What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events

SoYon Rim, Jochim Hansen, Yaacov Trope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When do people focus more on the causes versus the consequences of events, and how does differential focus affect downstream judgments and choices? Building on construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010), we propose a bidirectional relationship between psychological distance and causal focus, such that distance (vs. proximity) leads to a greater focus on causes (vs. consequences), and likewise, focusing on causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater estimates of psychological distance from events. This should be the case because causes are features of events that are more high-level relative to consequences (as shown in Experiments 1 and 2). We demonstrate that temporal (Experiment 3) and social (Experiment 4) distances lead to a greater tendency to focus on the causes (vs. consequences) of events and that, conversely, thinking about causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater perceptions of temporal (Experiment 5) and spatial (Experiment 6) distances from events. Additionally, we explored some downstream effects of this distance-dependent focus on causes versus consequences for predictive judgments, experiences, and behavioral choice (Experiments 7, 8, and 9). Broader implications of the results for moral decision making, power and leadership, and self-regulation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-472
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Psychology
cause
event
experiment
Decision Making
self-regulation
leadership
decision making
Self-Control
Power (Psychology)
Thinking
experience

Keywords

  • Causal inference
  • Causal thinking
  • Construal
  • Psychological distance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. / Rim, SoYon; Hansen, Jochim; Trope, Yaacov.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 104, No. 3, 2013, p. 457-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17545c9ca2634ff4bf449275756029c5,
title = "What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events",
abstract = "When do people focus more on the causes versus the consequences of events, and how does differential focus affect downstream judgments and choices? Building on construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010), we propose a bidirectional relationship between psychological distance and causal focus, such that distance (vs. proximity) leads to a greater focus on causes (vs. consequences), and likewise, focusing on causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater estimates of psychological distance from events. This should be the case because causes are features of events that are more high-level relative to consequences (as shown in Experiments 1 and 2). We demonstrate that temporal (Experiment 3) and social (Experiment 4) distances lead to a greater tendency to focus on the causes (vs. consequences) of events and that, conversely, thinking about causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater perceptions of temporal (Experiment 5) and spatial (Experiment 6) distances from events. Additionally, we explored some downstream effects of this distance-dependent focus on causes versus consequences for predictive judgments, experiences, and behavioral choice (Experiments 7, 8, and 9). Broader implications of the results for moral decision making, power and leadership, and self-regulation are discussed.",
keywords = "Causal inference, Causal thinking, Construal, Psychological distance",
author = "SoYon Rim and Jochim Hansen and Yaacov Trope",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1037/a0031024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "457--472",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events

AU - Rim, SoYon

AU - Hansen, Jochim

AU - Trope, Yaacov

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - When do people focus more on the causes versus the consequences of events, and how does differential focus affect downstream judgments and choices? Building on construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010), we propose a bidirectional relationship between psychological distance and causal focus, such that distance (vs. proximity) leads to a greater focus on causes (vs. consequences), and likewise, focusing on causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater estimates of psychological distance from events. This should be the case because causes are features of events that are more high-level relative to consequences (as shown in Experiments 1 and 2). We demonstrate that temporal (Experiment 3) and social (Experiment 4) distances lead to a greater tendency to focus on the causes (vs. consequences) of events and that, conversely, thinking about causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater perceptions of temporal (Experiment 5) and spatial (Experiment 6) distances from events. Additionally, we explored some downstream effects of this distance-dependent focus on causes versus consequences for predictive judgments, experiences, and behavioral choice (Experiments 7, 8, and 9). Broader implications of the results for moral decision making, power and leadership, and self-regulation are discussed.

AB - When do people focus more on the causes versus the consequences of events, and how does differential focus affect downstream judgments and choices? Building on construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010), we propose a bidirectional relationship between psychological distance and causal focus, such that distance (vs. proximity) leads to a greater focus on causes (vs. consequences), and likewise, focusing on causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater estimates of psychological distance from events. This should be the case because causes are features of events that are more high-level relative to consequences (as shown in Experiments 1 and 2). We demonstrate that temporal (Experiment 3) and social (Experiment 4) distances lead to a greater tendency to focus on the causes (vs. consequences) of events and that, conversely, thinking about causes (vs. consequences) leads to greater perceptions of temporal (Experiment 5) and spatial (Experiment 6) distances from events. Additionally, we explored some downstream effects of this distance-dependent focus on causes versus consequences for predictive judgments, experiences, and behavioral choice (Experiments 7, 8, and 9). Broader implications of the results for moral decision making, power and leadership, and self-regulation are discussed.

KW - Causal inference

KW - Causal thinking

KW - Construal

KW - Psychological distance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880984426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880984426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0031024

DO - 10.1037/a0031024

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 457

EP - 472

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -