Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking

Anna Szabolcsi, Frans Zwarts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a "semantic relativized minimality effect".

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)235-284
    Number of pages50
    JournalNatural Language Semantics
    Volume1
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1993

    Fingerprint

    semantics
    interaction
    Algebraic Semantics
    Wh-phrases
    Relativized Minimality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. / Szabolcsi, Anna; Zwarts, Frans.

    In: Natural Language Semantics, Vol. 1, No. 3, 01.1993, p. 235-284.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Szabolcsi, Anna ; Zwarts, Frans. / Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. In: Natural Language Semantics. 1993 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 235-284.
    @article{241d150d2f084415836fd548e2745850,
    title = "Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking",
    abstract = "Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a {"}semantic relativized minimality effect{"}.",
    author = "Anna Szabolcsi and Frans Zwarts",
    year = "1993",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/BF00263545",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "235--284",
    journal = "Natural Language Semantics",
    issn = "0925-854X",
    publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking

    AU - Szabolcsi, Anna

    AU - Zwarts, Frans

    PY - 1993/1

    Y1 - 1993/1

    N2 - Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a "semantic relativized minimality effect".

    AB - Modifying the descriptive and theoretical generalizations of Relativized Minimality, we argue that a significant subset of weak island violations arise when an extracted phrase should scope over some intervener but is unable to. Harmless interveners seem harmless because they can support an alternative reading. This paper focuses on why certain wh-phrases are poor wide scope takers, and offers an algebraic perspective on scope interaction. Each scopal element SE is associated with certain operations (e.g., not with complements). When a wh-phrase scopes over some SE, the operations associated with that SE are performed in its denotation domain. The requisite operations may or may not be available in a domain, however. We present an empirical analysis of a variety of wh-phrases. It is argued that the wh-phrases that escape all weak islands (i.e., can scope over any intervener) are those that range over individuals, the reason being that all Boolean operations are defined for their domain. Collectives, manners, amounts, numbers, etc. all denote in domains with fewer operations and are thus selectively sensitive to scopal interveners-a "semantic relativized minimality effect".

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011617406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011617406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/BF00263545

    DO - 10.1007/BF00263545

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 235

    EP - 284

    JO - Natural Language Semantics

    JF - Natural Language Semantics

    SN - 0925-854X

    IS - 3

    ER -