Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking

Anna Szabolcsi, Frans Zwarts

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    Abstract

    Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a "semantic relativized minimality effect". © 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationWays of Scope Taking
    Editors Szabolcsi, Kluwer
    Place of PublicationColumbus, Ohio
    PublisherOSU WPL
    Pages217-263
    Volume40
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1997

    Fingerprint

    semantics
    interaction

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Szabolcsi, A., & Zwarts, F. (1997). Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. In Szabolcsi, & Kluwer (Eds.), Ways of Scope Taking (Vol. 40, pp. 217-263). Columbus, Ohio: OSU WPL. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263545

    Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. / Szabolcsi, Anna; Zwarts, Frans.

    Ways of Scope Taking. ed. / Szabolcsi; Kluwer. Vol. 40 Columbus, Ohio : OSU WPL, 1997. p. 217-263.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    Szabolcsi, A & Zwarts, F 1997, Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. in Szabolcsi & Kluwer (eds), Ways of Scope Taking. vol. 40, OSU WPL, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 217-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263545
    Szabolcsi A, Zwarts F. Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. In Szabolcsi, Kluwer, editors, Ways of Scope Taking. Vol. 40. Columbus, Ohio: OSU WPL. 1997. p. 217-263 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263545
    Szabolcsi, Anna ; Zwarts, Frans. / Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. Ways of Scope Taking. editor / Szabolcsi ; Kluwer. Vol. 40 Columbus, Ohio : OSU WPL, 1997. pp. 217-263
    @inbook{8422272f48ae4a3f95855e569f1ae3c8,
    title = "Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking",
    abstract = "Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a {"}semantic relativized minimality effect{"}. {\circledC} 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers.",
    author = "Anna Szabolcsi and Frans Zwarts",
    year = "1997",
    doi = "10.1007/BF00263545",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "40",
    pages = "217--263",
    editor = "Szabolcsi and Kluwer",
    booktitle = "Ways of Scope Taking",
    publisher = "OSU WPL",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking

    AU - Szabolcsi, Anna

    AU - Zwarts, Frans

    PY - 1997

    Y1 - 1997

    N2 - Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a "semantic relativized minimality effect". © 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    AB - Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a "semantic relativized minimality effect". © 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011617406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011617406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/BF00263545

    DO - 10.1007/BF00263545

    M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

    VL - 40

    SP - 217

    EP - 263

    BT - Ways of Scope Taking

    A2 - Szabolcsi, null

    A2 - Kluwer, null

    PB - OSU WPL

    CY - Columbus, Ohio

    ER -