Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: A political thepry of obfuscation

Finn Brunton, Helen Nissenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Computer-enabled data collection, aggregation, and mining dramatically change the nature of contemporary surveillance. Refusal is not a practical option, as data collection is an inherent condition of many essential societal transactions. We present one vernacular response to this regime of everyday surveillance, a tactic we call obfuscation. With a variety of possible motivations, actors engage in obfuscation by producing misleading, false, or ambiguous data with the intention of confusing an adversary or simply adding to the time or cost of separating bad data from good. Our paper develops a political philosophy of obfuscation, linking contemporary and historical cases to develop a descriptive account of obfuscation that is able to capture key commonalities in systems from radar chaff to BitTorrent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFirst Monday
Volume16
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

surveillance
Radar
data analysis
Agglomeration
political philosophy
aggregation
tactics
transaction
Costs
regime
costs
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Law

Cite this

Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis : A political thepry of obfuscation. / Brunton, Finn; Nissenbaum, Helen.

In: First Monday, Vol. 16, No. 5, 05.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{368cb20278df41eb8ae88da27323cbce,
title = "Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: A political thepry of obfuscation",
abstract = "Computer-enabled data collection, aggregation, and mining dramatically change the nature of contemporary surveillance. Refusal is not a practical option, as data collection is an inherent condition of many essential societal transactions. We present one vernacular response to this regime of everyday surveillance, a tactic we call obfuscation. With a variety of possible motivations, actors engage in obfuscation by producing misleading, false, or ambiguous data with the intention of confusing an adversary or simply adding to the time or cost of separating bad data from good. Our paper develops a political philosophy of obfuscation, linking contemporary and historical cases to develop a descriptive account of obfuscation that is able to capture key commonalities in systems from radar chaff to BitTorrent.",
author = "Finn Brunton and Helen Nissenbaum",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "First Monday",
issn = "1396-0466",
publisher = "First Monday",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis

T2 - A political thepry of obfuscation

AU - Brunton, Finn

AU - Nissenbaum, Helen

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Computer-enabled data collection, aggregation, and mining dramatically change the nature of contemporary surveillance. Refusal is not a practical option, as data collection is an inherent condition of many essential societal transactions. We present one vernacular response to this regime of everyday surveillance, a tactic we call obfuscation. With a variety of possible motivations, actors engage in obfuscation by producing misleading, false, or ambiguous data with the intention of confusing an adversary or simply adding to the time or cost of separating bad data from good. Our paper develops a political philosophy of obfuscation, linking contemporary and historical cases to develop a descriptive account of obfuscation that is able to capture key commonalities in systems from radar chaff to BitTorrent.

AB - Computer-enabled data collection, aggregation, and mining dramatically change the nature of contemporary surveillance. Refusal is not a practical option, as data collection is an inherent condition of many essential societal transactions. We present one vernacular response to this regime of everyday surveillance, a tactic we call obfuscation. With a variety of possible motivations, actors engage in obfuscation by producing misleading, false, or ambiguous data with the intention of confusing an adversary or simply adding to the time or cost of separating bad data from good. Our paper develops a political philosophy of obfuscation, linking contemporary and historical cases to develop a descriptive account of obfuscation that is able to capture key commonalities in systems from radar chaff to BitTorrent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958731816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958731816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79958731816

VL - 16

JO - First Monday

JF - First Monday

SN - 1396-0466

IS - 5

ER -