Violence, publicity, and sovereignty: Lawlessness in Mumbai

Arvind Rajagopal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Lawless violence often preceded the rule of law. British sovereignty depended on non-state actors such as the East India Company, whose lawless acts provoked the demand in the British Parliament for the rule of law. Contemporary terrorism marks a time when lawless violence proliferates and territorial boundaries are infringed upon, when state leaders invoke 'non-state actors' and argue for the need to respond in kind. Today the state mimics the behavior of private parties, justifying violence as revenge and practicing torture as the just desserts of terrorists. If one intention of terrorism is to drive a wedge between the law and its representation, and unsettle our understanding of the relationship between violence and visibility, state responses to terrorism such as in Mumbai confirm that public spaces can become zones of suspended legality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-416
Number of pages6
JournalSocial Identities
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

publicity
sovereignty
violence
terrorism
constitutional state
retaliation
torture
legality
public space
parliament
leader
India
Law
demand

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Lawless violence
  • Media
  • Mumbai
  • Non-state actors
  • Politics of humanity
  • Sovereignty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Violence, publicity, and sovereignty : Lawlessness in Mumbai. / Rajagopal, Arvind.

In: Social Identities, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2009, p. 411-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rajagopal, Arvind. / Violence, publicity, and sovereignty : Lawlessness in Mumbai. In: Social Identities. 2009 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 411-416.
@article{3a5ab35b29654ea1b5c332bd0e0994ca,
title = "Violence, publicity, and sovereignty: Lawlessness in Mumbai",
abstract = "Lawless violence often preceded the rule of law. British sovereignty depended on non-state actors such as the East India Company, whose lawless acts provoked the demand in the British Parliament for the rule of law. Contemporary terrorism marks a time when lawless violence proliferates and territorial boundaries are infringed upon, when state leaders invoke 'non-state actors' and argue for the need to respond in kind. Today the state mimics the behavior of private parties, justifying violence as revenge and practicing torture as the just desserts of terrorists. If one intention of terrorism is to drive a wedge between the law and its representation, and unsettle our understanding of the relationship between violence and visibility, state responses to terrorism such as in Mumbai confirm that public spaces can become zones of suspended legality.",
keywords = "Democracy, Lawless violence, Media, Mumbai, Non-state actors, Politics of humanity, Sovereignty",
author = "Arvind Rajagopal",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/13504630902899390",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "411--416",
journal = "Social Identities",
issn = "1350-4630",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Violence, publicity, and sovereignty

T2 - Lawlessness in Mumbai

AU - Rajagopal, Arvind

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Lawless violence often preceded the rule of law. British sovereignty depended on non-state actors such as the East India Company, whose lawless acts provoked the demand in the British Parliament for the rule of law. Contemporary terrorism marks a time when lawless violence proliferates and territorial boundaries are infringed upon, when state leaders invoke 'non-state actors' and argue for the need to respond in kind. Today the state mimics the behavior of private parties, justifying violence as revenge and practicing torture as the just desserts of terrorists. If one intention of terrorism is to drive a wedge between the law and its representation, and unsettle our understanding of the relationship between violence and visibility, state responses to terrorism such as in Mumbai confirm that public spaces can become zones of suspended legality.

AB - Lawless violence often preceded the rule of law. British sovereignty depended on non-state actors such as the East India Company, whose lawless acts provoked the demand in the British Parliament for the rule of law. Contemporary terrorism marks a time when lawless violence proliferates and territorial boundaries are infringed upon, when state leaders invoke 'non-state actors' and argue for the need to respond in kind. Today the state mimics the behavior of private parties, justifying violence as revenge and practicing torture as the just desserts of terrorists. If one intention of terrorism is to drive a wedge between the law and its representation, and unsettle our understanding of the relationship between violence and visibility, state responses to terrorism such as in Mumbai confirm that public spaces can become zones of suspended legality.

KW - Democracy

KW - Lawless violence

KW - Media

KW - Mumbai

KW - Non-state actors

KW - Politics of humanity

KW - Sovereignty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650659364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650659364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13504630902899390

DO - 10.1080/13504630902899390

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67650659364

VL - 15

SP - 411

EP - 416

JO - Social Identities

JF - Social Identities

SN - 1350-4630

IS - 3

ER -