What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions

David Garland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In this article Michel Foucault’s method of writing a “history of the present” is explained, together with its critical objectives and its difference from conventional historiography. Foucault’s shift from a style of historical research and analysis conceived as “archaeology” to one understood as “genealogy” is also discussed, showing how the history of the present deploys genealogical inquiry and the uncovering of hidden conflicts and contexts as a means of re-valuing the value of contemporary phenomena. The article highlights the critical observations of present-day phenomena from which a history of the present begins, paying particular attention to Foucault’s concept of “dispositif” and his method of problematization. Foucault’s analyses of Bentham’s Panopticon, of the disciplinary sources of the modern prison, and of the technology of confession are discussed by way of illustration.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)365-384
    Number of pages20
    JournalPunishment and Society
    Volume16
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 27 2014

    Fingerprint

    genealogy
    present
    history
    dispositif
    historiography
    correctional institution
    archaeology
    Values

    Keywords

    • archaeology
    • dispositif
    • Foucault
    • genealogy
    • history of the present
    • problematization

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Law

    Cite this

    What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions. / Garland, David.

    In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 16, No. 4, 27.10.2014, p. 365-384.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{9e1eddfef3a146fa9a422fdb7e524231,
    title = "What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions",
    abstract = "In this article Michel Foucault’s method of writing a “history of the present” is explained, together with its critical objectives and its difference from conventional historiography. Foucault’s shift from a style of historical research and analysis conceived as “archaeology” to one understood as “genealogy” is also discussed, showing how the history of the present deploys genealogical inquiry and the uncovering of hidden conflicts and contexts as a means of re-valuing the value of contemporary phenomena. The article highlights the critical observations of present-day phenomena from which a history of the present begins, paying particular attention to Foucault’s concept of “dispositif” and his method of problematization. Foucault’s analyses of Bentham’s Panopticon, of the disciplinary sources of the modern prison, and of the technology of confession are discussed by way of illustration.",
    keywords = "archaeology, dispositif, Foucault, genealogy, history of the present, problematization",
    author = "David Garland",
    year = "2014",
    month = "10",
    day = "27",
    doi = "10.1177/1462474514541711",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "365--384",
    journal = "Punishment and Society",
    issn = "1462-4745",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions

    AU - Garland, David

    PY - 2014/10/27

    Y1 - 2014/10/27

    N2 - In this article Michel Foucault’s method of writing a “history of the present” is explained, together with its critical objectives and its difference from conventional historiography. Foucault’s shift from a style of historical research and analysis conceived as “archaeology” to one understood as “genealogy” is also discussed, showing how the history of the present deploys genealogical inquiry and the uncovering of hidden conflicts and contexts as a means of re-valuing the value of contemporary phenomena. The article highlights the critical observations of present-day phenomena from which a history of the present begins, paying particular attention to Foucault’s concept of “dispositif” and his method of problematization. Foucault’s analyses of Bentham’s Panopticon, of the disciplinary sources of the modern prison, and of the technology of confession are discussed by way of illustration.

    AB - In this article Michel Foucault’s method of writing a “history of the present” is explained, together with its critical objectives and its difference from conventional historiography. Foucault’s shift from a style of historical research and analysis conceived as “archaeology” to one understood as “genealogy” is also discussed, showing how the history of the present deploys genealogical inquiry and the uncovering of hidden conflicts and contexts as a means of re-valuing the value of contemporary phenomena. The article highlights the critical observations of present-day phenomena from which a history of the present begins, paying particular attention to Foucault’s concept of “dispositif” and his method of problematization. Foucault’s analyses of Bentham’s Panopticon, of the disciplinary sources of the modern prison, and of the technology of confession are discussed by way of illustration.

    KW - archaeology

    KW - dispositif

    KW - Foucault

    KW - genealogy

    KW - history of the present

    KW - problematization

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908143694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908143694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/1462474514541711

    DO - 10.1177/1462474514541711

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 365

    EP - 384

    JO - Punishment and Society

    JF - Punishment and Society

    SN - 1462-4745

    IS - 4

    ER -