Voting the general will

Rousseau on decision rules

Melissa Schwartzberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Scholars exploring the logic of Rousseau's voting rules have typically turned to the connection between Rousseau and the Marquis de Condorcet. Though Condorcet could not have had a direct influence on Rousseau's arguments about the choice of decision rules in Social Contract, the possibility of a connection has encouraged the view that Rousseau's selection of voting rules was based on epistemic reasons. By turning to alternative sources of influence on Rousseau - the work of Hugo Grotius and particularly that of Samuel Pufendorf - a moral, and not purely epistemic, logic of rules governing collective decision making emerges. For Rousseau, as for Pufendorf, the proper choice of voting rule can elicit the appropriate attitude of an individual with respect to the decision of the whole, and can support the morally significant activity of acknowledging error upon discovering that one has voted against the general will.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)403-423
    Number of pages21
    JournalPolitical Theory
    Volume36
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2008

    Fingerprint

    voting
    collective decision
    decision making
    Voting
    General Will
    Samuel Von Pufendorf
    Decision Making
    Logic
    Social Contract
    Epistemic Logic
    Hugo Grotius
    Condorcet

    Keywords

    • Condorcet
    • General will
    • Majority rule
    • Pufendorf
    • Rousseau

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Voting the general will : Rousseau on decision rules. / Schwartzberg, Melissa.

    In: Political Theory, Vol. 36, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 403-423.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Schwartzberg, Melissa. / Voting the general will : Rousseau on decision rules. In: Political Theory. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 403-423.
    @article{a393398261244cf5a63b5ebed5f93e95,
    title = "Voting the general will: Rousseau on decision rules",
    abstract = "Scholars exploring the logic of Rousseau's voting rules have typically turned to the connection between Rousseau and the Marquis de Condorcet. Though Condorcet could not have had a direct influence on Rousseau's arguments about the choice of decision rules in Social Contract, the possibility of a connection has encouraged the view that Rousseau's selection of voting rules was based on epistemic reasons. By turning to alternative sources of influence on Rousseau - the work of Hugo Grotius and particularly that of Samuel Pufendorf - a moral, and not purely epistemic, logic of rules governing collective decision making emerges. For Rousseau, as for Pufendorf, the proper choice of voting rule can elicit the appropriate attitude of an individual with respect to the decision of the whole, and can support the morally significant activity of acknowledging error upon discovering that one has voted against the general will.",
    keywords = "Condorcet, General will, Majority rule, Pufendorf, Rousseau",
    author = "Melissa Schwartzberg",
    year = "2008",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1177/0090591708315145",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "403--423",
    journal = "Political Theory",
    issn = "0090-5917",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Voting the general will

    T2 - Rousseau on decision rules

    AU - Schwartzberg, Melissa

    PY - 2008/6

    Y1 - 2008/6

    N2 - Scholars exploring the logic of Rousseau's voting rules have typically turned to the connection between Rousseau and the Marquis de Condorcet. Though Condorcet could not have had a direct influence on Rousseau's arguments about the choice of decision rules in Social Contract, the possibility of a connection has encouraged the view that Rousseau's selection of voting rules was based on epistemic reasons. By turning to alternative sources of influence on Rousseau - the work of Hugo Grotius and particularly that of Samuel Pufendorf - a moral, and not purely epistemic, logic of rules governing collective decision making emerges. For Rousseau, as for Pufendorf, the proper choice of voting rule can elicit the appropriate attitude of an individual with respect to the decision of the whole, and can support the morally significant activity of acknowledging error upon discovering that one has voted against the general will.

    AB - Scholars exploring the logic of Rousseau's voting rules have typically turned to the connection between Rousseau and the Marquis de Condorcet. Though Condorcet could not have had a direct influence on Rousseau's arguments about the choice of decision rules in Social Contract, the possibility of a connection has encouraged the view that Rousseau's selection of voting rules was based on epistemic reasons. By turning to alternative sources of influence on Rousseau - the work of Hugo Grotius and particularly that of Samuel Pufendorf - a moral, and not purely epistemic, logic of rules governing collective decision making emerges. For Rousseau, as for Pufendorf, the proper choice of voting rule can elicit the appropriate attitude of an individual with respect to the decision of the whole, and can support the morally significant activity of acknowledging error upon discovering that one has voted against the general will.

    KW - Condorcet

    KW - General will

    KW - Majority rule

    KW - Pufendorf

    KW - Rousseau

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43749108337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43749108337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0090591708315145

    DO - 10.1177/0090591708315145

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 403

    EP - 423

    JO - Political Theory

    JF - Political Theory

    SN - 0090-5917

    IS - 3

    ER -