Wages of nurturant and reproductive care workers: Individual and job characteristics, occupational closure, and wage-equalizing institutions

Michelle J. Budig, Melissa J. Hodges, Paula England

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Despite the work's social importance, nurturant and reproductive care workers earn less than others with comparable human capital and work demands. We explore three broad questions related to pay for care work. First, we examine nurturant and reproductive care penalties together to investigate what mechanisms produce the lower wages for these workers. Second, we examine how occupational closure through education credentials and licensing requirements creates varying returns to care work. Finally, we explore the roles of wage equalizing institutions-labor unions and government sector care provision-in reducing wage disparities associated with care work. Using the 1979-2012 waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) and fixed-effects regression models, we find that selection on stable factors and human capital differences explain much of the lower wages for reproductive workers, but none of the low wages of nurturant workers. However, compared to non-care workers, college-educated nurturant care workers receive lower returns to work experience, suggesting limitations in how much learning can increase efficiency in care work, given the labor intensive, face-to-face nature of much of it. Occupational closure matters: Care jobs with the highest educational and licensing requirements pay a wage bonus, while less closed care occupations incur a penalty. Wage equalizing institutions have both floor and ceiling effects on care worker wages that mitigate care penalties for selected workers: women reproductive workers and women in low-education/ high-licensing occupations. More consistently, ceiling effects of these institutions lower the wages of otherwise higher paid care workers: nurturant and high-education/high licensing occupations.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)294-319
    Number of pages26
    JournalSocial Problems
    Volume66
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    job characteristics
    wage
    worker
    low wage
    penalty
    occupation
    human capital
    labor
    education

    Keywords

    • Care work
    • Gender
    • Human capital
    • Occupational closure
    • Wage penalty

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Wages of nurturant and reproductive care workers : Individual and job characteristics, occupational closure, and wage-equalizing institutions. / Budig, Michelle J.; Hodges, Melissa J.; England, Paula.

    In: Social Problems, Vol. 66, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 294-319.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{620a764efb574d1da5418aa60bda6b15,
    title = "Wages of nurturant and reproductive care workers: Individual and job characteristics, occupational closure, and wage-equalizing institutions",
    abstract = "Despite the work's social importance, nurturant and reproductive care workers earn less than others with comparable human capital and work demands. We explore three broad questions related to pay for care work. First, we examine nurturant and reproductive care penalties together to investigate what mechanisms produce the lower wages for these workers. Second, we examine how occupational closure through education credentials and licensing requirements creates varying returns to care work. Finally, we explore the roles of wage equalizing institutions-labor unions and government sector care provision-in reducing wage disparities associated with care work. Using the 1979-2012 waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) and fixed-effects regression models, we find that selection on stable factors and human capital differences explain much of the lower wages for reproductive workers, but none of the low wages of nurturant workers. However, compared to non-care workers, college-educated nurturant care workers receive lower returns to work experience, suggesting limitations in how much learning can increase efficiency in care work, given the labor intensive, face-to-face nature of much of it. Occupational closure matters: Care jobs with the highest educational and licensing requirements pay a wage bonus, while less closed care occupations incur a penalty. Wage equalizing institutions have both floor and ceiling effects on care worker wages that mitigate care penalties for selected workers: women reproductive workers and women in low-education/ high-licensing occupations. More consistently, ceiling effects of these institutions lower the wages of otherwise higher paid care workers: nurturant and high-education/high licensing occupations.",
    keywords = "Care work, Gender, Human capital, Occupational closure, Wage penalty",
    author = "Budig, {Michelle J.} and Hodges, {Melissa J.} and Paula England",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/socpro/spy007",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "66",
    pages = "294--319",
    journal = "Social Problems",
    issn = "0037-7791",
    publisher = "University of California Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Wages of nurturant and reproductive care workers

    T2 - Individual and job characteristics, occupational closure, and wage-equalizing institutions

    AU - Budig, Michelle J.

    AU - Hodges, Melissa J.

    AU - England, Paula

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - Despite the work's social importance, nurturant and reproductive care workers earn less than others with comparable human capital and work demands. We explore three broad questions related to pay for care work. First, we examine nurturant and reproductive care penalties together to investigate what mechanisms produce the lower wages for these workers. Second, we examine how occupational closure through education credentials and licensing requirements creates varying returns to care work. Finally, we explore the roles of wage equalizing institutions-labor unions and government sector care provision-in reducing wage disparities associated with care work. Using the 1979-2012 waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) and fixed-effects regression models, we find that selection on stable factors and human capital differences explain much of the lower wages for reproductive workers, but none of the low wages of nurturant workers. However, compared to non-care workers, college-educated nurturant care workers receive lower returns to work experience, suggesting limitations in how much learning can increase efficiency in care work, given the labor intensive, face-to-face nature of much of it. Occupational closure matters: Care jobs with the highest educational and licensing requirements pay a wage bonus, while less closed care occupations incur a penalty. Wage equalizing institutions have both floor and ceiling effects on care worker wages that mitigate care penalties for selected workers: women reproductive workers and women in low-education/ high-licensing occupations. More consistently, ceiling effects of these institutions lower the wages of otherwise higher paid care workers: nurturant and high-education/high licensing occupations.

    AB - Despite the work's social importance, nurturant and reproductive care workers earn less than others with comparable human capital and work demands. We explore three broad questions related to pay for care work. First, we examine nurturant and reproductive care penalties together to investigate what mechanisms produce the lower wages for these workers. Second, we examine how occupational closure through education credentials and licensing requirements creates varying returns to care work. Finally, we explore the roles of wage equalizing institutions-labor unions and government sector care provision-in reducing wage disparities associated with care work. Using the 1979-2012 waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) and fixed-effects regression models, we find that selection on stable factors and human capital differences explain much of the lower wages for reproductive workers, but none of the low wages of nurturant workers. However, compared to non-care workers, college-educated nurturant care workers receive lower returns to work experience, suggesting limitations in how much learning can increase efficiency in care work, given the labor intensive, face-to-face nature of much of it. Occupational closure matters: Care jobs with the highest educational and licensing requirements pay a wage bonus, while less closed care occupations incur a penalty. Wage equalizing institutions have both floor and ceiling effects on care worker wages that mitigate care penalties for selected workers: women reproductive workers and women in low-education/ high-licensing occupations. More consistently, ceiling effects of these institutions lower the wages of otherwise higher paid care workers: nurturant and high-education/high licensing occupations.

    KW - Care work

    KW - Gender

    KW - Human capital

    KW - Occupational closure

    KW - Wage penalty

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071907847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071907847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/socpro/spy007

    DO - 10.1093/socpro/spy007

    M3 - Article

    VL - 66

    SP - 294

    EP - 319

    JO - Social Problems

    JF - Social Problems

    SN - 0037-7791

    IS - 2

    ER -