Welfare program performance

An analysis of south Carolina's family independence program

Caroline Ratcliffe, Demetra Smith Nightingale, Patrick Sharkey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Public agencies are increasingly expected to track their performance according to established criteria - to be held accountable for the expenditure of public funds and show that funds are being used to achieve intended outcomes. This analysis of South Carolina's Family Independence welfare program examines counties' performance on five employment-related outcomes: employment rate, employment entry rate, employment retention rate, earnings gain rate, and earned income closure rate. Counties' performance is statistically analyzed, adjusting for variation in external factors (e.g., labor market conditions and caseload characteristics) that influence program performance but that are outside the control of county program staff. This analysis shows that external factors influence employment-related performance, suggesting that states may want to vary counties' goals based on external factors, rather than expecting all counties to meet the same performance level. This analysis provides an example of how agencies can apply statistical analysis to measure, track, and analyze program performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-90
Number of pages26
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

welfare
performance
earned income
Welfare programs
statistical analysis
expenditures
labor market
staff
External factors
Employment rate

Keywords

  • Earnings
  • Employment
  • Performance
  • Welfare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Welfare program performance : An analysis of south Carolina's family independence program. / Ratcliffe, Caroline; Nightingale, Demetra Smith; Sharkey, Patrick.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 37, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 65-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{463e1a84f3b64710b59eb6453561f1ec,
title = "Welfare program performance: An analysis of south Carolina's family independence program",
abstract = "Public agencies are increasingly expected to track their performance according to established criteria - to be held accountable for the expenditure of public funds and show that funds are being used to achieve intended outcomes. This analysis of South Carolina's Family Independence welfare program examines counties' performance on five employment-related outcomes: employment rate, employment entry rate, employment retention rate, earnings gain rate, and earned income closure rate. Counties' performance is statistically analyzed, adjusting for variation in external factors (e.g., labor market conditions and caseload characteristics) that influence program performance but that are outside the control of county program staff. This analysis shows that external factors influence employment-related performance, suggesting that states may want to vary counties' goals based on external factors, rather than expecting all counties to meet the same performance level. This analysis provides an example of how agencies can apply statistical analysis to measure, track, and analyze program performance.",
keywords = "Earnings, Employment, Performance, Welfare",
author = "Caroline Ratcliffe and Nightingale, {Demetra Smith} and Patrick Sharkey",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0275074006288307",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "65--90",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Welfare program performance

T2 - An analysis of south Carolina's family independence program

AU - Ratcliffe, Caroline

AU - Nightingale, Demetra Smith

AU - Sharkey, Patrick

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Public agencies are increasingly expected to track their performance according to established criteria - to be held accountable for the expenditure of public funds and show that funds are being used to achieve intended outcomes. This analysis of South Carolina's Family Independence welfare program examines counties' performance on five employment-related outcomes: employment rate, employment entry rate, employment retention rate, earnings gain rate, and earned income closure rate. Counties' performance is statistically analyzed, adjusting for variation in external factors (e.g., labor market conditions and caseload characteristics) that influence program performance but that are outside the control of county program staff. This analysis shows that external factors influence employment-related performance, suggesting that states may want to vary counties' goals based on external factors, rather than expecting all counties to meet the same performance level. This analysis provides an example of how agencies can apply statistical analysis to measure, track, and analyze program performance.

AB - Public agencies are increasingly expected to track their performance according to established criteria - to be held accountable for the expenditure of public funds and show that funds are being used to achieve intended outcomes. This analysis of South Carolina's Family Independence welfare program examines counties' performance on five employment-related outcomes: employment rate, employment entry rate, employment retention rate, earnings gain rate, and earned income closure rate. Counties' performance is statistically analyzed, adjusting for variation in external factors (e.g., labor market conditions and caseload characteristics) that influence program performance but that are outside the control of county program staff. This analysis shows that external factors influence employment-related performance, suggesting that states may want to vary counties' goals based on external factors, rather than expecting all counties to meet the same performance level. This analysis provides an example of how agencies can apply statistical analysis to measure, track, and analyze program performance.

KW - Earnings

KW - Employment

KW - Performance

KW - Welfare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846688974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846688974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074006288307

DO - 10.1177/0275074006288307

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 65

EP - 90

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 1

ER -