What makes for a critical press? A case study of French and U.S. immigration news coverage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article measures and explains criticism in U.S. and French national newspapers during the 1990s and 2000s. Criticism is operationalized in terms of discrete critical statements directed at governmental, political party, business, civil society, and foreign/ international organizations or officials; such critical statements, which take various forms-administrative, character, truth, ideology, policy, and strategy-offer a more comprehensive measure of criticism on a day-to-day basis than the occasional in-depth investigative report. While state intervention is often argued to have a censoring effect, this study finds that the more "statist" French press presents a greater density of criticisms than the U.S. press. French newspapers that receive the highest direct subsidies are not less critical of the government or dominant party than other French (or U.S.) newspapers. French newspapers exhibit a slightly higher degree of political parallelism, but in both countries newspapers tend to aim the greatest amount of criticism toward the party in power, whether Left or Right. Relatively higher French criticism is also facilitated by a distinctive French journalistic cultural form, the "debate ensemble," that, in contrast to U.S. "dramatic narrative," organizes the news as a clash of critical opposing viewpoints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-24
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Press/Politics
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

immigration
news
criticism
coverage
newspaper
Industry
party in power
International Organizations
subsidy
civil society
ideology
narrative

Keywords

  • Comparative research
  • Democracy
  • Journalism
  • Newspapers
  • North America
  • Western Europe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Communication

Cite this

What makes for a critical press? A case study of French and U.S. immigration news coverage. / Benson, Rodney.

In: International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 3-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{448ee32fc1a548c39989c3d702297850,
title = "What makes for a critical press? A case study of French and U.S. immigration news coverage",
abstract = "This article measures and explains criticism in U.S. and French national newspapers during the 1990s and 2000s. Criticism is operationalized in terms of discrete critical statements directed at governmental, political party, business, civil society, and foreign/ international organizations or officials; such critical statements, which take various forms-administrative, character, truth, ideology, policy, and strategy-offer a more comprehensive measure of criticism on a day-to-day basis than the occasional in-depth investigative report. While state intervention is often argued to have a censoring effect, this study finds that the more {"}statist{"} French press presents a greater density of criticisms than the U.S. press. French newspapers that receive the highest direct subsidies are not less critical of the government or dominant party than other French (or U.S.) newspapers. French newspapers exhibit a slightly higher degree of political parallelism, but in both countries newspapers tend to aim the greatest amount of criticism toward the party in power, whether Left or Right. Relatively higher French criticism is also facilitated by a distinctive French journalistic cultural form, the {"}debate ensemble,{"} that, in contrast to U.S. {"}dramatic narrative,{"} organizes the news as a clash of critical opposing viewpoints.",
keywords = "Comparative research, Democracy, Journalism, Newspapers, North America, Western Europe",
author = "Rodney Benson",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1940161209349346",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "3--24",
journal = "International Journal of Press/Politics",
issn = "1940-1612",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What makes for a critical press? A case study of French and U.S. immigration news coverage

AU - Benson, Rodney

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - This article measures and explains criticism in U.S. and French national newspapers during the 1990s and 2000s. Criticism is operationalized in terms of discrete critical statements directed at governmental, political party, business, civil society, and foreign/ international organizations or officials; such critical statements, which take various forms-administrative, character, truth, ideology, policy, and strategy-offer a more comprehensive measure of criticism on a day-to-day basis than the occasional in-depth investigative report. While state intervention is often argued to have a censoring effect, this study finds that the more "statist" French press presents a greater density of criticisms than the U.S. press. French newspapers that receive the highest direct subsidies are not less critical of the government or dominant party than other French (or U.S.) newspapers. French newspapers exhibit a slightly higher degree of political parallelism, but in both countries newspapers tend to aim the greatest amount of criticism toward the party in power, whether Left or Right. Relatively higher French criticism is also facilitated by a distinctive French journalistic cultural form, the "debate ensemble," that, in contrast to U.S. "dramatic narrative," organizes the news as a clash of critical opposing viewpoints.

AB - This article measures and explains criticism in U.S. and French national newspapers during the 1990s and 2000s. Criticism is operationalized in terms of discrete critical statements directed at governmental, political party, business, civil society, and foreign/ international organizations or officials; such critical statements, which take various forms-administrative, character, truth, ideology, policy, and strategy-offer a more comprehensive measure of criticism on a day-to-day basis than the occasional in-depth investigative report. While state intervention is often argued to have a censoring effect, this study finds that the more "statist" French press presents a greater density of criticisms than the U.S. press. French newspapers that receive the highest direct subsidies are not less critical of the government or dominant party than other French (or U.S.) newspapers. French newspapers exhibit a slightly higher degree of political parallelism, but in both countries newspapers tend to aim the greatest amount of criticism toward the party in power, whether Left or Right. Relatively higher French criticism is also facilitated by a distinctive French journalistic cultural form, the "debate ensemble," that, in contrast to U.S. "dramatic narrative," organizes the news as a clash of critical opposing viewpoints.

KW - Comparative research

KW - Democracy

KW - Journalism

KW - Newspapers

KW - North America

KW - Western Europe

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73949121229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73949121229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1940161209349346

DO - 10.1177/1940161209349346

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 3

EP - 24

JO - International Journal of Press/Politics

JF - International Journal of Press/Politics

SN - 1940-1612

IS - 1

ER -