Visual extrapolation under risk: Human observers estimate and compensate for exogenous uncertainty

Paul A. Warren, Erich W. Graf, Rebecca A. Champion, Laurence T. Maloney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Humans commonly face choices between multiple options with uncertain outcomes. Such situations occur in many contexts, from purely financial decisions (which shares should I buy?) to perceptuo-motor decisions between different actions (where should I aim my shot at goal?). Regardless of context, successful decision-making requires that the uncertainty at the heart of the decision-making problem is taken into account. Here, we ask whether humans can recover an estimate of exogenous uncertainty and then use it to make good decisions. Observers viewed a small dot that moved erratically until it disappeared behind an occluder. We varied the size of the occluder and the unpredictability of the dot's path. The observer attempted to capture the dot as it emerged from behind the occluded region by setting the location and extent of a 'catcher' along the edge of the occluder. The reward for successfully catching the dot was reduced as the size of the catcher increased. We compared human performance with that of an agent maximizing expected gain and found that observers consistently selected catcher size close to this theoretical solution. These results suggest that humans are finely tuned to exogenous uncertainty information and can exploit it to guide action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2171-2179
Number of pages9
JournalProceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society
Volume279
Issue number1736
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 7 2012

Fingerprint

Extrapolation
Uncertainty
uncertainty
Decision making
decision making
Decision Making
capture of animals
Reward
decision

Keywords

  • Cue combination
  • Decision under risk
  • Exogenous uncertainty
  • Maximum expected gain
  • Motion extrapolation
  • Statistical approaches

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Visual extrapolation under risk : Human observers estimate and compensate for exogenous uncertainty. / Warren, Paul A.; Graf, Erich W.; Champion, Rebecca A.; Maloney, Laurence T.

In: Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society, Vol. 279, No. 1736, 07.06.2012, p. 2171-2179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd98d24ad99d41a7801a2b1d4c927623,
title = "Visual extrapolation under risk: Human observers estimate and compensate for exogenous uncertainty",
abstract = "Humans commonly face choices between multiple options with uncertain outcomes. Such situations occur in many contexts, from purely financial decisions (which shares should I buy?) to perceptuo-motor decisions between different actions (where should I aim my shot at goal?). Regardless of context, successful decision-making requires that the uncertainty at the heart of the decision-making problem is taken into account. Here, we ask whether humans can recover an estimate of exogenous uncertainty and then use it to make good decisions. Observers viewed a small dot that moved erratically until it disappeared behind an occluder. We varied the size of the occluder and the unpredictability of the dot's path. The observer attempted to capture the dot as it emerged from behind the occluded region by setting the location and extent of a 'catcher' along the edge of the occluder. The reward for successfully catching the dot was reduced as the size of the catcher increased. We compared human performance with that of an agent maximizing expected gain and found that observers consistently selected catcher size close to this theoretical solution. These results suggest that humans are finely tuned to exogenous uncertainty information and can exploit it to guide action.",
keywords = "Cue combination, Decision under risk, Exogenous uncertainty, Maximum expected gain, Motion extrapolation, Statistical approaches",
author = "Warren, {Paul A.} and Graf, {Erich W.} and Champion, {Rebecca A.} and Maloney, {Laurence T.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1098/rspb.2011.2527",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "279",
pages = "2171--2179",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8452",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1736",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual extrapolation under risk

T2 - Human observers estimate and compensate for exogenous uncertainty

AU - Warren, Paul A.

AU - Graf, Erich W.

AU - Champion, Rebecca A.

AU - Maloney, Laurence T.

PY - 2012/6/7

Y1 - 2012/6/7

N2 - Humans commonly face choices between multiple options with uncertain outcomes. Such situations occur in many contexts, from purely financial decisions (which shares should I buy?) to perceptuo-motor decisions between different actions (where should I aim my shot at goal?). Regardless of context, successful decision-making requires that the uncertainty at the heart of the decision-making problem is taken into account. Here, we ask whether humans can recover an estimate of exogenous uncertainty and then use it to make good decisions. Observers viewed a small dot that moved erratically until it disappeared behind an occluder. We varied the size of the occluder and the unpredictability of the dot's path. The observer attempted to capture the dot as it emerged from behind the occluded region by setting the location and extent of a 'catcher' along the edge of the occluder. The reward for successfully catching the dot was reduced as the size of the catcher increased. We compared human performance with that of an agent maximizing expected gain and found that observers consistently selected catcher size close to this theoretical solution. These results suggest that humans are finely tuned to exogenous uncertainty information and can exploit it to guide action.

AB - Humans commonly face choices between multiple options with uncertain outcomes. Such situations occur in many contexts, from purely financial decisions (which shares should I buy?) to perceptuo-motor decisions between different actions (where should I aim my shot at goal?). Regardless of context, successful decision-making requires that the uncertainty at the heart of the decision-making problem is taken into account. Here, we ask whether humans can recover an estimate of exogenous uncertainty and then use it to make good decisions. Observers viewed a small dot that moved erratically until it disappeared behind an occluder. We varied the size of the occluder and the unpredictability of the dot's path. The observer attempted to capture the dot as it emerged from behind the occluded region by setting the location and extent of a 'catcher' along the edge of the occluder. The reward for successfully catching the dot was reduced as the size of the catcher increased. We compared human performance with that of an agent maximizing expected gain and found that observers consistently selected catcher size close to this theoretical solution. These results suggest that humans are finely tuned to exogenous uncertainty information and can exploit it to guide action.

KW - Cue combination

KW - Decision under risk

KW - Exogenous uncertainty

KW - Maximum expected gain

KW - Motion extrapolation

KW - Statistical approaches

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859965968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859965968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2011.2527

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2011.2527

M3 - Article

C2 - 22298845

AN - SCOPUS:84859965968

VL - 279

SP - 2171

EP - 2179

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8452

IS - 1736

ER -