What infants know and what they do: Perceiving possibilities for walking through openings

John M. Franchak, Karen E. Adolph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What infants decide to do does not necessarily reflect the extent of what they know. In the current study, 17-month-olds were encouraged to walk through openings of varying width under risk of entrapment. Infants erred by squeezing into openings that were too small and became stuck, suggesting that they did not accurately perceive whether they could fit. However, a second penalty condition revealed accurate action selection when errors resulted in falling, indicating that infants are indeed perceptually sensitive to fitting through openings. Furthermore, independent measures of perception were equivalent between the two penalty conditions, suggesting that differences in action selection resulted from different penalties, not lack of perceptual sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1254-1261
Number of pages8
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Walking
penalty
infant
Accidental Falls
lack

Keywords

  • Aperture
  • Decision making
  • Gait modification
  • Motor development
  • Perception and action

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies
  • Demography

Cite this

What infants know and what they do : Perceiving possibilities for walking through openings. / Franchak, John M.; Adolph, Karen E.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 09.2012, p. 1254-1261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45bfbee72b4b47c09f2c25386b8d63fe,
title = "What infants know and what they do: Perceiving possibilities for walking through openings",
abstract = "What infants decide to do does not necessarily reflect the extent of what they know. In the current study, 17-month-olds were encouraged to walk through openings of varying width under risk of entrapment. Infants erred by squeezing into openings that were too small and became stuck, suggesting that they did not accurately perceive whether they could fit. However, a second penalty condition revealed accurate action selection when errors resulted in falling, indicating that infants are indeed perceptually sensitive to fitting through openings. Furthermore, independent measures of perception were equivalent between the two penalty conditions, suggesting that differences in action selection resulted from different penalties, not lack of perceptual sensitivity.",
keywords = "Aperture, Decision making, Gait modification, Motor development, Perception and action",
author = "Franchak, {John M.} and Adolph, {Karen E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/a0027530",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1254--1261",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What infants know and what they do

T2 - Perceiving possibilities for walking through openings

AU - Franchak, John M.

AU - Adolph, Karen E.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - What infants decide to do does not necessarily reflect the extent of what they know. In the current study, 17-month-olds were encouraged to walk through openings of varying width under risk of entrapment. Infants erred by squeezing into openings that were too small and became stuck, suggesting that they did not accurately perceive whether they could fit. However, a second penalty condition revealed accurate action selection when errors resulted in falling, indicating that infants are indeed perceptually sensitive to fitting through openings. Furthermore, independent measures of perception were equivalent between the two penalty conditions, suggesting that differences in action selection resulted from different penalties, not lack of perceptual sensitivity.

AB - What infants decide to do does not necessarily reflect the extent of what they know. In the current study, 17-month-olds were encouraged to walk through openings of varying width under risk of entrapment. Infants erred by squeezing into openings that were too small and became stuck, suggesting that they did not accurately perceive whether they could fit. However, a second penalty condition revealed accurate action selection when errors resulted in falling, indicating that infants are indeed perceptually sensitive to fitting through openings. Furthermore, independent measures of perception were equivalent between the two penalty conditions, suggesting that differences in action selection resulted from different penalties, not lack of perceptual sensitivity.

KW - Aperture

KW - Decision making

KW - Gait modification

KW - Motor development

KW - Perception and action

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871329939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871329939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0027530

DO - 10.1037/a0027530

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 1254

EP - 1261

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 5

ER -