What is the concept of globalization good for? An African historian's perspective

Frederick Cooper

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    African history reveals the inadequacy of the concept of globalization. In contrasting a present of flows with a past of structures, it misreads the ways in which a 400-year-long process defined both Africa and the Atlantic-centred capitalist economy. In regard to both past and present, it draws attention to the specific mechanisms by which long-distance connections were forged and the limits of those mechanisms. Like modernization theory in the 1950s and 1960s, globalization talk is influential - and deeply misleading - for assuming coherence and direction instead of probing causes and processes. The article argues for more modest and more discerning ways of analyzing processes that cross borders but are not universal, that constitute long-distance networks and social fields but not on a planetary scale.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)189-213
    Number of pages25
    JournalAfrican Affairs
    Volume100
    Issue number399
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    globalization
    historian
    modernization
    modernization theory
    social field
    present
    history
    economy
    cause
    Africa
    border
    coherence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    What is the concept of globalization good for? An African historian's perspective. / Cooper, Frederick.

    In: African Affairs, Vol. 100, No. 399, 2001, p. 189-213.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Cooper, Frederick. / What is the concept of globalization good for? An African historian's perspective. In: African Affairs. 2001 ; Vol. 100, No. 399. pp. 189-213.
    @article{8cdbdfb7a4b041f78022a37ad94db9d3,
    title = "What is the concept of globalization good for? An African historian's perspective",
    abstract = "African history reveals the inadequacy of the concept of globalization. In contrasting a present of flows with a past of structures, it misreads the ways in which a 400-year-long process defined both Africa and the Atlantic-centred capitalist economy. In regard to both past and present, it draws attention to the specific mechanisms by which long-distance connections were forged and the limits of those mechanisms. Like modernization theory in the 1950s and 1960s, globalization talk is influential - and deeply misleading - for assuming coherence and direction instead of probing causes and processes. The article argues for more modest and more discerning ways of analyzing processes that cross borders but are not universal, that constitute long-distance networks and social fields but not on a planetary scale.",
    author = "Frederick Cooper",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1093/afraf/100.399.189",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "100",
    pages = "189--213",
    journal = "African Affairs",
    issn = "0001-9909",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "399",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What is the concept of globalization good for? An African historian's perspective

    AU - Cooper, Frederick

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - African history reveals the inadequacy of the concept of globalization. In contrasting a present of flows with a past of structures, it misreads the ways in which a 400-year-long process defined both Africa and the Atlantic-centred capitalist economy. In regard to both past and present, it draws attention to the specific mechanisms by which long-distance connections were forged and the limits of those mechanisms. Like modernization theory in the 1950s and 1960s, globalization talk is influential - and deeply misleading - for assuming coherence and direction instead of probing causes and processes. The article argues for more modest and more discerning ways of analyzing processes that cross borders but are not universal, that constitute long-distance networks and social fields but not on a planetary scale.

    AB - African history reveals the inadequacy of the concept of globalization. In contrasting a present of flows with a past of structures, it misreads the ways in which a 400-year-long process defined both Africa and the Atlantic-centred capitalist economy. In regard to both past and present, it draws attention to the specific mechanisms by which long-distance connections were forged and the limits of those mechanisms. Like modernization theory in the 1950s and 1960s, globalization talk is influential - and deeply misleading - for assuming coherence and direction instead of probing causes and processes. The article argues for more modest and more discerning ways of analyzing processes that cross borders but are not universal, that constitute long-distance networks and social fields but not on a planetary scale.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034971018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034971018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/afraf/100.399.189

    DO - 10.1093/afraf/100.399.189

    M3 - Article

    VL - 100

    SP - 189

    EP - 213

    JO - African Affairs

    JF - African Affairs

    SN - 0001-9909

    IS - 399

    ER -