When fish walk on land: Social history in a postmodern world

Nicole Eustace

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    When the "new social history" movement developed in early American studies around 1970 - with the near simultaneous publication of path-breaking work by John Demos, Philip Greven, Jr., Kenneth Lockridge, and Michael Zuckerman - critics hailed the arrival of a new more inclusive kind of bottom-up history, one that focused on the daily life of the "average man." But almost as quickly, they also began to worry about the problem of fragmentation and the related decline of narrative forms of historical writing. Now, more than thirty years later, scholars of early America are finding creative ways to reinvent the very idea of synthesis, offering new narratives that draw on postmodern theories of identity and power in order to integrate disparate elements of the historical record in fresh and exciting ways.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)77-91+283
    JournalJournal of Social History
    Volume37
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Sep 2003

    Fingerprint

    social history
    narrative
    fragmentation
    critic
    history
    Fish
    Bottom-up
    Social History
    Fragmentation
    History
    Historical Writing
    Daily Life
    American Studies
    Narrative Form
    Historical Records

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • History

    Cite this

    When fish walk on land : Social history in a postmodern world. / Eustace, Nicole.

    In: Journal of Social History, Vol. 37, No. 1, 09.2003, p. 77-91+283.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Eustace, Nicole. / When fish walk on land : Social history in a postmodern world. In: Journal of Social History. 2003 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 77-91+283.
    @article{051685b0ab5349718ffc5eb3f8a0b187,
    title = "When fish walk on land: Social history in a postmodern world",
    abstract = "When the {"}new social history{"} movement developed in early American studies around 1970 - with the near simultaneous publication of path-breaking work by John Demos, Philip Greven, Jr., Kenneth Lockridge, and Michael Zuckerman - critics hailed the arrival of a new more inclusive kind of bottom-up history, one that focused on the daily life of the {"}average man.{"} But almost as quickly, they also began to worry about the problem of fragmentation and the related decline of narrative forms of historical writing. Now, more than thirty years later, scholars of early America are finding creative ways to reinvent the very idea of synthesis, offering new narratives that draw on postmodern theories of identity and power in order to integrate disparate elements of the historical record in fresh and exciting ways.",
    author = "Nicole Eustace",
    year = "2003",
    month = "9",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "77--91+283",
    journal = "Journal of Social History",
    issn = "0022-4529",
    publisher = "George Mason University",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - When fish walk on land

    T2 - Social history in a postmodern world

    AU - Eustace, Nicole

    PY - 2003/9

    Y1 - 2003/9

    N2 - When the "new social history" movement developed in early American studies around 1970 - with the near simultaneous publication of path-breaking work by John Demos, Philip Greven, Jr., Kenneth Lockridge, and Michael Zuckerman - critics hailed the arrival of a new more inclusive kind of bottom-up history, one that focused on the daily life of the "average man." But almost as quickly, they also began to worry about the problem of fragmentation and the related decline of narrative forms of historical writing. Now, more than thirty years later, scholars of early America are finding creative ways to reinvent the very idea of synthesis, offering new narratives that draw on postmodern theories of identity and power in order to integrate disparate elements of the historical record in fresh and exciting ways.

    AB - When the "new social history" movement developed in early American studies around 1970 - with the near simultaneous publication of path-breaking work by John Demos, Philip Greven, Jr., Kenneth Lockridge, and Michael Zuckerman - critics hailed the arrival of a new more inclusive kind of bottom-up history, one that focused on the daily life of the "average man." But almost as quickly, they also began to worry about the problem of fragmentation and the related decline of narrative forms of historical writing. Now, more than thirty years later, scholars of early America are finding creative ways to reinvent the very idea of synthesis, offering new narratives that draw on postmodern theories of identity and power in order to integrate disparate elements of the historical record in fresh and exciting ways.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141764885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141764885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 37

    SP - 77-91+283

    JO - Journal of Social History

    JF - Journal of Social History

    SN - 0022-4529

    IS - 1

    ER -