Underwriting the Empire: Nizamiye Courts, Tax Farming and the Public Debt Administration in Ottoman Syria

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This article investigates the role of the Ottoman Nizamiye Court of First Instance in conflicts over capital between public revenue agencies and tax farmers in the Syrian district of Homs at the turn of the twentieth century. The court's records show that it adjudicated these conflicts in exclusive reference to codified law. However, I argue that the court's formalist adjudication responded to political and economic circumstances defined by the global fiscal crises of the 1870s. In the aftermath of these crises, tax farmers took on new roles underwriting both Ottoman public debt and foreign investment through contracts with public revenue collection agencies like the Public Debt Administration. These agencies employed codified law to garner as much of tax farmers' profits as possible. Tax farmers used the same law to contest these efforts and leverage their new economic influence to maintain control over regional markets and land. The court's formalist rulings served the prerogatives of imperial sovereignty and solvency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)374-404
Number of pages31
JournalIslamic Law and Society
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

national debt
Syria
taxes
farmer
public revenue
Law
solvency
foreign investment
sovereignty
economics
profit
twentieth century
district
market

Keywords

  • Credit
  • Debt
  • Homs
  • Nizamiye courts
  • Ottoman Syria
  • Public debt administration
  • Tax farming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Underwriting the Empire : Nizamiye Courts, Tax Farming and the Public Debt Administration in Ottoman Syria. / Barakat, Nora.

In: Islamic Law and Society, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.01.2019, p. 374-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{567e1d5ac5444148ad51fee89aea38a5,
title = "Underwriting the Empire: Nizamiye Courts, Tax Farming and the Public Debt Administration in Ottoman Syria",
abstract = "This article investigates the role of the Ottoman Nizamiye Court of First Instance in conflicts over capital between public revenue agencies and tax farmers in the Syrian district of Homs at the turn of the twentieth century. The court's records show that it adjudicated these conflicts in exclusive reference to codified law. However, I argue that the court's formalist adjudication responded to political and economic circumstances defined by the global fiscal crises of the 1870s. In the aftermath of these crises, tax farmers took on new roles underwriting both Ottoman public debt and foreign investment through contracts with public revenue collection agencies like the Public Debt Administration. These agencies employed codified law to garner as much of tax farmers' profits as possible. Tax farmers used the same law to contest these efforts and leverage their new economic influence to maintain control over regional markets and land. The court's formalist rulings served the prerogatives of imperial sovereignty and solvency.",
keywords = "Credit, Debt, Homs, Nizamiye courts, Ottoman Syria, Public debt administration, Tax farming",
author = "Nora Barakat",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/15685195-00264P02",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "374--404",
journal = "Islamic Law and Society",
issn = "0928-9380",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Underwriting the Empire

T2 - Nizamiye Courts, Tax Farming and the Public Debt Administration in Ottoman Syria

AU - Barakat, Nora

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This article investigates the role of the Ottoman Nizamiye Court of First Instance in conflicts over capital between public revenue agencies and tax farmers in the Syrian district of Homs at the turn of the twentieth century. The court's records show that it adjudicated these conflicts in exclusive reference to codified law. However, I argue that the court's formalist adjudication responded to political and economic circumstances defined by the global fiscal crises of the 1870s. In the aftermath of these crises, tax farmers took on new roles underwriting both Ottoman public debt and foreign investment through contracts with public revenue collection agencies like the Public Debt Administration. These agencies employed codified law to garner as much of tax farmers' profits as possible. Tax farmers used the same law to contest these efforts and leverage their new economic influence to maintain control over regional markets and land. The court's formalist rulings served the prerogatives of imperial sovereignty and solvency.

AB - This article investigates the role of the Ottoman Nizamiye Court of First Instance in conflicts over capital between public revenue agencies and tax farmers in the Syrian district of Homs at the turn of the twentieth century. The court's records show that it adjudicated these conflicts in exclusive reference to codified law. However, I argue that the court's formalist adjudication responded to political and economic circumstances defined by the global fiscal crises of the 1870s. In the aftermath of these crises, tax farmers took on new roles underwriting both Ottoman public debt and foreign investment through contracts with public revenue collection agencies like the Public Debt Administration. These agencies employed codified law to garner as much of tax farmers' profits as possible. Tax farmers used the same law to contest these efforts and leverage their new economic influence to maintain control over regional markets and land. The court's formalist rulings served the prerogatives of imperial sovereignty and solvency.

KW - Credit

KW - Debt

KW - Homs

KW - Nizamiye courts

KW - Ottoman Syria

KW - Public debt administration

KW - Tax farming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072792716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072792716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15685195-00264P02

DO - 10.1163/15685195-00264P02

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85072792716

VL - 26

SP - 374

EP - 404

JO - Islamic Law and Society

JF - Islamic Law and Society

SN - 0928-9380

IS - 4

ER -