Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship

Ted Brader, Joshua Tucker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    What factors enable and motivate citizens to form partisan identities? Popular accounts, as well as several major theoretical approaches, attribute a central role for policy and ideological concerns in shaping the partisan orientations of voters. Information about the policy aims of parties should therefore, on average, make it easier for an individual to find a party that best fits her views, especially if she had previously been less familiar with the parties. The evidence for this is mixed, however. Plenty of studies find a robust correlation between policy views and partisanship. Yet there is mounting evidence that citizens look to parties to decide where to stand on policy issues, suggesting that partisan identification precedes policy preferences. We bring new evidence to bear by investigating directly the impact of substantive policy information on the partisan identities of ordinary citizens. To do this, we carry out a pair of original experiments across six countries, five of which are relatively young or unstable party systems. One experiment informs citizens about the policy goals of the major parties; we find little to no evidence that such information affects levels of partisanship. The other experiment tests the impact of inviting citizens to evaluate and compare their own position to the positions of the major parties, a more direct test of the sort of reasoning posited in some theoretical accounts. We find that this reflective task in fact depresses levels of partisanship, perhaps especially among those who knew less about politics and parties from the outset. This suggests that thinking about policy differences and proximities pushes citizens away from partisan attachments they form in the ordinary course of life, perhaps because such thinking generates fresh doubts or focuses attention on facets of partisan choice that matter less in typical processes of preference formation.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)137-157
    Number of pages21
    JournalPolitical Psychology
    Volume39
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    information policy
    citizen
    evaluation
    evidence
    experiment
    party system
    Evaluation
    Partisan
    Partisanship
    Politics
    politics
    Experiment

    Keywords

    • Bulgaria
    • experimental analysis
    • experiments
    • Great Britain
    • Hungary
    • Moldova
    • partisanship
    • party identification
    • Poland
    • Russia

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science and International Relations

    Cite this

    Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship. / Brader, Ted; Tucker, Joshua.

    In: Political Psychology, Vol. 39, 01.02.2018, p. 137-157.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{57eec595154b4800af5423bb81b91e0a,
    title = "Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship",
    abstract = "What factors enable and motivate citizens to form partisan identities? Popular accounts, as well as several major theoretical approaches, attribute a central role for policy and ideological concerns in shaping the partisan orientations of voters. Information about the policy aims of parties should therefore, on average, make it easier for an individual to find a party that best fits her views, especially if she had previously been less familiar with the parties. The evidence for this is mixed, however. Plenty of studies find a robust correlation between policy views and partisanship. Yet there is mounting evidence that citizens look to parties to decide where to stand on policy issues, suggesting that partisan identification precedes policy preferences. We bring new evidence to bear by investigating directly the impact of substantive policy information on the partisan identities of ordinary citizens. To do this, we carry out a pair of original experiments across six countries, five of which are relatively young or unstable party systems. One experiment informs citizens about the policy goals of the major parties; we find little to no evidence that such information affects levels of partisanship. The other experiment tests the impact of inviting citizens to evaluate and compare their own position to the positions of the major parties, a more direct test of the sort of reasoning posited in some theoretical accounts. We find that this reflective task in fact depresses levels of partisanship, perhaps especially among those who knew less about politics and parties from the outset. This suggests that thinking about policy differences and proximities pushes citizens away from partisan attachments they form in the ordinary course of life, perhaps because such thinking generates fresh doubts or focuses attention on facets of partisan choice that matter less in typical processes of preference formation.",
    keywords = "Bulgaria, experimental analysis, experiments, Great Britain, Hungary, Moldova, partisanship, party identification, Poland, Russia",
    author = "Ted Brader and Joshua Tucker",
    year = "2018",
    month = "2",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/pops.12480",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "137--157",
    journal = "Political Psychology",
    issn = "0162-895X",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship

    AU - Brader, Ted

    AU - Tucker, Joshua

    PY - 2018/2/1

    Y1 - 2018/2/1

    N2 - What factors enable and motivate citizens to form partisan identities? Popular accounts, as well as several major theoretical approaches, attribute a central role for policy and ideological concerns in shaping the partisan orientations of voters. Information about the policy aims of parties should therefore, on average, make it easier for an individual to find a party that best fits her views, especially if she had previously been less familiar with the parties. The evidence for this is mixed, however. Plenty of studies find a robust correlation between policy views and partisanship. Yet there is mounting evidence that citizens look to parties to decide where to stand on policy issues, suggesting that partisan identification precedes policy preferences. We bring new evidence to bear by investigating directly the impact of substantive policy information on the partisan identities of ordinary citizens. To do this, we carry out a pair of original experiments across six countries, five of which are relatively young or unstable party systems. One experiment informs citizens about the policy goals of the major parties; we find little to no evidence that such information affects levels of partisanship. The other experiment tests the impact of inviting citizens to evaluate and compare their own position to the positions of the major parties, a more direct test of the sort of reasoning posited in some theoretical accounts. We find that this reflective task in fact depresses levels of partisanship, perhaps especially among those who knew less about politics and parties from the outset. This suggests that thinking about policy differences and proximities pushes citizens away from partisan attachments they form in the ordinary course of life, perhaps because such thinking generates fresh doubts or focuses attention on facets of partisan choice that matter less in typical processes of preference formation.

    AB - What factors enable and motivate citizens to form partisan identities? Popular accounts, as well as several major theoretical approaches, attribute a central role for policy and ideological concerns in shaping the partisan orientations of voters. Information about the policy aims of parties should therefore, on average, make it easier for an individual to find a party that best fits her views, especially if she had previously been less familiar with the parties. The evidence for this is mixed, however. Plenty of studies find a robust correlation between policy views and partisanship. Yet there is mounting evidence that citizens look to parties to decide where to stand on policy issues, suggesting that partisan identification precedes policy preferences. We bring new evidence to bear by investigating directly the impact of substantive policy information on the partisan identities of ordinary citizens. To do this, we carry out a pair of original experiments across six countries, five of which are relatively young or unstable party systems. One experiment informs citizens about the policy goals of the major parties; we find little to no evidence that such information affects levels of partisanship. The other experiment tests the impact of inviting citizens to evaluate and compare their own position to the positions of the major parties, a more direct test of the sort of reasoning posited in some theoretical accounts. We find that this reflective task in fact depresses levels of partisanship, perhaps especially among those who knew less about politics and parties from the outset. This suggests that thinking about policy differences and proximities pushes citizens away from partisan attachments they form in the ordinary course of life, perhaps because such thinking generates fresh doubts or focuses attention on facets of partisan choice that matter less in typical processes of preference formation.

    KW - Bulgaria

    KW - experimental analysis

    KW - experiments

    KW - Great Britain

    KW - Hungary

    KW - Moldova

    KW - partisanship

    KW - party identification

    KW - Poland

    KW - Russia

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042137471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042137471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/pops.12480

    DO - 10.1111/pops.12480

    M3 - Article

    VL - 39

    SP - 137

    EP - 157

    JO - Political Psychology

    JF - Political Psychology

    SN - 0162-895X

    ER -