vP-fronting with and without remnant movement

Gary Thoms, GEORGE WALKDEN

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In this paper, we consider two kinds of vP-fronting constructions in English and argue that they receive quite different analyses. First, we show that English vP-preposing does not have the properties that would be expected of a movement-derived dependency. Evidence for this conclusion is adduced from the licensing conditions on its occurrence, from the availability of morphological mismatches, and from reconstruction facts. By contrast, we show that English participle preposing is a well-behaved case of vP-movement, contrasting with vP-preposing with respect to reconstruction properties in particular. We propose that the differences between the two constructions follow from the interaction of two constraints: the excluded middle constraint (EMC), which rules out derivations involving spellout of linearly intermediate copies only, and the N-only constraint, which restricts movement to occurring where the trace position would license a nominal. The EMC rules out deriving vP-fronting by true movement and instead necessitates a base-generation analysis, while the N-only constraint ensures that participle preposing is only possible in limited circumstances.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-54
    Number of pages54
    JournalJournal of Linguistics
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Feb 26 2018

    Fingerprint

    reconstruction
    mismatch
    license
    interaction
    evidence
    Excluded Middle
    Participle
    Intermediate
    Mismatch
    Interaction
    Licensing

    Keywords

    • ellipsis
    • linearization
    • reconstruction
    • remnant movement
    • vP-fronting

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Philosophy
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    vP-fronting with and without remnant movement. / Thoms, Gary; WALKDEN, GEORGE.

    In: Journal of Linguistics, 26.02.2018, p. 1-54.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Thoms, Gary ; WALKDEN, GEORGE. / vP-fronting with and without remnant movement. In: Journal of Linguistics. 2018 ; pp. 1-54.
    @article{2524bbd5f4974fd3950ccc09db759bb7,
    title = "vP-fronting with and without remnant movement",
    abstract = "In this paper, we consider two kinds of vP-fronting constructions in English and argue that they receive quite different analyses. First, we show that English vP-preposing does not have the properties that would be expected of a movement-derived dependency. Evidence for this conclusion is adduced from the licensing conditions on its occurrence, from the availability of morphological mismatches, and from reconstruction facts. By contrast, we show that English participle preposing is a well-behaved case of vP-movement, contrasting with vP-preposing with respect to reconstruction properties in particular. We propose that the differences between the two constructions follow from the interaction of two constraints: the excluded middle constraint (EMC), which rules out derivations involving spellout of linearly intermediate copies only, and the N-only constraint, which restricts movement to occurring where the trace position would license a nominal. The EMC rules out deriving vP-fronting by true movement and instead necessitates a base-generation analysis, while the N-only constraint ensures that participle preposing is only possible in limited circumstances.",
    keywords = "ellipsis, linearization, reconstruction, remnant movement, vP-fronting",
    author = "Gary Thoms and GEORGE WALKDEN",
    year = "2018",
    month = "2",
    day = "26",
    doi = "10.1017/S002222671800004X",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "1--54",
    journal = "Journal of Linguistics",
    issn = "0022-2267",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - vP-fronting with and without remnant movement

    AU - Thoms, Gary

    AU - WALKDEN, GEORGE

    PY - 2018/2/26

    Y1 - 2018/2/26

    N2 - In this paper, we consider two kinds of vP-fronting constructions in English and argue that they receive quite different analyses. First, we show that English vP-preposing does not have the properties that would be expected of a movement-derived dependency. Evidence for this conclusion is adduced from the licensing conditions on its occurrence, from the availability of morphological mismatches, and from reconstruction facts. By contrast, we show that English participle preposing is a well-behaved case of vP-movement, contrasting with vP-preposing with respect to reconstruction properties in particular. We propose that the differences between the two constructions follow from the interaction of two constraints: the excluded middle constraint (EMC), which rules out derivations involving spellout of linearly intermediate copies only, and the N-only constraint, which restricts movement to occurring where the trace position would license a nominal. The EMC rules out deriving vP-fronting by true movement and instead necessitates a base-generation analysis, while the N-only constraint ensures that participle preposing is only possible in limited circumstances.

    AB - In this paper, we consider two kinds of vP-fronting constructions in English and argue that they receive quite different analyses. First, we show that English vP-preposing does not have the properties that would be expected of a movement-derived dependency. Evidence for this conclusion is adduced from the licensing conditions on its occurrence, from the availability of morphological mismatches, and from reconstruction facts. By contrast, we show that English participle preposing is a well-behaved case of vP-movement, contrasting with vP-preposing with respect to reconstruction properties in particular. We propose that the differences between the two constructions follow from the interaction of two constraints: the excluded middle constraint (EMC), which rules out derivations involving spellout of linearly intermediate copies only, and the N-only constraint, which restricts movement to occurring where the trace position would license a nominal. The EMC rules out deriving vP-fronting by true movement and instead necessitates a base-generation analysis, while the N-only constraint ensures that participle preposing is only possible in limited circumstances.

    KW - ellipsis

    KW - linearization

    KW - reconstruction

    KW - remnant movement

    KW - vP-fronting

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042549445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042549445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S002222671800004X

    DO - 10.1017/S002222671800004X

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85042549445

    SP - 1

    EP - 54

    JO - Journal of Linguistics

    JF - Journal of Linguistics

    SN - 0022-2267

    ER -