Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We test hypotheses concerning human cue combination in a slant estimation task. Observers repeatedly adjusted the slant of a plane to 75°. Feedback was provided after each setting and the observers trained extensively until their setting error stabilized. The slant of the plane was defined by either linear perspective alone (a grid of lines) or texture gradient alone (diamond-shaped texture elements) or the two cues together. We chose a High and Low variance version of each cue type and measured setting variability in four single-cue conditions (Low, High for each cue) and in the four possible combined-cue conditions (Low-Low, Low-High, etc.). We compared performance in the combined-cue conditions to predictions based on single-cue performance. The results were consistent with a linear combination of estimates from cues. Six out of eight observers did better with combined cues than with either cue alone. For three observers, performance was consistent with optimal combination of uncorrelated cues. Three other observers' results were also consistent with optimal combination, but with the assumption that internal cue estimates were correlated. The remaining two observers were consistent with sub-optimal cue combination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2451-2468
Number of pages18
JournalVision Research
Volume43
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Fingerprint

Cues
Diamond

Keywords

  • Correlated cues
  • Cue combination
  • Pictorial depth cues
  • Slant perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. / Oruç, Ipek; Maloney, Laurence T.; Landy, Michael S.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 43, No. 23, 10.2003, p. 2451-2468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5806f3e9f7a74f12b90d6afa9f90ee3e,
title = "Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error",
abstract = "We test hypotheses concerning human cue combination in a slant estimation task. Observers repeatedly adjusted the slant of a plane to 75°. Feedback was provided after each setting and the observers trained extensively until their setting error stabilized. The slant of the plane was defined by either linear perspective alone (a grid of lines) or texture gradient alone (diamond-shaped texture elements) or the two cues together. We chose a High and Low variance version of each cue type and measured setting variability in four single-cue conditions (Low, High for each cue) and in the four possible combined-cue conditions (Low-Low, Low-High, etc.). We compared performance in the combined-cue conditions to predictions based on single-cue performance. The results were consistent with a linear combination of estimates from cues. Six out of eight observers did better with combined cues than with either cue alone. For three observers, performance was consistent with optimal combination of uncorrelated cues. Three other observers' results were also consistent with optimal combination, but with the assumption that internal cue estimates were correlated. The remaining two observers were consistent with sub-optimal cue combination.",
keywords = "Correlated cues, Cue combination, Pictorial depth cues, Slant perception",
author = "Ipek Oru{\cc} and Maloney, {Laurence T.} and Landy, {Michael S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00435-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "2451--2468",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error

AU - Oruç, Ipek

AU - Maloney, Laurence T.

AU - Landy, Michael S.

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - We test hypotheses concerning human cue combination in a slant estimation task. Observers repeatedly adjusted the slant of a plane to 75°. Feedback was provided after each setting and the observers trained extensively until their setting error stabilized. The slant of the plane was defined by either linear perspective alone (a grid of lines) or texture gradient alone (diamond-shaped texture elements) or the two cues together. We chose a High and Low variance version of each cue type and measured setting variability in four single-cue conditions (Low, High for each cue) and in the four possible combined-cue conditions (Low-Low, Low-High, etc.). We compared performance in the combined-cue conditions to predictions based on single-cue performance. The results were consistent with a linear combination of estimates from cues. Six out of eight observers did better with combined cues than with either cue alone. For three observers, performance was consistent with optimal combination of uncorrelated cues. Three other observers' results were also consistent with optimal combination, but with the assumption that internal cue estimates were correlated. The remaining two observers were consistent with sub-optimal cue combination.

AB - We test hypotheses concerning human cue combination in a slant estimation task. Observers repeatedly adjusted the slant of a plane to 75°. Feedback was provided after each setting and the observers trained extensively until their setting error stabilized. The slant of the plane was defined by either linear perspective alone (a grid of lines) or texture gradient alone (diamond-shaped texture elements) or the two cues together. We chose a High and Low variance version of each cue type and measured setting variability in four single-cue conditions (Low, High for each cue) and in the four possible combined-cue conditions (Low-Low, Low-High, etc.). We compared performance in the combined-cue conditions to predictions based on single-cue performance. The results were consistent with a linear combination of estimates from cues. Six out of eight observers did better with combined cues than with either cue alone. For three observers, performance was consistent with optimal combination of uncorrelated cues. Three other observers' results were also consistent with optimal combination, but with the assumption that internal cue estimates were correlated. The remaining two observers were consistent with sub-optimal cue combination.

KW - Correlated cues

KW - Cue combination

KW - Pictorial depth cues

KW - Slant perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0642343029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0642343029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00435-8

DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00435-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 12972395

AN - SCOPUS:0642343029

VL - 43

SP - 2451

EP - 2468

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 23

ER -