Use of ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in ayurvedic clinical trials: A literature review focused on research methods

Bhupinder S. Brar, Richa Chhibber, Vani Murthy H Srinivasa, Bianca A. Dearing, Richard McGowan, Ralph Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this literature review is to evaluate whether Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria or Western medicine diagnostic criteria have been used in published clinical trials testing an Ayurvedic intervention/treatment. Design: The PubMed, Embase, and Allied and Complementary Medicine databases were searched to identify Ayurvedic clinical trials published from 1980 to 2009. A total of 45 Ayurvedic clinical trials were identified and grouped into two time periods: pre-and post-2000 periods. Each article was independently reviewed by two calibrated reviewers. Results: Analysis revealed that not 1 of these 45 studies, in either time period, reported "only-and-full" use of the 23 available Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria. In fact, 24.4% of these 45 articles never specified any diagnostic criteria at all. While the percentage of articles using Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria (either as "only use" or "combined use with Western Medicine diagnostic criteria") doubled over the two time periods (27.7% to 59%), rarely were more than 2 of the 23 Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria ever used. Conclusions: To improve confidence in their findings, future studies should strive to correct this observed inappropriate and gross underuse of Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in the designing of clinical studies that aim to rigorously test the effectiveness of Ayurvedic treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-28
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Clinical Trials
Research
Medicine
Complementary Therapies
PubMed
Databases
Therapeutics
Clinical Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Use of ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in ayurvedic clinical trials : A literature review focused on research methods. / Brar, Bhupinder S.; Chhibber, Richa; Srinivasa, Vani Murthy H; Dearing, Bianca A.; McGowan, Richard; Katz, Ralph.

In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 20-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brar, Bhupinder S. ; Chhibber, Richa ; Srinivasa, Vani Murthy H ; Dearing, Bianca A. ; McGowan, Richard ; Katz, Ralph. / Use of ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in ayurvedic clinical trials : A literature review focused on research methods. In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 20-28.
@article{7123b3a961e24459b444587dd009a4df,
title = "Use of ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in ayurvedic clinical trials: A literature review focused on research methods",
abstract = "Objectives: The objective of this literature review is to evaluate whether Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria or Western medicine diagnostic criteria have been used in published clinical trials testing an Ayurvedic intervention/treatment. Design: The PubMed, Embase, and Allied and Complementary Medicine databases were searched to identify Ayurvedic clinical trials published from 1980 to 2009. A total of 45 Ayurvedic clinical trials were identified and grouped into two time periods: pre-and post-2000 periods. Each article was independently reviewed by two calibrated reviewers. Results: Analysis revealed that not 1 of these 45 studies, in either time period, reported {"}only-and-full{"} use of the 23 available Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria. In fact, 24.4{\%} of these 45 articles never specified any diagnostic criteria at all. While the percentage of articles using Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria (either as {"}only use{"} or {"}combined use with Western Medicine diagnostic criteria{"}) doubled over the two time periods (27.7{\%} to 59{\%}), rarely were more than 2 of the 23 Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria ever used. Conclusions: To improve confidence in their findings, future studies should strive to correct this observed inappropriate and gross underuse of Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in the designing of clinical studies that aim to rigorously test the effectiveness of Ayurvedic treatments.",
author = "Brar, {Bhupinder S.} and Richa Chhibber and Srinivasa, {Vani Murthy H} and Dearing, {Bianca A.} and Richard McGowan and Ralph Katz",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/acm.2010.0671",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "20--28",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in ayurvedic clinical trials

T2 - A literature review focused on research methods

AU - Brar, Bhupinder S.

AU - Chhibber, Richa

AU - Srinivasa, Vani Murthy H

AU - Dearing, Bianca A.

AU - McGowan, Richard

AU - Katz, Ralph

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The objective of this literature review is to evaluate whether Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria or Western medicine diagnostic criteria have been used in published clinical trials testing an Ayurvedic intervention/treatment. Design: The PubMed, Embase, and Allied and Complementary Medicine databases were searched to identify Ayurvedic clinical trials published from 1980 to 2009. A total of 45 Ayurvedic clinical trials were identified and grouped into two time periods: pre-and post-2000 periods. Each article was independently reviewed by two calibrated reviewers. Results: Analysis revealed that not 1 of these 45 studies, in either time period, reported "only-and-full" use of the 23 available Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria. In fact, 24.4% of these 45 articles never specified any diagnostic criteria at all. While the percentage of articles using Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria (either as "only use" or "combined use with Western Medicine diagnostic criteria") doubled over the two time periods (27.7% to 59%), rarely were more than 2 of the 23 Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria ever used. Conclusions: To improve confidence in their findings, future studies should strive to correct this observed inappropriate and gross underuse of Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in the designing of clinical studies that aim to rigorously test the effectiveness of Ayurvedic treatments.

AB - Objectives: The objective of this literature review is to evaluate whether Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria or Western medicine diagnostic criteria have been used in published clinical trials testing an Ayurvedic intervention/treatment. Design: The PubMed, Embase, and Allied and Complementary Medicine databases were searched to identify Ayurvedic clinical trials published from 1980 to 2009. A total of 45 Ayurvedic clinical trials were identified and grouped into two time periods: pre-and post-2000 periods. Each article was independently reviewed by two calibrated reviewers. Results: Analysis revealed that not 1 of these 45 studies, in either time period, reported "only-and-full" use of the 23 available Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria. In fact, 24.4% of these 45 articles never specified any diagnostic criteria at all. While the percentage of articles using Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria (either as "only use" or "combined use with Western Medicine diagnostic criteria") doubled over the two time periods (27.7% to 59%), rarely were more than 2 of the 23 Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria ever used. Conclusions: To improve confidence in their findings, future studies should strive to correct this observed inappropriate and gross underuse of Ayurvedic diagnostic criteria in the designing of clinical studies that aim to rigorously test the effectiveness of Ayurvedic treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856244386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856244386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/acm.2010.0671

DO - 10.1089/acm.2010.0671

M3 - Article

C2 - 22236031

AN - SCOPUS:84856244386

VL - 18

SP - 20

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 1

ER -