Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Unrealistic Relationship Expectations

Heather M. Foran, Amy M. Smith Slep

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cognitive models of intimate partner aggression implicate maladaptive relationship beliefs as antecedents to aggression and targets for intervention. However, existing self-report measures of relationship beliefs have failed to differentiate aggressive and nonaggressive individuals, raising questions about their assessment of and role in understanding aggression. To address these concerns, the authors developed and tested a new measure of unrealistic relationship beliefs in a sample of 453 community couples. Structural validity, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and temporal stability of the new measure were examined. The final scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency (αs = .83-.84), test-retest reliability (rs = .68-.74), and concurrent validity (small to moderate associations with predicted variables). Unrealistic relationship beliefs significantly differentiated aggressive and nonaggressive men, and this association remained significant after the authors controlled for other related variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)382-396
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Self Report
Aggression
Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • assessment
  • intimate partner violence
  • psychometric properties
  • unrealistic expectations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Unrealistic Relationship Expectations. / Foran, Heather M.; Smith Slep, Amy M.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 4, 12.2007, p. 382-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7244f004afd44e8c9ce725a3ff9c132f,
title = "Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Unrealistic Relationship Expectations",
abstract = "Cognitive models of intimate partner aggression implicate maladaptive relationship beliefs as antecedents to aggression and targets for intervention. However, existing self-report measures of relationship beliefs have failed to differentiate aggressive and nonaggressive individuals, raising questions about their assessment of and role in understanding aggression. To address these concerns, the authors developed and tested a new measure of unrealistic relationship beliefs in a sample of 453 community couples. Structural validity, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and temporal stability of the new measure were examined. The final scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency (αs = .83-.84), test-retest reliability (rs = .68-.74), and concurrent validity (small to moderate associations with predicted variables). Unrealistic relationship beliefs significantly differentiated aggressive and nonaggressive men, and this association remained significant after the authors controlled for other related variables.",
keywords = "assessment, intimate partner violence, psychometric properties, unrealistic expectations",
author = "Foran, {Heather M.} and {Smith Slep}, {Amy M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.382",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "382--396",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Unrealistic Relationship Expectations

AU - Foran, Heather M.

AU - Smith Slep, Amy M.

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Cognitive models of intimate partner aggression implicate maladaptive relationship beliefs as antecedents to aggression and targets for intervention. However, existing self-report measures of relationship beliefs have failed to differentiate aggressive and nonaggressive individuals, raising questions about their assessment of and role in understanding aggression. To address these concerns, the authors developed and tested a new measure of unrealistic relationship beliefs in a sample of 453 community couples. Structural validity, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and temporal stability of the new measure were examined. The final scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency (αs = .83-.84), test-retest reliability (rs = .68-.74), and concurrent validity (small to moderate associations with predicted variables). Unrealistic relationship beliefs significantly differentiated aggressive and nonaggressive men, and this association remained significant after the authors controlled for other related variables.

AB - Cognitive models of intimate partner aggression implicate maladaptive relationship beliefs as antecedents to aggression and targets for intervention. However, existing self-report measures of relationship beliefs have failed to differentiate aggressive and nonaggressive individuals, raising questions about their assessment of and role in understanding aggression. To address these concerns, the authors developed and tested a new measure of unrealistic relationship beliefs in a sample of 453 community couples. Structural validity, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and temporal stability of the new measure were examined. The final scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency (αs = .83-.84), test-retest reliability (rs = .68-.74), and concurrent validity (small to moderate associations with predicted variables). Unrealistic relationship beliefs significantly differentiated aggressive and nonaggressive men, and this association remained significant after the authors controlled for other related variables.

KW - assessment

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - psychometric properties

KW - unrealistic expectations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349109937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349109937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.382

DO - 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.382

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 382

EP - 396

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 4

ER -