Welfare reform: Recent policy and politics

Lawrence Mead

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Public policy research has not combined policy and political analysis as its pioneers imagined. Mostly, political scientists study just the policy process, abandoning prescriptions to policy specialists. A better approach is to combine policy and political analysis, using positions on issues to assess policymaking, and vice versa. This article illustrates that approach by applying it to recent welfare reform. I take raising work levels as the chief goal of reform and assess the Family Support Act (FSA) of 1988 and the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 against it. FSA was a timid compromise that achieved little while PRWORA was a conflicted measure that achieved more, but at unnecessary risk. I also ask how the tensions between best policy and politics might be resolved. This approach makes public policy research more relevant to the real stakes in policymaking. [142 words.].

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)204-237
    Number of pages34
    JournalReview of Policy Research
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Mar 2002

    Fingerprint

    welfare reform
    reform policy
    politics
    welfare
    act
    reconciliation
    public policy
    reform
    responsibility
    political scientist
    compromise
    medication
    policy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development

    Cite this

    Welfare reform : Recent policy and politics. / Mead, Lawrence.

    In: Review of Policy Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 03.2002, p. 204-237.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mead, L 2002, 'Welfare reform: Recent policy and politics', Review of Policy Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 204-237.
    Mead, Lawrence. / Welfare reform : Recent policy and politics. In: Review of Policy Research. 2002 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 204-237.
    @article{330683650f714bb29b574ad1dc2a6a3e,
    title = "Welfare reform: Recent policy and politics",
    abstract = "Public policy research has not combined policy and political analysis as its pioneers imagined. Mostly, political scientists study just the policy process, abandoning prescriptions to policy specialists. A better approach is to combine policy and political analysis, using positions on issues to assess policymaking, and vice versa. This article illustrates that approach by applying it to recent welfare reform. I take raising work levels as the chief goal of reform and assess the Family Support Act (FSA) of 1988 and the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 against it. FSA was a timid compromise that achieved little while PRWORA was a conflicted measure that achieved more, but at unnecessary risk. I also ask how the tensions between best policy and politics might be resolved. This approach makes public policy research more relevant to the real stakes in policymaking. [142 words.].",
    author = "Lawrence Mead",
    year = "2002",
    month = "3",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "204--237",
    journal = "Review of Policy Research",
    issn = "1541-132X",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Welfare reform

    T2 - Recent policy and politics

    AU - Mead, Lawrence

    PY - 2002/3

    Y1 - 2002/3

    N2 - Public policy research has not combined policy and political analysis as its pioneers imagined. Mostly, political scientists study just the policy process, abandoning prescriptions to policy specialists. A better approach is to combine policy and political analysis, using positions on issues to assess policymaking, and vice versa. This article illustrates that approach by applying it to recent welfare reform. I take raising work levels as the chief goal of reform and assess the Family Support Act (FSA) of 1988 and the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 against it. FSA was a timid compromise that achieved little while PRWORA was a conflicted measure that achieved more, but at unnecessary risk. I also ask how the tensions between best policy and politics might be resolved. This approach makes public policy research more relevant to the real stakes in policymaking. [142 words.].

    AB - Public policy research has not combined policy and political analysis as its pioneers imagined. Mostly, political scientists study just the policy process, abandoning prescriptions to policy specialists. A better approach is to combine policy and political analysis, using positions on issues to assess policymaking, and vice versa. This article illustrates that approach by applying it to recent welfare reform. I take raising work levels as the chief goal of reform and assess the Family Support Act (FSA) of 1988 and the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 against it. FSA was a timid compromise that achieved little while PRWORA was a conflicted measure that achieved more, but at unnecessary risk. I also ask how the tensions between best policy and politics might be resolved. This approach makes public policy research more relevant to the real stakes in policymaking. [142 words.].

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036522685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036522685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 19

    SP - 204

    EP - 237

    JO - Review of Policy Research

    JF - Review of Policy Research

    SN - 1541-132X

    IS - 1

    ER -