Validity of the bereavement exclusion to major depression: Does the empirical evidence support the proposal to eliminate the exclusion in DSM-5?

Jerome C. Wakefield, Michael B. First

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    The DSM-IV major depression "bereavement exclusion" (BE), which recognizes that depressive symptoms are sometimes normal in recently bereaved individuals, is proposed for elimination in DSM-5. Evidence cited for the BE's invalidity comes from two 2007 reviews purporting to show that bereavement-related depression is similar to other depression across various validators, and a 2010 review of subsequent research. We examined whether the 2007 and 2010 reviews and subsequent relevant literature support the BE's invalidity. Findings were: a) studies included in the 2007 reviews sampled bereavement-related depression groups most of whom were not BE-excluded, making them irrelevant for evaluating BE validity; b) three subsequent studies cited by the 2010 review as supporting BE elimination did examine BE-excluded cases but were in fact inconclusive; and c) two more recent articles comparing recurrence of BE-excluded and other major depressive disorder cases both support the BE's validity. We conclude that the claimed evidence for the BE's invalidity does not exist. The evidence in fact supports the BE's validity and its retention in DSM-5 to prevent false positive diagnoses. We suggest some improvements to increase validity and mitigate risk of false negatives.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)3-10
    Number of pages8
    JournalWorld Psychiatry
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

    Fingerprint

    Bereavement
    Depression
    Major Depressive Disorder
    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
    Recurrence

    Keywords

    • Bereavement
    • Diagnosis
    • DSM-5
    • Grief
    • Harmful dysfunction
    • Major depression
    • Validity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Phychiatric Mental Health
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    Validity of the bereavement exclusion to major depression : Does the empirical evidence support the proposal to eliminate the exclusion in DSM-5? / Wakefield, Jerome C.; First, Michael B.

    In: World Psychiatry, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 3-10.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    @article{0bb3f57cead544a7be77c850e94d2a03,
    title = "Validity of the bereavement exclusion to major depression: Does the empirical evidence support the proposal to eliminate the exclusion in DSM-5?",
    abstract = "The DSM-IV major depression {"}bereavement exclusion{"} (BE), which recognizes that depressive symptoms are sometimes normal in recently bereaved individuals, is proposed for elimination in DSM-5. Evidence cited for the BE's invalidity comes from two 2007 reviews purporting to show that bereavement-related depression is similar to other depression across various validators, and a 2010 review of subsequent research. We examined whether the 2007 and 2010 reviews and subsequent relevant literature support the BE's invalidity. Findings were: a) studies included in the 2007 reviews sampled bereavement-related depression groups most of whom were not BE-excluded, making them irrelevant for evaluating BE validity; b) three subsequent studies cited by the 2010 review as supporting BE elimination did examine BE-excluded cases but were in fact inconclusive; and c) two more recent articles comparing recurrence of BE-excluded and other major depressive disorder cases both support the BE's validity. We conclude that the claimed evidence for the BE's invalidity does not exist. The evidence in fact supports the BE's validity and its retention in DSM-5 to prevent false positive diagnoses. We suggest some improvements to increase validity and mitigate risk of false negatives.",
    keywords = "Bereavement, Diagnosis, DSM-5, Grief, Harmful dysfunction, Major depression, Validity",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.} and First, {Michael B.}",
    year = "2012",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "3--10",
    journal = "World Psychiatry",
    issn = "1723-8617",
    publisher = "Masson SpA",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Validity of the bereavement exclusion to major depression

    T2 - Does the empirical evidence support the proposal to eliminate the exclusion in DSM-5?

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    AU - First, Michael B.

    PY - 2012/1/1

    Y1 - 2012/1/1

    N2 - The DSM-IV major depression "bereavement exclusion" (BE), which recognizes that depressive symptoms are sometimes normal in recently bereaved individuals, is proposed for elimination in DSM-5. Evidence cited for the BE's invalidity comes from two 2007 reviews purporting to show that bereavement-related depression is similar to other depression across various validators, and a 2010 review of subsequent research. We examined whether the 2007 and 2010 reviews and subsequent relevant literature support the BE's invalidity. Findings were: a) studies included in the 2007 reviews sampled bereavement-related depression groups most of whom were not BE-excluded, making them irrelevant for evaluating BE validity; b) three subsequent studies cited by the 2010 review as supporting BE elimination did examine BE-excluded cases but were in fact inconclusive; and c) two more recent articles comparing recurrence of BE-excluded and other major depressive disorder cases both support the BE's validity. We conclude that the claimed evidence for the BE's invalidity does not exist. The evidence in fact supports the BE's validity and its retention in DSM-5 to prevent false positive diagnoses. We suggest some improvements to increase validity and mitigate risk of false negatives.

    AB - The DSM-IV major depression "bereavement exclusion" (BE), which recognizes that depressive symptoms are sometimes normal in recently bereaved individuals, is proposed for elimination in DSM-5. Evidence cited for the BE's invalidity comes from two 2007 reviews purporting to show that bereavement-related depression is similar to other depression across various validators, and a 2010 review of subsequent research. We examined whether the 2007 and 2010 reviews and subsequent relevant literature support the BE's invalidity. Findings were: a) studies included in the 2007 reviews sampled bereavement-related depression groups most of whom were not BE-excluded, making them irrelevant for evaluating BE validity; b) three subsequent studies cited by the 2010 review as supporting BE elimination did examine BE-excluded cases but were in fact inconclusive; and c) two more recent articles comparing recurrence of BE-excluded and other major depressive disorder cases both support the BE's validity. We conclude that the claimed evidence for the BE's invalidity does not exist. The evidence in fact supports the BE's validity and its retention in DSM-5 to prevent false positive diagnoses. We suggest some improvements to increase validity and mitigate risk of false negatives.

    KW - Bereavement

    KW - Diagnosis

    KW - DSM-5

    KW - Grief

    KW - Harmful dysfunction

    KW - Major depression

    KW - Validity

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857214256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857214256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.002

    M3 - Review article

    C2 - 22294996

    AN - SCOPUS:84857214256

    VL - 11

    SP - 3

    EP - 10

    JO - World Psychiatry

    JF - World Psychiatry

    SN - 1723-8617

    IS - 1

    ER -