Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses

Joyce K. Edmonds, Michele O'Hara, Sean Clarke, Neel T. Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To examine variation in the cesarean birth rates of women cared for by labor and delivery nurses. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting One high-volume labor and delivery unit at an academic medical center in a major metropolitan area. Participants Labor and delivery nurses who cared for nulliparous women who gave birth to term, singleton fetuses in vertex presentation. Methods Data were extracted from electronic hospital birth records from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015. Cesarean rates for individual nurses were calculated based on the number of women they attended who gave birth by cesarean. Nurses were grouped into quartiles by their cesarean rates, and the effect of these rates on the likelihood of cesarean birth was estimated by a logit regression model adjusting for patient-level characteristics and clustering of births within nurses. Results Seventy-two nurses attended 3,031 births. The mean nurse cesarean rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [23.9, 28.1]) and ranged from 8.3% to 48%. The adjusted odds of cesarean for births attended by nurses in the highest quartile was nearly 3 times (odds ratio = 2.73, 95% confidence interval [2.3, 3.3]) greater than for births attended by nurses in the lowest quartile. Conclusion The labor and delivery nurse assigned to a woman may influence the likelihood of cesarean birth. Nurse-level cesarean birth data could be used to design practice improvement initiatives to improve nurse performance. More precise measurement of the relative influence of nurses on mode of birth is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)486-493
Number of pages8
JournalJOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Birth Rate
Nurses
Parturition
Confidence Intervals
Birth Certificates
Hospital Records
Cluster Analysis
Fetus
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • cesarean
  • measurement
  • nursing
  • quality indicators
  • variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics
  • Critical Care
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses. / Edmonds, Joyce K.; O'Hara, Michele; Clarke, Sean; Shah, Neel T.

In: JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, Vol. 46, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 486-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edmonds, Joyce K. ; O'Hara, Michele ; Clarke, Sean ; Shah, Neel T. / Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses. In: JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 2017 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 486-493.
@article{e69aa80756cd45c7b7fd5defd7ea9f61,
title = "Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses",
abstract = "Objective To examine variation in the cesarean birth rates of women cared for by labor and delivery nurses. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting One high-volume labor and delivery unit at an academic medical center in a major metropolitan area. Participants Labor and delivery nurses who cared for nulliparous women who gave birth to term, singleton fetuses in vertex presentation. Methods Data were extracted from electronic hospital birth records from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015. Cesarean rates for individual nurses were calculated based on the number of women they attended who gave birth by cesarean. Nurses were grouped into quartiles by their cesarean rates, and the effect of these rates on the likelihood of cesarean birth was estimated by a logit regression model adjusting for patient-level characteristics and clustering of births within nurses. Results Seventy-two nurses attended 3,031 births. The mean nurse cesarean rate was 26{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [23.9, 28.1]) and ranged from 8.3{\%} to 48{\%}. The adjusted odds of cesarean for births attended by nurses in the highest quartile was nearly 3 times (odds ratio = 2.73, 95{\%} confidence interval [2.3, 3.3]) greater than for births attended by nurses in the lowest quartile. Conclusion The labor and delivery nurse assigned to a woman may influence the likelihood of cesarean birth. Nurse-level cesarean birth data could be used to design practice improvement initiatives to improve nurse performance. More precise measurement of the relative influence of nurses on mode of birth is needed.",
keywords = "cesarean, measurement, nursing, quality indicators, variation",
author = "Edmonds, {Joyce K.} and Michele O'Hara and Sean Clarke and Shah, {Neel T.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "486--493",
journal = "JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing",
issn = "0884-2175",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses

AU - Edmonds, Joyce K.

AU - O'Hara, Michele

AU - Clarke, Sean

AU - Shah, Neel T.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Objective To examine variation in the cesarean birth rates of women cared for by labor and delivery nurses. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting One high-volume labor and delivery unit at an academic medical center in a major metropolitan area. Participants Labor and delivery nurses who cared for nulliparous women who gave birth to term, singleton fetuses in vertex presentation. Methods Data were extracted from electronic hospital birth records from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015. Cesarean rates for individual nurses were calculated based on the number of women they attended who gave birth by cesarean. Nurses were grouped into quartiles by their cesarean rates, and the effect of these rates on the likelihood of cesarean birth was estimated by a logit regression model adjusting for patient-level characteristics and clustering of births within nurses. Results Seventy-two nurses attended 3,031 births. The mean nurse cesarean rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [23.9, 28.1]) and ranged from 8.3% to 48%. The adjusted odds of cesarean for births attended by nurses in the highest quartile was nearly 3 times (odds ratio = 2.73, 95% confidence interval [2.3, 3.3]) greater than for births attended by nurses in the lowest quartile. Conclusion The labor and delivery nurse assigned to a woman may influence the likelihood of cesarean birth. Nurse-level cesarean birth data could be used to design practice improvement initiatives to improve nurse performance. More precise measurement of the relative influence of nurses on mode of birth is needed.

AB - Objective To examine variation in the cesarean birth rates of women cared for by labor and delivery nurses. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting One high-volume labor and delivery unit at an academic medical center in a major metropolitan area. Participants Labor and delivery nurses who cared for nulliparous women who gave birth to term, singleton fetuses in vertex presentation. Methods Data were extracted from electronic hospital birth records from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015. Cesarean rates for individual nurses were calculated based on the number of women they attended who gave birth by cesarean. Nurses were grouped into quartiles by their cesarean rates, and the effect of these rates on the likelihood of cesarean birth was estimated by a logit regression model adjusting for patient-level characteristics and clustering of births within nurses. Results Seventy-two nurses attended 3,031 births. The mean nurse cesarean rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [23.9, 28.1]) and ranged from 8.3% to 48%. The adjusted odds of cesarean for births attended by nurses in the highest quartile was nearly 3 times (odds ratio = 2.73, 95% confidence interval [2.3, 3.3]) greater than for births attended by nurses in the lowest quartile. Conclusion The labor and delivery nurse assigned to a woman may influence the likelihood of cesarean birth. Nurse-level cesarean birth data could be used to design practice improvement initiatives to improve nurse performance. More precise measurement of the relative influence of nurses on mode of birth is needed.

KW - cesarean

KW - measurement

KW - nursing

KW - quality indicators

KW - variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021807960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021807960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 28549612

AN - SCOPUS:85021807960

VL - 46

SP - 486

EP - 493

JO - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

JF - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

SN - 0884-2175

IS - 4

ER -