Understanding the unprotected sexual behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: An empirical test of the cognitive-environmental model

Margaret Rosario, Joyce Hunter, Karen Mahler, Marya Gwadz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The cognitive-environmental model (CEM; M. Fishbein et al., 1991) was used to understand the unprotected sexual behaviors of 156 gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. Unprotected anal sex among the males was associated directly with poor protection skills (e.g., incorrect use of barrier methods, such as condoms), poor intentions to use barrier methods, and poor norms by sexual partners concerning barrier methods. Furthermore, the association between low self-efficacy and increasing unprotected anal sex was attributed to poor intentions. Direct associations of unprotected oral sex with poor intentions and poor partner norms also emerged, as did an indirect relation between unprotected oral sex and low self-efficacy via poor intentions. These last 3 findings were replicated when examining unprotected oral or vaginal-digital sex among the females. Relations among the CEM factors supported some CEM- theoretical propositions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-280
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1999

Fingerprint

Unsafe Sex
Sexual Behavior
Self Efficacy
Sexual Partners
Condoms
Sexual Minorities

Keywords

  • Cognitive-environmental model (CEM)
  • Unprotected sexual behaviors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Understanding the unprotected sexual behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths : An empirical test of the cognitive-environmental model. / Rosario, Margaret; Hunter, Joyce; Mahler, Karen; Gwadz, Marya.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 05.1999, p. 272-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92fd18c3b8984a50a6fa3b2844b0485b,
title = "Understanding the unprotected sexual behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: An empirical test of the cognitive-environmental model",
abstract = "The cognitive-environmental model (CEM; M. Fishbein et al., 1991) was used to understand the unprotected sexual behaviors of 156 gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. Unprotected anal sex among the males was associated directly with poor protection skills (e.g., incorrect use of barrier methods, such as condoms), poor intentions to use barrier methods, and poor norms by sexual partners concerning barrier methods. Furthermore, the association between low self-efficacy and increasing unprotected anal sex was attributed to poor intentions. Direct associations of unprotected oral sex with poor intentions and poor partner norms also emerged, as did an indirect relation between unprotected oral sex and low self-efficacy via poor intentions. These last 3 findings were replicated when examining unprotected oral or vaginal-digital sex among the females. Relations among the CEM factors supported some CEM- theoretical propositions.",
keywords = "Cognitive-environmental model (CEM), Unprotected sexual behaviors",
author = "Margaret Rosario and Joyce Hunter and Karen Mahler and Marya Gwadz",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/0278-6133.18.3.272",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "272--280",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the unprotected sexual behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths

T2 - An empirical test of the cognitive-environmental model

AU - Rosario, Margaret

AU - Hunter, Joyce

AU - Mahler, Karen

AU - Gwadz, Marya

PY - 1999/5

Y1 - 1999/5

N2 - The cognitive-environmental model (CEM; M. Fishbein et al., 1991) was used to understand the unprotected sexual behaviors of 156 gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. Unprotected anal sex among the males was associated directly with poor protection skills (e.g., incorrect use of barrier methods, such as condoms), poor intentions to use barrier methods, and poor norms by sexual partners concerning barrier methods. Furthermore, the association between low self-efficacy and increasing unprotected anal sex was attributed to poor intentions. Direct associations of unprotected oral sex with poor intentions and poor partner norms also emerged, as did an indirect relation between unprotected oral sex and low self-efficacy via poor intentions. These last 3 findings were replicated when examining unprotected oral or vaginal-digital sex among the females. Relations among the CEM factors supported some CEM- theoretical propositions.

AB - The cognitive-environmental model (CEM; M. Fishbein et al., 1991) was used to understand the unprotected sexual behaviors of 156 gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. Unprotected anal sex among the males was associated directly with poor protection skills (e.g., incorrect use of barrier methods, such as condoms), poor intentions to use barrier methods, and poor norms by sexual partners concerning barrier methods. Furthermore, the association between low self-efficacy and increasing unprotected anal sex was attributed to poor intentions. Direct associations of unprotected oral sex with poor intentions and poor partner norms also emerged, as did an indirect relation between unprotected oral sex and low self-efficacy via poor intentions. These last 3 findings were replicated when examining unprotected oral or vaginal-digital sex among the females. Relations among the CEM factors supported some CEM- theoretical propositions.

KW - Cognitive-environmental model (CEM)

KW - Unprotected sexual behaviors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344849417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344849417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-6133.18.3.272

DO - 10.1037/0278-6133.18.3.272

M3 - Article

C2 - 10357508

AN - SCOPUS:0344849417

VL - 18

SP - 272

EP - 280

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 3

ER -