Unmasking the CA1 ensemble place code by exposures to small and large environments: More place cells and multiple, irregularly arranged, and expanded place fields in the larger space

Andre Fenton, Hsin Y. Kao, Samuel A. Neymotin, Andrey Olypher, Yevgeniy Vayntrub, William W. Lytton, Nandor Ludvig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In standard experimental environments, a constant proportion of CA1 principal cells are place cells, each with a spatial receptive field called a place field. Although the properties of place cells are a basis for understanding the mammalian representation of spatial knowledge, there is no consensus on which of the two fundamental neural-coding hypotheses correctly accounts for how place cells encode spatial information. Within the dedicated-coding hypothesis, the current activity of each cell is an independent estimate of the location with respect to its place field. The average of the location estimates from many cells represents current location, so a dedicated place code would degrade if single cells had multiple place fields. Within the alternative, ensemble-coding hypothesis, the concurrent discharge of many place cells is a vector that represents current location. An ensemble place code is not degraded if single cells have multiple place fields as long as the discharge vector at each location is unique. Place cells with multiple place fields might be required to represent the substantially larger space in more natural environments. To distinguish between the dedicated-coding and ensemble-coding hypotheses, we compared the characteristics of CA1 place fields in a standard cylinder and an approximately six times larger chamber. Compared with the cylinder, in the chamber, more CA1 neurons were place cells, each with multiple, irregularly arranged, and enlarged place fields. The results indicate that multiple place fields is a fundamental feature of CA1 place cell activity and that, consequently, an ensemble place code is required for CA1 discharge to accurately signal location.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11250-11262
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume28
Issue number44
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 29 2008

Fingerprint

Place Cells
Neurons

Keywords

  • CA1
  • Extracellular recording
  • Hippocampal function
  • Hippocampus
  • Neuronal ensembles
  • Place cells
  • Spatial cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Unmasking the CA1 ensemble place code by exposures to small and large environments : More place cells and multiple, irregularly arranged, and expanded place fields in the larger space. / Fenton, Andre; Kao, Hsin Y.; Neymotin, Samuel A.; Olypher, Andrey; Vayntrub, Yevgeniy; Lytton, William W.; Ludvig, Nandor.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 28, No. 44, 29.10.2008, p. 11250-11262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fenton, Andre ; Kao, Hsin Y. ; Neymotin, Samuel A. ; Olypher, Andrey ; Vayntrub, Yevgeniy ; Lytton, William W. ; Ludvig, Nandor. / Unmasking the CA1 ensemble place code by exposures to small and large environments : More place cells and multiple, irregularly arranged, and expanded place fields in the larger space. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2008 ; Vol. 28, No. 44. pp. 11250-11262.
@article{59f0a8cb51c3489e8ab341eafcbcc2b1,
title = "Unmasking the CA1 ensemble place code by exposures to small and large environments: More place cells and multiple, irregularly arranged, and expanded place fields in the larger space",
abstract = "In standard experimental environments, a constant proportion of CA1 principal cells are place cells, each with a spatial receptive field called a place field. Although the properties of place cells are a basis for understanding the mammalian representation of spatial knowledge, there is no consensus on which of the two fundamental neural-coding hypotheses correctly accounts for how place cells encode spatial information. Within the dedicated-coding hypothesis, the current activity of each cell is an independent estimate of the location with respect to its place field. The average of the location estimates from many cells represents current location, so a dedicated place code would degrade if single cells had multiple place fields. Within the alternative, ensemble-coding hypothesis, the concurrent discharge of many place cells is a vector that represents current location. An ensemble place code is not degraded if single cells have multiple place fields as long as the discharge vector at each location is unique. Place cells with multiple place fields might be required to represent the substantially larger space in more natural environments. To distinguish between the dedicated-coding and ensemble-coding hypotheses, we compared the characteristics of CA1 place fields in a standard cylinder and an approximately six times larger chamber. Compared with the cylinder, in the chamber, more CA1 neurons were place cells, each with multiple, irregularly arranged, and enlarged place fields. The results indicate that multiple place fields is a fundamental feature of CA1 place cell activity and that, consequently, an ensemble place code is required for CA1 discharge to accurately signal location.",
keywords = "CA1, Extracellular recording, Hippocampal function, Hippocampus, Neuronal ensembles, Place cells, Spatial cognition",
author = "Andre Fenton and Kao, {Hsin Y.} and Neymotin, {Samuel A.} and Andrey Olypher and Yevgeniy Vayntrub and Lytton, {William W.} and Nandor Ludvig",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2862-08.2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "11250--11262",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "44",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unmasking the CA1 ensemble place code by exposures to small and large environments

T2 - More place cells and multiple, irregularly arranged, and expanded place fields in the larger space

AU - Fenton, Andre

AU - Kao, Hsin Y.

AU - Neymotin, Samuel A.

AU - Olypher, Andrey

AU - Vayntrub, Yevgeniy

AU - Lytton, William W.

AU - Ludvig, Nandor

PY - 2008/10/29

Y1 - 2008/10/29

N2 - In standard experimental environments, a constant proportion of CA1 principal cells are place cells, each with a spatial receptive field called a place field. Although the properties of place cells are a basis for understanding the mammalian representation of spatial knowledge, there is no consensus on which of the two fundamental neural-coding hypotheses correctly accounts for how place cells encode spatial information. Within the dedicated-coding hypothesis, the current activity of each cell is an independent estimate of the location with respect to its place field. The average of the location estimates from many cells represents current location, so a dedicated place code would degrade if single cells had multiple place fields. Within the alternative, ensemble-coding hypothesis, the concurrent discharge of many place cells is a vector that represents current location. An ensemble place code is not degraded if single cells have multiple place fields as long as the discharge vector at each location is unique. Place cells with multiple place fields might be required to represent the substantially larger space in more natural environments. To distinguish between the dedicated-coding and ensemble-coding hypotheses, we compared the characteristics of CA1 place fields in a standard cylinder and an approximately six times larger chamber. Compared with the cylinder, in the chamber, more CA1 neurons were place cells, each with multiple, irregularly arranged, and enlarged place fields. The results indicate that multiple place fields is a fundamental feature of CA1 place cell activity and that, consequently, an ensemble place code is required for CA1 discharge to accurately signal location.

AB - In standard experimental environments, a constant proportion of CA1 principal cells are place cells, each with a spatial receptive field called a place field. Although the properties of place cells are a basis for understanding the mammalian representation of spatial knowledge, there is no consensus on which of the two fundamental neural-coding hypotheses correctly accounts for how place cells encode spatial information. Within the dedicated-coding hypothesis, the current activity of each cell is an independent estimate of the location with respect to its place field. The average of the location estimates from many cells represents current location, so a dedicated place code would degrade if single cells had multiple place fields. Within the alternative, ensemble-coding hypothesis, the concurrent discharge of many place cells is a vector that represents current location. An ensemble place code is not degraded if single cells have multiple place fields as long as the discharge vector at each location is unique. Place cells with multiple place fields might be required to represent the substantially larger space in more natural environments. To distinguish between the dedicated-coding and ensemble-coding hypotheses, we compared the characteristics of CA1 place fields in a standard cylinder and an approximately six times larger chamber. Compared with the cylinder, in the chamber, more CA1 neurons were place cells, each with multiple, irregularly arranged, and enlarged place fields. The results indicate that multiple place fields is a fundamental feature of CA1 place cell activity and that, consequently, an ensemble place code is required for CA1 discharge to accurately signal location.

KW - CA1

KW - Extracellular recording

KW - Hippocampal function

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Neuronal ensembles

KW - Place cells

KW - Spatial cognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56149120491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56149120491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2862-08.2008

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2862-08.2008

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 11250

EP - 11262

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 44

ER -