Use of a 24-hour recall diary to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

Karen M. Emmons, Bess H. Marcus, David Abrams, Robert Marshall, Thomas E. Novotny, Margaret E. Kane, Ruth A. Etzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Methods to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke need to be valid and relatively easy to use. We therefore explored the use of a 24-h environmental tobacco smoke exposure-recall diary by comparing data from the 24-h diary with questionnaire responses and levels of salivary cotinine—a biochemical marker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. A total of 875 nonsmokers at five Rhode Island worksites participated in the study. Twenty-five percent of the participants lived with smokers, and 96% had regular exposure to environmental tobacco smoke at work. Individuals who lived with smokers reported more exposures in the 24-h diary, both outside of work and during work hours, compared with those who had no smokers in their household. The correlation between saliva cotinine concentrations and the exposures recorded in the diary was weak (r =.10). Brief instruments for assessment of environmental tobacco smoke should be viewed cautiously, and use of this 24-h recall diary is not recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-149
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Environmental Health
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 1996

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Environmental Exposure
Smoke
Cotinine
saliva
Saliva
Workplace
Biomarkers
exposure
tobacco smoke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Emmons, K. M., Marcus, B. H., Abrams, D., Marshall, R., Novotny, T. E., Kane, M. E., & Etzel, R. A. (1996). Use of a 24-hour recall diary to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Archives of Environmental Health, 51(2), 146-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1996.9936008

Use of a 24-hour recall diary to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. / Emmons, Karen M.; Marcus, Bess H.; Abrams, David; Marshall, Robert; Novotny, Thomas E.; Kane, Margaret E.; Etzel, Ruth A.

In: Archives of Environmental Health, Vol. 51, No. 2, 01.04.1996, p. 146-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Emmons, KM, Marcus, BH, Abrams, D, Marshall, R, Novotny, TE, Kane, ME & Etzel, RA 1996, 'Use of a 24-hour recall diary to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke', Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 146-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1996.9936008
Emmons, Karen M. ; Marcus, Bess H. ; Abrams, David ; Marshall, Robert ; Novotny, Thomas E. ; Kane, Margaret E. ; Etzel, Ruth A. / Use of a 24-hour recall diary to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. In: Archives of Environmental Health. 1996 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 146-149.
@article{c013003ef532477abaf2079096c682b1,
title = "Use of a 24-hour recall diary to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke",
abstract = "Methods to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke need to be valid and relatively easy to use. We therefore explored the use of a 24-h environmental tobacco smoke exposure-recall diary by comparing data from the 24-h diary with questionnaire responses and levels of salivary cotinine—a biochemical marker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. A total of 875 nonsmokers at five Rhode Island worksites participated in the study. Twenty-five percent of the participants lived with smokers, and 96{\%} had regular exposure to environmental tobacco smoke at work. Individuals who lived with smokers reported more exposures in the 24-h diary, both outside of work and during work hours, compared with those who had no smokers in their household. The correlation between saliva cotinine concentrations and the exposures recorded in the diary was weak (r =.10). Brief instruments for assessment of environmental tobacco smoke should be viewed cautiously, and use of this 24-h recall diary is not recommended.",
author = "Emmons, {Karen M.} and Marcus, {Bess H.} and David Abrams and Robert Marshall and Novotny, {Thomas E.} and Kane, {Margaret E.} and Etzel, {Ruth A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00039896.1996.9936008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "146--149",
journal = "Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health",
issn = "1933-8244",
publisher = "Heldref Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a 24-hour recall diary to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

AU - Emmons, Karen M.

AU - Marcus, Bess H.

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Marshall, Robert

AU - Novotny, Thomas E.

AU - Kane, Margaret E.

AU - Etzel, Ruth A.

PY - 1996/4/1

Y1 - 1996/4/1

N2 - Methods to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke need to be valid and relatively easy to use. We therefore explored the use of a 24-h environmental tobacco smoke exposure-recall diary by comparing data from the 24-h diary with questionnaire responses and levels of salivary cotinine—a biochemical marker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. A total of 875 nonsmokers at five Rhode Island worksites participated in the study. Twenty-five percent of the participants lived with smokers, and 96% had regular exposure to environmental tobacco smoke at work. Individuals who lived with smokers reported more exposures in the 24-h diary, both outside of work and during work hours, compared with those who had no smokers in their household. The correlation between saliva cotinine concentrations and the exposures recorded in the diary was weak (r =.10). Brief instruments for assessment of environmental tobacco smoke should be viewed cautiously, and use of this 24-h recall diary is not recommended.

AB - Methods to assess exposure to environmental tobacco smoke need to be valid and relatively easy to use. We therefore explored the use of a 24-h environmental tobacco smoke exposure-recall diary by comparing data from the 24-h diary with questionnaire responses and levels of salivary cotinine—a biochemical marker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. A total of 875 nonsmokers at five Rhode Island worksites participated in the study. Twenty-five percent of the participants lived with smokers, and 96% had regular exposure to environmental tobacco smoke at work. Individuals who lived with smokers reported more exposures in the 24-h diary, both outside of work and during work hours, compared with those who had no smokers in their household. The correlation between saliva cotinine concentrations and the exposures recorded in the diary was weak (r =.10). Brief instruments for assessment of environmental tobacco smoke should be viewed cautiously, and use of this 24-h recall diary is not recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029918104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029918104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00039896.1996.9936008

DO - 10.1080/00039896.1996.9936008

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 146

EP - 149

JO - Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health

JF - Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health

SN - 1933-8244

IS - 2

ER -