of women and requirements of line jobs than staff jobs, women in line jobs received lower performance ratings than women in staff jobs or men in either line or staff jobs. Moreover, promoted women had received higher performance ratings than promoted men and performance ratings were more strongly related to promotions for women than men, suggesting that women were held to stricter standards for promotion.

KW - Gender bias

KW - Gender stereotypes

KW - Glass ceiling

KW - Performance appraisal

KW - Promotion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746390511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746390511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 777

EP - 785

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 4

ER -