Wealth Inequality and Democracy

Kenneth Scheve, David Stasavage

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

What do we know about wealth inequality and democracy? Our review shows that the simple conjectures that democracy produces wealth equality and that wealth inequality leads to democratic failure are not supported by the evidence. Why are democracy and high levels of wealth inequality sustainable together? Three key features of democratic politics can make this outcome possible. When societies are divided along cleavages other than wealth, this can inhibit the adoption of wealth-equalizing policies. Likewise, voter preferences for the redistribution of wealth depend on the beliefs they form about the fairness of these measures, and some voters without wealth may feel that redistribution is unfair. Finally, wealth-equalizing policies may be absent if the democratic process is captured by the rich; however, the evidence explaining when, where, and why capture accounts for variation in wealth inequality is less convincing than is often claimed. This phenomenon is a useful avenue for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-468
Number of pages18
JournalAnnual Review of Political Science
Volume20
DOIs
StatePublished - May 11 2017

Fingerprint

democracy
redistribution
fairness
evidence
equality
voter
politics
society

Keywords

  • Inequality
  • Redistribution
  • Taxation
  • Wealth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Wealth Inequality and Democracy. / Scheve, Kenneth; Stasavage, David.

In: Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 20, 11.05.2017, p. 451-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{ca71f13da2444e5bab0c6664b27c7ec0,
title = "Wealth Inequality and Democracy",
abstract = "What do we know about wealth inequality and democracy? Our review shows that the simple conjectures that democracy produces wealth equality and that wealth inequality leads to democratic failure are not supported by the evidence. Why are democracy and high levels of wealth inequality sustainable together? Three key features of democratic politics can make this outcome possible. When societies are divided along cleavages other than wealth, this can inhibit the adoption of wealth-equalizing policies. Likewise, voter preferences for the redistribution of wealth depend on the beliefs they form about the fairness of these measures, and some voters without wealth may feel that redistribution is unfair. Finally, wealth-equalizing policies may be absent if the democratic process is captured by the rich; however, the evidence explaining when, where, and why capture accounts for variation in wealth inequality is less convincing than is often claimed. This phenomenon is a useful avenue for future research.",
keywords = "Inequality, Redistribution, Taxation, Wealth",
author = "Kenneth Scheve and David Stasavage",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "451--468",
journal = "Annual Review of Political Science",
issn = "1094-2939",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wealth Inequality and Democracy

AU - Scheve, Kenneth

AU - Stasavage, David

PY - 2017/5/11

Y1 - 2017/5/11

N2 - What do we know about wealth inequality and democracy? Our review shows that the simple conjectures that democracy produces wealth equality and that wealth inequality leads to democratic failure are not supported by the evidence. Why are democracy and high levels of wealth inequality sustainable together? Three key features of democratic politics can make this outcome possible. When societies are divided along cleavages other than wealth, this can inhibit the adoption of wealth-equalizing policies. Likewise, voter preferences for the redistribution of wealth depend on the beliefs they form about the fairness of these measures, and some voters without wealth may feel that redistribution is unfair. Finally, wealth-equalizing policies may be absent if the democratic process is captured by the rich; however, the evidence explaining when, where, and why capture accounts for variation in wealth inequality is less convincing than is often claimed. This phenomenon is a useful avenue for future research.

AB - What do we know about wealth inequality and democracy? Our review shows that the simple conjectures that democracy produces wealth equality and that wealth inequality leads to democratic failure are not supported by the evidence. Why are democracy and high levels of wealth inequality sustainable together? Three key features of democratic politics can make this outcome possible. When societies are divided along cleavages other than wealth, this can inhibit the adoption of wealth-equalizing policies. Likewise, voter preferences for the redistribution of wealth depend on the beliefs they form about the fairness of these measures, and some voters without wealth may feel that redistribution is unfair. Finally, wealth-equalizing policies may be absent if the democratic process is captured by the rich; however, the evidence explaining when, where, and why capture accounts for variation in wealth inequality is less convincing than is often claimed. This phenomenon is a useful avenue for future research.

KW - Inequality

KW - Redistribution

KW - Taxation

KW - Wealth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019470678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019470678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840

DO - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85019470678

VL - 20

SP - 451

EP - 468

JO - Annual Review of Political Science

JF - Annual Review of Political Science

SN - 1094-2939

ER -