Victim and Perpetrator Groups’ Divergent Perspectives on Collective Violence: Implications for Intergroup Relations

Rezarta Bilali, Johanna Ray Vollhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Groups in conflict develop strikingly different construals of the same violent events. These clashing perceptions of past violence can have detrimental consequences for intergroup relations and might provoke new hostilities. In this article, we integrate and juxtapose what we know about construals of collective violence by delineating the different dimensions along which these construals differ between victim and perpetrator groups: regarding the question of who is the victim, who is responsible for the harm doing, what the perpetrator’s intent was, how severe the violence was, and when it took place. Then, we discuss the individual- and group-level factors (e.g., collective narratives, social identities) that shape these construals, as well as their implications for attitudes regarding the conflict and support for relevant policies. We distinguish two different core motives that drive construals and their outcomes among victim and perpetrator groups: Perpetrator groups try to cope with moral identity threats and preserve a positive image of the ingroup, while victim groups try to protect their ingroup from future harm doing and desire acknowledgment of their group’s experiences. Lastly, we discuss implications for strategies and interventions to address victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives of collective violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-108
Number of pages34
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume40
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Violence
violence
Group
Social Identification
Hostility
Construal
Perpetrators
threat
narrative
Conflict (Psychology)
event
Harm
experience

Keywords

  • acknowledgment
  • attributions
  • collective harm doing
  • collective narratives
  • collective victimization
  • collective violence
  • construals of violence
  • denial
  • reconciliation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Victim and Perpetrator Groups’ Divergent Perspectives on Collective Violence : Implications for Intergroup Relations. / Bilali, Rezarta; Vollhardt, Johanna Ray.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 40, No. S1, 01.02.2019, p. 75-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f048b38869f44fa185cbb87b981b0b5a,
title = "Victim and Perpetrator Groups’ Divergent Perspectives on Collective Violence: Implications for Intergroup Relations",
abstract = "Groups in conflict develop strikingly different construals of the same violent events. These clashing perceptions of past violence can have detrimental consequences for intergroup relations and might provoke new hostilities. In this article, we integrate and juxtapose what we know about construals of collective violence by delineating the different dimensions along which these construals differ between victim and perpetrator groups: regarding the question of who is the victim, who is responsible for the harm doing, what the perpetrator’s intent was, how severe the violence was, and when it took place. Then, we discuss the individual- and group-level factors (e.g., collective narratives, social identities) that shape these construals, as well as their implications for attitudes regarding the conflict and support for relevant policies. We distinguish two different core motives that drive construals and their outcomes among victim and perpetrator groups: Perpetrator groups try to cope with moral identity threats and preserve a positive image of the ingroup, while victim groups try to protect their ingroup from future harm doing and desire acknowledgment of their group’s experiences. Lastly, we discuss implications for strategies and interventions to address victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives of collective violence.",
keywords = "acknowledgment, attributions, collective harm doing, collective narratives, collective victimization, collective violence, construals of violence, denial, reconciliation",
author = "Rezarta Bilali and Vollhardt, {Johanna Ray}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12570",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "75--108",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Victim and Perpetrator Groups’ Divergent Perspectives on Collective Violence

T2 - Implications for Intergroup Relations

AU - Bilali, Rezarta

AU - Vollhardt, Johanna Ray

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Groups in conflict develop strikingly different construals of the same violent events. These clashing perceptions of past violence can have detrimental consequences for intergroup relations and might provoke new hostilities. In this article, we integrate and juxtapose what we know about construals of collective violence by delineating the different dimensions along which these construals differ between victim and perpetrator groups: regarding the question of who is the victim, who is responsible for the harm doing, what the perpetrator’s intent was, how severe the violence was, and when it took place. Then, we discuss the individual- and group-level factors (e.g., collective narratives, social identities) that shape these construals, as well as their implications for attitudes regarding the conflict and support for relevant policies. We distinguish two different core motives that drive construals and their outcomes among victim and perpetrator groups: Perpetrator groups try to cope with moral identity threats and preserve a positive image of the ingroup, while victim groups try to protect their ingroup from future harm doing and desire acknowledgment of their group’s experiences. Lastly, we discuss implications for strategies and interventions to address victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives of collective violence.

AB - Groups in conflict develop strikingly different construals of the same violent events. These clashing perceptions of past violence can have detrimental consequences for intergroup relations and might provoke new hostilities. In this article, we integrate and juxtapose what we know about construals of collective violence by delineating the different dimensions along which these construals differ between victim and perpetrator groups: regarding the question of who is the victim, who is responsible for the harm doing, what the perpetrator’s intent was, how severe the violence was, and when it took place. Then, we discuss the individual- and group-level factors (e.g., collective narratives, social identities) that shape these construals, as well as their implications for attitudes regarding the conflict and support for relevant policies. We distinguish two different core motives that drive construals and their outcomes among victim and perpetrator groups: Perpetrator groups try to cope with moral identity threats and preserve a positive image of the ingroup, while victim groups try to protect their ingroup from future harm doing and desire acknowledgment of their group’s experiences. Lastly, we discuss implications for strategies and interventions to address victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives of collective violence.

KW - acknowledgment

KW - attributions

KW - collective harm doing

KW - collective narratives

KW - collective victimization

KW - collective violence

KW - construals of violence

KW - denial

KW - reconciliation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063164716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063164716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12570

DO - 10.1111/pops.12570

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063164716

VL - 40

SP - 75

EP - 108

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - S1

ER -