Voice-quality abnormalities as a sign of dysphagia

Validation against acoustic and videofluoroscopic data

Ashley Waito, Gemma L. Bailey, Sonja Molfenter, Dana C. Zoratto, Catriona M. Steele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this study we explored the validity of clinician judgments of voice abnormalities as indicators of penetration-aspiration or other swallowing abnormalities. Voice samples were collected using a high-quality microphone from 40 adults during videofluoroscopy (VFSS), at baseline and following each of four thin liquid swallows. Blinded speech-language pathologists (SLPs) rated the audio recordings for voice quality using the GRBAS scale and the VFSS recordings for abnormal swallow onset, penetration-aspiration, airway closure, and pharyngeal residues. Acoustic measures of % jitter, % shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio were calculated using two /a/ vowel segments spliced from each voice recording. Preswallow to postswallow measures of voice-quality change were derived and the data were compared to determine the correspondence between perceived voice abnormalities, acoustic voice parameters, and radiographically confirmed swallowing abnormalities. The sensitivity of perceived postswallow changes in voice quality to dysphagia and penetration-aspiration was poor, ranging from 8 to 29%. Specificity was stronger for both penetration-aspiration (75-94%) and dysphagia (59-86%). Acoustic measures of voice quality had moderate sensitivity and specificity for both dysphagia and penetration-aspiration. Overall, perceptual judgments of postswallow wet voice showed the strongest potential for detecting penetration-aspiration (relative risk = 3.24). We conclude that a clear postswallow voice quality provides reasonable evidence that penetration- aspiration and dysphagia are absent. However, observations of abnormal postswallow voice quality can be misleading and are not a valid indication that penetrationaspiration or dysphagia exists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-134
Number of pages10
JournalDysphagia
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Voice Quality
Deglutition Disorders
Acoustics
Deglutition
Swallows
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Aspirations (Psychology)
Language
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Deglutition
  • Deglutition disorders
  • Dysphagia
  • Screening
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Swallowing
  • Videofluoroscopy
  • Voice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Voice-quality abnormalities as a sign of dysphagia : Validation against acoustic and videofluoroscopic data. / Waito, Ashley; Bailey, Gemma L.; Molfenter, Sonja; Zoratto, Dana C.; Steele, Catriona M.

In: Dysphagia, Vol. 26, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 125-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waito, Ashley ; Bailey, Gemma L. ; Molfenter, Sonja ; Zoratto, Dana C. ; Steele, Catriona M. / Voice-quality abnormalities as a sign of dysphagia : Validation against acoustic and videofluoroscopic data. In: Dysphagia. 2011 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 125-134.
@article{12322856d47741d6a03de5a139f02abb,
title = "Voice-quality abnormalities as a sign of dysphagia: Validation against acoustic and videofluoroscopic data",
abstract = "In this study we explored the validity of clinician judgments of voice abnormalities as indicators of penetration-aspiration or other swallowing abnormalities. Voice samples were collected using a high-quality microphone from 40 adults during videofluoroscopy (VFSS), at baseline and following each of four thin liquid swallows. Blinded speech-language pathologists (SLPs) rated the audio recordings for voice quality using the GRBAS scale and the VFSS recordings for abnormal swallow onset, penetration-aspiration, airway closure, and pharyngeal residues. Acoustic measures of {\%} jitter, {\%} shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio were calculated using two /a/ vowel segments spliced from each voice recording. Preswallow to postswallow measures of voice-quality change were derived and the data were compared to determine the correspondence between perceived voice abnormalities, acoustic voice parameters, and radiographically confirmed swallowing abnormalities. The sensitivity of perceived postswallow changes in voice quality to dysphagia and penetration-aspiration was poor, ranging from 8 to 29{\%}. Specificity was stronger for both penetration-aspiration (75-94{\%}) and dysphagia (59-86{\%}). Acoustic measures of voice quality had moderate sensitivity and specificity for both dysphagia and penetration-aspiration. Overall, perceptual judgments of postswallow wet voice showed the strongest potential for detecting penetration-aspiration (relative risk = 3.24). We conclude that a clear postswallow voice quality provides reasonable evidence that penetration- aspiration and dysphagia are absent. However, observations of abnormal postswallow voice quality can be misleading and are not a valid indication that penetrationaspiration or dysphagia exists.",
keywords = "Deglutition, Deglutition disorders, Dysphagia, Screening, Sensitivity, Specificity, Swallowing, Videofluoroscopy, Voice",
author = "Ashley Waito and Bailey, {Gemma L.} and Sonja Molfenter and Zoratto, {Dana C.} and Steele, {Catriona M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00455-010-9282-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "125--134",
journal = "Dysphagia",
issn = "0179-051X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voice-quality abnormalities as a sign of dysphagia

T2 - Validation against acoustic and videofluoroscopic data

AU - Waito, Ashley

AU - Bailey, Gemma L.

AU - Molfenter, Sonja

AU - Zoratto, Dana C.

AU - Steele, Catriona M.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - In this study we explored the validity of clinician judgments of voice abnormalities as indicators of penetration-aspiration or other swallowing abnormalities. Voice samples were collected using a high-quality microphone from 40 adults during videofluoroscopy (VFSS), at baseline and following each of four thin liquid swallows. Blinded speech-language pathologists (SLPs) rated the audio recordings for voice quality using the GRBAS scale and the VFSS recordings for abnormal swallow onset, penetration-aspiration, airway closure, and pharyngeal residues. Acoustic measures of % jitter, % shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio were calculated using two /a/ vowel segments spliced from each voice recording. Preswallow to postswallow measures of voice-quality change were derived and the data were compared to determine the correspondence between perceived voice abnormalities, acoustic voice parameters, and radiographically confirmed swallowing abnormalities. The sensitivity of perceived postswallow changes in voice quality to dysphagia and penetration-aspiration was poor, ranging from 8 to 29%. Specificity was stronger for both penetration-aspiration (75-94%) and dysphagia (59-86%). Acoustic measures of voice quality had moderate sensitivity and specificity for both dysphagia and penetration-aspiration. Overall, perceptual judgments of postswallow wet voice showed the strongest potential for detecting penetration-aspiration (relative risk = 3.24). We conclude that a clear postswallow voice quality provides reasonable evidence that penetration- aspiration and dysphagia are absent. However, observations of abnormal postswallow voice quality can be misleading and are not a valid indication that penetrationaspiration or dysphagia exists.

AB - In this study we explored the validity of clinician judgments of voice abnormalities as indicators of penetration-aspiration or other swallowing abnormalities. Voice samples were collected using a high-quality microphone from 40 adults during videofluoroscopy (VFSS), at baseline and following each of four thin liquid swallows. Blinded speech-language pathologists (SLPs) rated the audio recordings for voice quality using the GRBAS scale and the VFSS recordings for abnormal swallow onset, penetration-aspiration, airway closure, and pharyngeal residues. Acoustic measures of % jitter, % shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio were calculated using two /a/ vowel segments spliced from each voice recording. Preswallow to postswallow measures of voice-quality change were derived and the data were compared to determine the correspondence between perceived voice abnormalities, acoustic voice parameters, and radiographically confirmed swallowing abnormalities. The sensitivity of perceived postswallow changes in voice quality to dysphagia and penetration-aspiration was poor, ranging from 8 to 29%. Specificity was stronger for both penetration-aspiration (75-94%) and dysphagia (59-86%). Acoustic measures of voice quality had moderate sensitivity and specificity for both dysphagia and penetration-aspiration. Overall, perceptual judgments of postswallow wet voice showed the strongest potential for detecting penetration-aspiration (relative risk = 3.24). We conclude that a clear postswallow voice quality provides reasonable evidence that penetration- aspiration and dysphagia are absent. However, observations of abnormal postswallow voice quality can be misleading and are not a valid indication that penetrationaspiration or dysphagia exists.

KW - Deglutition

KW - Deglutition disorders

KW - Dysphagia

KW - Screening

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

KW - Swallowing

KW - Videofluoroscopy

KW - Voice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051669828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051669828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00455-010-9282-4

DO - 10.1007/s00455-010-9282-4

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 125

EP - 134

JO - Dysphagia

JF - Dysphagia

SN - 0179-051X

IS - 2

ER -