Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Localization Protocols, and Internet of Underwater Things

Mohammed Jouhari, Khalil Ibrahimi, Tembine Hamidou, Jalel Ben-Othman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Underwater communication remains a challenging technology via communication cables and the cost of underwater sensor network (UWSN) deployment is still very high. As an alternative, underwater wireless communication has been proposed and have received more attention in the last decade. Preliminary research indicated that the Radio Frequency (RF) and Magneto-Inductive (MI) communication achieve higher data rate in the near field communication. The optical communication achieves good performance when limited to the line-of-sight positioning. The acoustic communication allows long transmission range. However, it suffers from transmission losses and time-varying signal distortion due to its dependency on environmental properties. These latter are salinity, temperature, pressure, depth of transceivers, and the environment geometry. This paper is focused on both the acoustic and magneto-inductive communications, which are the most used technologies for underwater networking. Such as acoustic communication is employed for applications requiring long communication range while the MI is used for real-time communication. Moreover, this paper highlights the trade-off between underwater properties, wireless communication technologies, and communication quality. This can help the researcher community by providing clear insight for further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8763947
Pages (from-to)96879-96899
Number of pages21
JournalIEEE Access
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Wireless sensor networks
Internet
Network protocols
Communication
Acoustics
Signal distortion
Telecommunication cables
Optical communication
Transceivers
Sensor networks
Geometry
Costs

Keywords

  • acoustic communications
  • information transfer
  • Internet of Underwater Things
  • magneto-inductive communications
  • simultaneous wireless power
  • underwater wireless communications
  • Underwater wireless sensor networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks : A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Localization Protocols, and Internet of Underwater Things. / Jouhari, Mohammed; Ibrahimi, Khalil; Hamidou, Tembine; Ben-Othman, Jalel.

In: IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 8763947, 01.01.2019, p. 96879-96899.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ff740b0455b43eda44ec3ff4ff07f5c,
title = "Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Localization Protocols, and Internet of Underwater Things",
abstract = "Underwater communication remains a challenging technology via communication cables and the cost of underwater sensor network (UWSN) deployment is still very high. As an alternative, underwater wireless communication has been proposed and have received more attention in the last decade. Preliminary research indicated that the Radio Frequency (RF) and Magneto-Inductive (MI) communication achieve higher data rate in the near field communication. The optical communication achieves good performance when limited to the line-of-sight positioning. The acoustic communication allows long transmission range. However, it suffers from transmission losses and time-varying signal distortion due to its dependency on environmental properties. These latter are salinity, temperature, pressure, depth of transceivers, and the environment geometry. This paper is focused on both the acoustic and magneto-inductive communications, which are the most used technologies for underwater networking. Such as acoustic communication is employed for applications requiring long communication range while the MI is used for real-time communication. Moreover, this paper highlights the trade-off between underwater properties, wireless communication technologies, and communication quality. This can help the researcher community by providing clear insight for further research.",
keywords = "acoustic communications, information transfer, Internet of Underwater Things, magneto-inductive communications, simultaneous wireless power, underwater wireless communications, Underwater wireless sensor networks",
author = "Mohammed Jouhari and Khalil Ibrahimi and Tembine Hamidou and Jalel Ben-Othman",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928876",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "96879--96899",
journal = "IEEE Access",
issn = "2169-3536",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

T2 - A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Localization Protocols, and Internet of Underwater Things

AU - Jouhari, Mohammed

AU - Ibrahimi, Khalil

AU - Hamidou, Tembine

AU - Ben-Othman, Jalel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Underwater communication remains a challenging technology via communication cables and the cost of underwater sensor network (UWSN) deployment is still very high. As an alternative, underwater wireless communication has been proposed and have received more attention in the last decade. Preliminary research indicated that the Radio Frequency (RF) and Magneto-Inductive (MI) communication achieve higher data rate in the near field communication. The optical communication achieves good performance when limited to the line-of-sight positioning. The acoustic communication allows long transmission range. However, it suffers from transmission losses and time-varying signal distortion due to its dependency on environmental properties. These latter are salinity, temperature, pressure, depth of transceivers, and the environment geometry. This paper is focused on both the acoustic and magneto-inductive communications, which are the most used technologies for underwater networking. Such as acoustic communication is employed for applications requiring long communication range while the MI is used for real-time communication. Moreover, this paper highlights the trade-off between underwater properties, wireless communication technologies, and communication quality. This can help the researcher community by providing clear insight for further research.

AB - Underwater communication remains a challenging technology via communication cables and the cost of underwater sensor network (UWSN) deployment is still very high. As an alternative, underwater wireless communication has been proposed and have received more attention in the last decade. Preliminary research indicated that the Radio Frequency (RF) and Magneto-Inductive (MI) communication achieve higher data rate in the near field communication. The optical communication achieves good performance when limited to the line-of-sight positioning. The acoustic communication allows long transmission range. However, it suffers from transmission losses and time-varying signal distortion due to its dependency on environmental properties. These latter are salinity, temperature, pressure, depth of transceivers, and the environment geometry. This paper is focused on both the acoustic and magneto-inductive communications, which are the most used technologies for underwater networking. Such as acoustic communication is employed for applications requiring long communication range while the MI is used for real-time communication. Moreover, this paper highlights the trade-off between underwater properties, wireless communication technologies, and communication quality. This can help the researcher community by providing clear insight for further research.

KW - acoustic communications

KW - information transfer

KW - Internet of Underwater Things

KW - magneto-inductive communications

KW - simultaneous wireless power

KW - underwater wireless communications

KW - Underwater wireless sensor networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070331932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070331932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928876

DO - 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928876

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070331932

VL - 7

SP - 96879

EP - 96899

JO - IEEE Access

JF - IEEE Access

SN - 2169-3536

M1 - 8763947

ER -